•   Exclusive

Competitive Supply Chains: Optimized Demand Management

Author's note: This is the third in a series of columns on competitive supply chains.

Subscriber: Log Out

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

This is an excerpt of the original article. It was written for the December 2015 edition of Supply Chain Management Review. The full article is available to current subscribers.

December 2015

It’s December, and time once again for our annual Executive Guide to Supply Chain Resources. This is a comprehensive guide to services, products, and educational opportunities targeted specifically to supply chain professionals. The editors at Supply Chain Management Review wish all of our readers a successful year to come.
Browse this issue archive.
Already a subscriber? Access full edition now.

Need Help?
Contact customer service
847-559-7581   More options
Not a subscriber? Start your magazine subscription.

Author’s note: This is the third in a series of columns on competitive supply chains. The first, “Supply Chains: Excellence,” appeared in the July/August 2015 issue. It defined an excellent supply chain as one that plays a major role in competing and identified the four salient requisite characteristics of excellent supply chains. The second, “Competitive Supply Chains: Strategic Alignment,” appeared in the September/October 2015 issue. It offered a planning process for aligning a supply chain to enable competitiveness. This third and final column in the series looks at the need to implement Demand Management (DM) processes that formally enable supply- and demand-side managers to collaborate over time. Without formal, routine joint decision-making processes, a supply chain organization is not really playing a major role in executing a corporate strategy, even if it is strategically aligned. - Larry Lapide

I have often researched, spoken, and written about the Sales and Operation Planning (S&OP) process, especially addressing supply chain manager issues. Speaking before supply chain audiences, I point out that this “matching of supply and demand” planning process has been a major focus of mine because, before joining the supply chain community, I started my career on the “dark side.” Many in the audience smile when I ask: What do I mean by that?

My Demand-Supply Perspective
Most assume that I came from sales. Actually, for the first 15 years of my career I was in marketing. I point out that too many in the audience don’t really know or care about the difference between the marketing and sales functions because “all those managers complicate things for supply chain folks, making our jobs harder!” However, there is a difference. A sales rep is responsible for selling the products a company has today, while a marketing manager focuses on promoting products and ensuring that a company has products to sell in the future. Thus, marketing is a strategic function. In the S&OP process, sales offers valuable input about short-term revenues, while marketing is more knowledgeable about the long-term.

This complete article is available to subscribers only.
Click on Log In Now at the top of this article for full access.
Or, Start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.

SC
MR

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

From the December 2015 edition of Supply Chain Management Review.

December 2015

It’s December, and time once again for our annual Executive Guide to Supply Chain Resources. This is a comprehensive guide to services, products, and educational opportunities targeted specifically to supply chain…
Browse this issue archive.
Access your online digital edition.
Download a PDF file of the December 2015 issue.

Download Article PDF

Author's note: This is the third in a series of columns on competitive supply chains. The first, “Supply Chains: Excellence,” appeared in the July/August 2015 issue. It defined an excellent supply chain as one that plays a major role in competing and identified the four salient requisite characteristics of excellent supply chains. The second, “Competitive Supply Chains: Strategic Alignment,” appeared in the September/October 2015 issue. It offered a planning process for aligning a supply chain to enable competitiveness. This third and final column in the series looks at the need to implement Demand Management (DM) processes that formally enable supply- and demand-side managers to collaborate over time. Without formal, routine joint decision-making processes, a supply chain organization is not really playing a major role in executing a corporate strategy, even if it is strategically aligned. - Larry Lapide

I have often researched, spoken, and written about the Sales and Operation Planning (S&OP) process, especially addressing supply chain manager issues. Speaking before supply chain audiences, I point out that this “matching of supply and demand” planning process has been a major focus of mine because, before joining the supply chain community, I started my career on the “dark side.” Many in the audience smile when I ask: What do I mean by that?

My Demand-Supply Perspective
Most assume that I came from sales. Actually, for the first 15 years of my career I was in marketing. I point out that too many in the audience don't really know or care about the difference between the marketing and sales functions because “all those managers complicate things for supply chain folks, making our jobs harder!” However, there is a difference. A sales rep is responsible for selling the products a company has today, while a marketing manager focuses on promoting products and ensuring that a company has products to sell in the future. Thus, marketing is a strategic function. In the S&OP process, sales offers valuable input about short-term revenues, while marketing is more knowledgeable about the long-term.

SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article.

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Talking Supply Chain: Doomsday never arrives for Baltimore bridge collapse impacts
The collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key bridge brought doomsday headlines for the supply chain. But the reality has been something less…
Listen in

About the Author

Larry Lapide, Research Affiliate
Larry Lapide's Bio Photo

Dr. Lapide is a lecturer at the University of Massachusetts’ Boston Campus and is an MIT Research Affiliate. He received the inaugural Lifetime Achievement in Business Forecasting & Planning Award from the Institute of Business Forecasting & Planning. Dr. Lapide can be reached at: [email protected].

View Lawrence's author profile.

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service