Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.
May-June 2018
Last month, I was in Atlanta at the Modex trade show. In one sense, it is a tribute to the automation technologies managing today’s distribution networks. And, I’m not only talking about automated materials handling systems, but also the software and NextGen technologies such as robotics, wearable technologies, including smart glasses and augmented reality solutions and sensors enabling the Internet of Things. In another sense, all of these solutions are coming together to drive fulfillment. With the increase in e-commerce, getting the right product to the right customer at the right time has never been more important. Browse this issue archive.Need Help? Contact customer service 1-508-503-1313 More options
It is said that goldfish have a memory of about four seconds. That’s why they never get bored swimming around in a little bowl, rediscovering the same place over and over again. We may scoff at the repetitiveness of their ways, but are we really any better?
For some time now, offshoring has been one of the most important strategic decisions for manufacturing companies. The practice accelerated along with increased globalization and competition. The intent remains maximizing cost efficiency by shifting home-country production to low-cost countries. This sounds good, but the rewards have not always come to fruition. As a result, many companies are now looking at the possibility of reshoring.
There are numerous reasons to consider the shift, just ask the man in the White House. But the movement goes far beyond President Trump.
The American Manufacturers Association offers its own list of reasons to reshore:
- shorter manufacturing lead times;
- a more skilled workforce;
- rising costs of freight;
- local tax incentives;
- responsiveness to consumer demands; and
- offshore wages are rising.
Additional incentives to reshore are often found within the company and in how it manages the supply chain.
These include:
- growth of transaction costs;
- centralization of firm activities;
- reactive decisions; and
- overestimation of offshored savings originally.

This complete article is available to subscribers only.
Log in now for full access or start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.
SC
MR
Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.
May-June 2018
Last month, I was in Atlanta at the Modex trade show. In one sense, it is a tribute to the automation technologies managing today’s distribution networks. And, I’m not only talking about automated materials… Browse this issue archive. Access your online digital edition. Download a PDF file of the May-June 2018 issue.It is said that goldfish have a memory of about four seconds. That's why they never get bored swimming around in a little bowl, rediscovering the same place over and over again. We may scoff at the repetitiveness of their ways, but are we really any better?
For some time now, offshoring has been one of the most important strategic decisions for manufacturing companies. The practice accelerated along with increased globalization and competition. The intent remains maximizing cost efficiency by shifting home-country production to low-cost countries. This sounds good, but the rewards have not always come to fruition. As a result, many companies are now looking at the possibility of reshoring.
There are numerous reasons to consider the shift, just ask the man in the White House. But the movement goes far beyond President Trump.
The American Manufacturers Association offers its own list of reasons to reshore:
- shorter manufacturing lead times;
- a more skilled workforce;
- rising costs of freight;
- local tax incentives;
- responsiveness to consumer demands; and
- offshore wages are rising.
Additional incentives to reshore are often found within the company and in how it manages the supply chain.
These include:
- growth of transaction costs;
- centralization of firm activities;
- reactive decisions; and
- overestimation of offshored savings originally.
SC
MR

Latest Supply Chain News
- What options do you really have? Shaping the supply chain resilience funnel
- Nexus suppliers: Hidden anchors of resilience in decentralized supply chains
- Developing the next generation of supply chain leaders: Is higher education serving the needs of the marketplace?
- The value proposition: Bridging the skills gap between the SCM degree and the workplace
- Lead time economics: What semiconductor supply chains reveal about strategic planning
- More News
Latest Podcast

Explore
Procurement & Sourcing News
- Coordinating AI-enabled supply chain operations
- The hidden supply chain risk no dashboard shows
- AI is reshaping the last meter of delivery
- Last-mile delivery success begins before the driver arrives
- Elucidating import container flows: A simulation study of Port of New York/New Jersey
- Wayfair executive to share lessons from building a tech-driven delivery network in NextGen Keynote
- More Procurement & Sourcing
Latest Procurement & Sourcing Resources

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.

Editors’ Picks

