Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.
July-August 2017
A few years ago, a Harvard Business Review cover posed the question: What’s the secret to winning in the global economy? The answer: Talent. Browse this issue archive.Need Help? Contact customer service 847-559-7581 More options
For decades, supply chain planning (SCP) has been a major challenge for companies of all sizes. A common theme plays out in most cases: Organizations invest substantially—both in time and money—in their planning capabilities, only to see poor results.
Let’s take a recent example. A large consumer packaged goods company was struggling with less than ideal inventory performance and relatively high case fill rates. But because their performance metric was defined to favor the efforts of execution, rather than truly meeting demand on time and in full, their supply chain costs were higher than their peers.
This company had made years of investments in multiple SCP technologies that were only partly satisfactory. Spreadsheets were still persistent across the organization and were commonly used for key parts of the SCP process. When the organization uncovered gaps in their SCP technology capabilities, it remedied these shortfalls with temporary workarounds and the allocation of additional resources.
This complete article is available to subscribers only.
Log in now for full access or start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.
SC
MR
Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.
July-August 2017
A few years ago, a Harvard Business Review cover posed the question: What’s the secret to winning in the global economy? The answer: Talent. Browse this issue archive. Access your online digital edition. Download a PDF file of the July-August 2017 issue.For decades, supply chain planning (SCP) has been a major challenge for companies of all sizes. A common theme plays out in most cases: Organizations invest substantially—both in time and money—in their planning capabilities, only to see poor results.
Let's take a recent example. A large consumer packaged goods company was struggling with less than ideal inventory performance and relatively high case fill rates. But because their performance metric was defined to favor the efforts of execution, rather than truly meeting demand on time and in full, their supply chain costs were higher than their peers.
This company had made years of investments in multiple SCP technologies that were only partly satisfactory. Spreadsheets were still persistent across the organization and were commonly used for key parts of the SCP process. When the organization uncovered gaps in their SCP technology capabilities, it remedied these shortfalls with temporary workarounds and the allocation of additional resources.
SC
MR
Latest Supply Chain News
- Few executives believe their supply chains can respond quickly to disruptions
- Technology’s role in mending supply chain fragility after recent disruptions
- Tech investments bring revenue increases, survey finds
- Survey reveals strategies for addressing supply chain, logistics labor shortages
- Israel, Ukraine aid package to increase pressure on aerospace and defense supply chains
- More News
Latest Podcast
Explore
Procurement & Sourcing News
- Israel, Ukraine aid package to increase pressure on aerospace and defense supply chains
- How CPG brands can deliver on supplier diversity promises
- How S&OP provides the answer to in-demand products
- There is still work to do to achieve supply chain stability
- Blooming success: The vital role of S&OE in nurturing global supply chains
- How one small part held up shipments of thousands of autos
- More Procurement & Sourcing