From perk to strategy: Rethinking tuition programs for supply chain success

From the January-February 2026 edition of Supply Chain Management Review.

January-February 2026

The January 2026 issue of Supply Chain Management Review explores how rapid advances in autonomous trucking, AI-driven optimization, and workforce development are redefining what it means to lead a modern supply…

Browse this issue archive.

Access your online digital edition.

Download a PDF file of the January-February 2026 issue.

Supply chain executives know all about problems related to employee turnover; but now it is especially critical. Consequences in operational effectiveness, competitive advantage, and business development are dramatic. Companies counteroffer with tuition aid programs (TAPs) as the “golden ticket” to increase retention and workforce development. On paper, the formula is simple: invest in educating your people, and they will stick around. But reality is another matter.

What’s going wrong? For most supply chain professionals, the actual chasm is not availability but accessibility and equity. Upfront expenses, process barriers, and managerial judgment keep career development out of reach for exactly the frontline talent supply chains need most. Leaders too frequently miss structural barriers that render a potentially appealing perk a lost cause. Suppose the supply chain career realm is to thrive amidst current volatility. In that case, tuition assistance has to shift, from a one-size-fits-all benefit to a powerful, equitable talent strategy.

The supply chain talent challenge

Organizations today struggle to bridge a growing gap between business expectations and workforce realities. A recent summary of Gartner research via Supply Chain Digest reports that 31% of supply chain professionals indicate they intend to leave firms within a year. Yet, chief supply chain officers identify only 40% ranking talent attraction and retention as a near-term priority this year, versus 56% in the past year’s survey (Kim & Variyam, 2024), an alarming drop in a time of existing disruptions, a shortage of workers, and growing demand for frontline logistics professionals.

On the surface, many companies tout tuition benefit programs (TAPs) as a solution to turnover. Such programs are known to work against declining employee attrition rates even during crisis periods like the COVID-19 pandemic (Little et al., 2024). However, TAPs’ effectiveness is actually relatively narrow: less than 10% of the eligible workforce make use of TAPs, and only about 2% utilize such programs to continue studies despite the working population’s strong interest (Hundrev, 2024; InStride, 2024).

These gaps are not just theoretical; they have daily operational consequences. With lagging retention, companies pay ongoing training costs, operational losses, and the possibility of losing institutional knowledge. Frontline staff point to dissatisfaction and disengagement: In 2022, more than 60% of logistics staff viewed their jobs as long-term employment, but 40% considered resigning that same year because they were poorly paid and didn’t feel valued enough (Mizell-Pleasant, 2024).

Instead of being strategic tools, most tuition programs become lost opportunities handicapped by barriers, making them accessible to only a few advantaged individuals. Talent’s greatest challenge is not a paucity of programs but an inability on the part of those who need them most to participate and progress.

Barriers to tuition assistance access

Despite the universal presence of TAPs in supply chain organizations, participation rates remain exceedingly low due to a plethora of convoluted, permanent barriers. Such barriers are no minor issue; instead, they widen inequalities between roles and divisions, thus hampering career growth of frontline personnel upon whom supply chains draw most heavily. These barriers include:

Financial barrier. Most TAPs ask workers to pay out-of-pocket tuition expenses and apply for reimbursement upon completion of courses. This is often too expensive for many (37% of American adults reported not having any savings to cover a $400 emergency, according to a 2022 Federal Reserve report). In logistics and frontline work, where pay is often low and personnel already feel underpaid, advancing via education becomes a financially unreachable goal (Mizell-Pleasant, 2024).

Procedural ambiguity and managerial bias. Gaining approval for tuition reimbursement is often subjectively rather than objectively evaluated. Employees have to navigate a rugged terrain of managerial discretion where considerations such as “business alignment” or “readiness for promotion” shape ultimate decisions. Commenting upon Krieger’s (2023) views, a lack of transparent and consistent evaluation criteria creates a “hoops mentality” and leads to a lot of dissatisfaction. Application processes often entail numerous levels of managerial approval and thus reinforce consequences of bias or favoritism. In many institutions, higher-level personnel receive approval for MBA studies while equally qualified frontliners hit roadblocks to entry-level certifications (Bramoullé & Huremović, 2020).

Awareness gaps. TAPs within the company are often tucked away in HR portals and only cursorily mentioned during onboarding. Though 80% of workers report interest in ongoing education, a paltry 40% even know that their employer has tuition benefits available, according to InStride’s 2024 research. Through failing to aggressively promote and physically walk individuals through these TAPs, least of all within shift or work-from-home workforces, frontliners rarely even know these life-changing opportunities exist (InStride, 2024).

Organizational justice and trust. The cumulative effect of these barriers goes beyond abstract statistics; it erodes trust and diminishes a culture of inclusion. Disparities in access and non-transparency around decision-making make professional development appear hyper-exclusive, viewed as a privilege granted only to those already within networks of management. By Gallani and colleagues’ (2020) account, the apparent shallow impact of reward systems is often overtaken by the “opportunity effect,” wherein those prevented from gaining these benefits face declines in engagement and performance.

Without a major redesign, tuition assistance programs risk doing more harm than good. Financial obstacles keep frontline workers out, subjective approval processes invite discrimination, inept communication leaves a large section of employees unaware of available opportunities, and transparent decision-making erodes trust. What’s supposed to level playing fields ends up entrenching existing inequalities, locking out those same workers whose supply chains require them most. The ultimate impact is lost potential, disengagement, and avoidable turnover that acts against retention at its core.

Lessons from leading companies

Some organizations have gone beyond traditional limits inherent in tuition aid programs by designing programs that are easily accessible, financially equitable, and consistent with organizational missions. Rather than treating educational benefits as simple symbolic rewards, these firms have eliminated financial obstacles, streamlined eligibility, and focused on supporting frontline staff who often fall outside mainstream designs. The results are impressive: improved employee retention rates, fast-tracked promotion counts, and tangible gains in mobility in the workforce. Table 1 compares three leading programs: Target, Amazon, and Chipotle exemplify how immediate grants, quick eligibility, and a focus on frontline personnel can generate tangible business benefits.

 

Target: Democratizing opportunity from day one. Target’s “Dream to Be” program offers 100% upfront tuition at more than 40 accredited colleges and universities, and eligibility begins on the employee’s first day of employment for part-time and full-time employees (Target, 2023). This inclusive model eliminates financial and accessibility constraints, without out-of-pocket costs or prior tenure requirements. Remarkable outcomes ensue: Target reduced turnover among involved hourly team members by 70% and tripled promotion rates. Interestingly, an impressive 90% of participants in the program have been frontline team members, demonstrating a rarity in accessing often-overlooked talent within conventional TAP designs (Loeb, 2023).

Amazon: Prepaying for progress and retention. According to researcher Connie Chen (2025), Amazon’s Career Choice covers 95% of tuition and related fees upfront for logistics, IT, and in-demand skills degrees and certifications. It’s eligible after 90 days of employment, a notable extension beyond traditional reimbursement methodologies. Over 250,000 Amazon staff around the globe have benefited since it launched in 2012. This method calls out both retention and mobility explicitly, enabling professional development beyond leaders to include lower-wage and hourly staff.

Chipotle: Immediate access with no-strings funding. Chipotle’s Cultivate Education program partners with Guild Education to offer 100% upfront tuition for more than 75 degree programs, some of which become accessible to workers after having worked part-time for only 120 days (Sanborn, 2022). It covers a wide range of institutions and disciplines, eliminating the financial hurdle while facilitating development on any scale. What’s notable about it is that it helps in excess of 80 master’s programs with partial reimbursement. Its overall impact is a happier employee base, higher internal mobility, and a stronger employer brand (Gerut, 2025).

Shared features of best-in-class TAPs

• Direct-bill or upfront payments remove financial hardship as a barrier.
• Eligibility begins early, not after years of service or managerial approval.
• Frontline and hourly workers are core beneficiaries, not afterthoughts.
• Programs are clearly communicated, transparent, and promoted internally.

Major players such as Walmart, Liberty Mutual, and TEL Education have embraced comparable strategies, underscoring that equity and accessibility in tuition efforts foster retention, progress, and innovation (Lobell, 2021).

Actionable solutions and recommendations

To transform tuition assistance from a missed opportunity into a source of supply chain resilience and equity, companies need to reconsider structure and delivery rather than grant blanket benefits. Most successful designs speak directly to frontliners’ and lead leaders’ barriers to five proven actions.

1. Eliminate financial barriers

• Adopt direct-bill arrangements where tuition is paid directly to educational institutions, obviating employee burdens to pay out-of-pocket and be reimbursed.
• Provide financial stipends to help offset associated expenses, including textbooks and technology materials, to prevent associated costs from
• hindering attendance.
• Explore income-share agreements or deferred tuition models for high-impact, hard-to-fill frontline roles.

2. Standardize transparent criteria

• Create clear, merit-based eligibility standards tied to business goals and talent development, instead of promotion expectations.
• Pre-approve a wide range of relevant courses, degrees, and certifications so employees know exactly what’s covered.
• Remove vague requirements such as promotability or subjective business alignment constraints.

3. Decentralize approval authority

• Replace outmoded and subjective gatekeeping processes with cross-functional review committees, including HR, operations, and finances, to remove unevenness and subjectivity.
• Employ software or analytics tools to monitor and flag demographic disparities in TAP approvals and usage.

4. Democratize program awareness

• Integrate TAP information into onboarding and ongoing employee communications beyond HR portals.
• Utilize mobile messaging and push notifications to keep the opportunity front-of-mind both for shift-based or distributed teams.
• Regularly showcase success stories and outcomes from front-line employees who have advanced through the program.

5. Audit and rebalance regularly

• Track participation, completions, and finish rates by job function, department, and demographic segment.
• Redistribute investment proactively to underserved locations or divisions with minimal participation, bridging gaps in closing.
• Link bonuses for people managers and executives to progress on equity metrics in education benefit access.

By converting TAPs into business-oriented talent strategies, supply chain companies can attract, build, and keep the people they require while maintaining opportunity accessible to all. These steps can be taken and tested, and they have already been tested by industry leaders who have reaped rewards.

The strategic payoff

When organizations move from beyond selective and siloed investment in tuition to fair-based performance-oriented programs, rewards extend beyond those considered in conventional return on investment (ROI) analysis. Organizations that reimagine tuition aid within broader-based overall talent management notice phenomenal increases in employee retention rates, flexibility, and brand strength.

Stronger retention and internal mobility. Companies such as Target, Amazon, and Chipotle have substantiated the business case: Target’s program reduced hourly turnover by 70% and tripled promotion rates within frontline workers (Loeb, 2023). Amazon’s Career Choice has allowed more than 250,000 operations workers to develop skills for promotion and growth within and across the firm (Chen, 2025). These outcomes indicate that fair TAPs can significantly mitigate churn that is draining supply chain performance.

Beyond traditional ROI: Measuring what matters. While some institutions have reported astonishing returns on investment in tuition programs, such as Accenture’s 353% and Cigna’s 129%, both analysts and researchers in business caution against focusing solely on financial gain (Nicastro, 2020). Actual value is reflected in indicators such as workforce stability and growth, including participation rates, retention figures, and promotion outcomes. A skilled and dependable supply chain workforce offers a long-term competitive advantage, enabling a company to pursue strategic initiatives and withstand ongoing disruptions, a point highlighted by Birou and Hoek (2022) and Tenpas et al (2023).

Agility and innovation through learning. TAPs reinforce concepts in Adaptive Learning Theory such that workers can perform optimally in changing contexts upon gaining flexible mindsets and desirable competencies (Ihichr et al., 2024; Mmom, 2022). Workgroups with readily available continued education exhibit higher flexibility levels, improved process improvement, and better adaptation to technology changes, compared to those where only a few are efficiently upgraded.

Employer brand magnetism. Tuition programs are also great attractors of talent. A recent survey carried out by InStride, as reported by Hundrev (2024), reported that 84% of workers at Fortune 500 companies regard tuition help as a deciding factor in selecting a workplace, and 71% cite it, right after healthcare, as a highly valuable benefit. Such education support has become table stakes in attracting and keeping supply chain professionals. Organizations such as Chipotle have reshaped not only turnover but also their image, generating enthusiasm among job hunters and boosting intracompany movement (Gerut, 2025). Amazon, too, positions Career Choice as a stepping stone to long-term career development internally or externally (Chen, 2025).

Ultimately, organizations that design tuition benefit programs that are equitable, communicated well, and tied to performance position themselves as true employers of choice. By minimizing obstacles and expanding access, they not only build trust and commitment but also enhance retention, mobility, and brand equity. The payoff is greater than short-term ROI: these plans future-proof talent streams, create a more adaptive workforce, and imbue supply chains with resiliency and flexibility to thrive within a more disrupted global environment.

Leadership and implementation takeaways

For supply chain leaders, equal tuition aid is not only an HR policy but a business imperative of corporate strategy that demands transparent, evidence-driven, and multi-functional initiatives. To make TAPs a reality as true accelerators of talents, leaders and managers need to:

Lead from the top with transparency and example. Senior leaders must promote open eligibility, openly discuss their own career development histories, and make attendance at TAP a transparent component of corporate culture. Open expressions of executive approval suggest that growth and development are valued highly throughout all levels, not only for those within promotion range.

Break down silos with cross-functional teams. Implementation success relies on energetic collaboration between operations, HR, and finance to keep TAPs current and relevant to frontlines’ needs. With this mutual monitoring, gatekeeping is averted and programs are aligned with shifting organizational strategy.

Focus on metrics that matter. Go beyond minimal return-on-investment metrics. Measure TAP participation, retention rates, and upward mobility across departments, functions, and demographic groups. Use data to uncover and address gaps in access and celebrate those departments that excel in inclusive development.

Over-communicate policies and pathways. Clear and frequent communication, through onboarding, mobile technology, and team meetings, ensures that all associates know what is available and how to begin. Highlighting success stories about frontline associates can create broader use and reinforce faith in leaders’ commitment.

Confront bias and hold leaders accountable. Regularly running analytics will be necessary to identify denial rates or imbalances in any demographic region that are disproportionate. Tie part of executive and manager compensation to verifiable progress toward equity and use of TAP, ensuring permanent accountability for change.

By instilling these values in day-to-day leadership and program management, supply chain organizations can transform tuition assistance from an exchange-based benefit to a growth-oriented strategic driver. Leaders who espouse equity, track meaningful results, and take ownership of responsibility ensure that TAPs become drivers for innovation, engagement, and lasting workforce stability that emboldens both the people who power supply chains and the institutions that serve them.

Conclusion: Call to action

Treating education benefits as merely a perk or checkbox is no longer an advantage, especially when talent unpredictability can both snap and craft the supply chain. Access to education on a fair basis is no longer a nicety; it’s a strategic resilience switch for innovation and future-proofed growth. The proof is in the pudding: transparent, performance-based, accessible programs drive retention, productivity, and employer brand.

Leaders must move swiftly to break down entrenched barriers, reorient eligibility and approval, and incorporate education benefits into the fabric of their culture. This entails leading by example, monitoring outcomes rigidly, and holding supervisors, executives, and everyone in between accountable for equitable access and development outcomes. Now is the moment to turn tuition assistance into a true differentiator. By doing so, supply chain executives will not only reduce turnover but also unleash hidden potential, toughen their people, and gain a powerful advantage in a world where disruption is unforgiving.

About the author

Corrine Chen is an educator, researcher, and former industry executive with over a decade of hands-on experience in supply chain management, procurement, and innovation. She teaches supply chain management courses at the University of Nebraska Omaha. Chen’s work bridges academia and practice, with published research, applied projects, and a passion for empowering the next generation of supply chain professionals. She can be reached at [email protected]

References

1. Birou, L., & Hoek, R. V. (2022). Supply chain management talent: The role of executives in engagement, recruitment, development and retention. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 27(6), 712–727. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-08-2020-0418

2. Bramoullé, Y., & Huremović, K. (2020). Promotion through connections:
Favors or information? arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.07723

3. Chen, C. (2025, April 7). Everything you need to know about Career Choice, Amazon’s education benefit that pre-pays tuition for degrees and skills development. About Amazon. https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/workplace/career-choice-free-
education-for-amazon-employees

4. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386

5. Federal Reserve. (2023). Report on the Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households in 2022. https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/2022-report-economic-well-being-us-households-202305.pdf

 6. Gallani, S., Cai, W., & Shin, J. E. (2020). Nominal and opportunity effects of managerial discretion [Working paper]. Harvard Business School. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Shared%20Documents/conferences/2020%20-%20IMO/
Susanna%20Gallani%20Paper.pdf

7.  Gerut, A. (2025, May 21). Chipotle employees are rising through the ranks and making 6 figures after Guild suggested a simple switch that transformed the workforce. Fortune. https://fortune.com/2025/05/21/chipotle-crew-member-tuition-assistance-reimbursement-program-guild-workforce/

8. Hundrev, I. (2024, January 18). Must-know tuition reimbursement statistics for 2025. InStride. https://www.instride.com/insights/tuition-reimbursement-statistics/

9. Ihichr, A., Oustous, O., El Idrissi, Y. E. B., & Lahcen, A. A. (2024). A Systematic Review on Assessment in Adaptive Learning: Theories, Algorithms and Techniques. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications, 15(7).

10. InStride. (2024). Why employees want more than tuition assistance: Trends, insights and statistics from InStride’s survey of employees from Fortune 500 companies [White paper]. https://get.instride.com/rs/988-ADG-844/images/ebook-what-employees-think-about-traditional-education-programs.pdf

11. Krieger, J. T. (2023). Employer tuition assistance: Current approaches and the application of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Northwestern University Law Review, 117(6), 1661–1673. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/nulr/vol117/iss6/5/

12. Le, H., Palmer Johnson, C., & Fujimoto, Y. (2021). Organizational justice and climate for inclusion. Personnel Review, 50(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2019-0546

13. Little, B. M., Arik, M., & Geho, P. (2024). Exploring the impact of tuition
reimbursement programs on actual turnover in manufacturing: Pre- and post-COVID insights. Global Journal of Management & Marketing, 8(1), 1–18.

14. Loeb, W. (2023, November 8). Target’s education assistance program is great engagement for associates. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/walterloeb/2023/11/08/targets-education-assistance-program-is-great-engagement-for-associates

15. Lobell, K. O. (2021, October 11). Why more employers are leveraging tuition assistance to attract and retain employees. SHRM. https://www.shrm.org/topics-tools/news/benefits-compensation/employers-leveraging-tuition-assistance-
to-attract-retain-employees

16. Mizell-Pleasant, A. (2024, April 24). Report finds frontline logistics employees feel undervalued. Supply & Demand Chain Executive. https://www.sdcexec.com/professional-development/retention/news/22894043/quinyx-report-finds-logistics-employees-feel-undervalued

17. Mmom, C. P. C. (2022). Staff development programmes for faculty performance. International Journal of Economics, Environmental
Development and Society, 3(3), 346–358.

18. Nicastro, D. (2020, November 13). No, ROI isn’t the best performance metric for L&D. Reworked. https://www.reworked.co/learning-development/is-roi-a-dead-metric-for-learning-development/

19. Sanborn, A. (2022, December 1). New Chipotle benefit puts employees through college. Work It Daily. https://www.workitdaily.com/chipotle-education-benefits

20. Supply Chain Digest. (2024, September 10). Companies need to be careful in backing off supply chain talent management, Gartner says. Retrieved from https://www.scdigest.com/ontarget/24-0910_gartner_supply_chain_tapent_management.php

21. Target. (2023, November 6). Shine on: Two years in, Target’s tuition-free education benefit is helping team members reach their career goals. Target Corporate. https://corporate.target.com/news-features/article/2023/11/dream-to-be-update

22. Tenpas, A., Dietrich, E., Fitzgerald, B., & DeRemer, C. (2023). Financial reimbursement and productivity metrics for pharmacist-led chronic care management services in rural practice settings. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 19(5), 778–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.01.004

SC
MR