The importance of relevance to the P and L Statement cannot be overstated. If you report procurement results that can’t be found on the Income Statement, your credibility will suffer greatly. In fact, as a CPO, I literally banned the word “savings” from our practice. Either a result was cost reduction, or it was cost avoidance. But never was it labeled by the vague term “savings.”
To have the best chance of credibility with your internal clients, you need to build a framework and tracking system that is P & L relevant – and that means tracking and reporting only cost reduction from operating costs.

This framework is one of the foundations for a credible approach to reporting the results from the efforts of your teams.
More in my next posting.
(Note: portions of this blog series are based on the author’s new book “Next Level Supply Management Excellence” – a sequel to the bestselling book “Straight to the Bottom Line® )
SC
MR

Latest Supply Chain News
- What options do you really have? Shaping the supply chain resilience funnel
- Nexus suppliers: Hidden anchors of resilience in decentralized supply chains
- Developing the next generation of supply chain leaders: Is higher education serving the needs of the marketplace?
- The value proposition: Bridging the skills gap between the SCM degree and the workplace
- Lead time economics: What semiconductor supply chains reveal about strategic planning
- More News
Latest Podcast

Explore
Latest Supply Chain News
- Coordinating AI-enabled supply chain operations
- The hidden supply chain risk no dashboard shows
- CSCOs need plant leaders to close the manufacturing transformation gap
- AI is reshaping the last meter of delivery
- Last-mile delivery success begins before the driver arrives
- The Digital Supply Chain Imperative: From Visibility to Execution
- More latest news
Latest Resources

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.

Editors’ Picks
