This week I am in Moscow for a conference and a bit of vacation. Overall, I find Moscow to be a bit bleak - miles of low-slung beige and gray block-style buildings reminiscent of the Cold War Soviet government. The exceptions include a small group of new downtown skyscrapers and Red Square.
With my China sourcing consulting business, I have been to Beijing and Tiananmen Square many times but this is the first time I’ve been to Moscow and its famous Red Square. Both cities are heavily industrialized, the seat of their respective governments, and both have famous Squares. So how does Red Square compare to Tiananmen Square?
First, they are both enormous. The Chinese claim that Tiananmen can hold a million people and being there, it seems possible. While not as big, Red Square is quite impressive, with the attached Kremlin grounds and several churches and museums. Both have picturesque historical buildings including the Chinese Forbidden City and the Russian St. Basil’s Cathedral with the colorful onion domes. On the sides of both Squares are the seats of government: The Chinese Communist Party and the Kremlin. Both Squares have remarkable museums with extensive and awesome collections. Both Squares have monuments to workers. Tiananmen has Mao’s Mausoleum and Red Square has Lenin’s Mausoleum.
But the more important thing is that these two Squares were built as places of powerful governments and a show of might and strength. Both Squares are often used for military parades and other official government business. The message seems to be tops-down with leadership and power at the pinnacle and the people at the bottom. You can “feel” this in both places to the point where it is a bit intimidating.
Contrast that with American monuments such as the Washington Mall. The Mall seems to have a totally different feel, more egalitarian, more “Of the People.” Even the White House is surrounded by an open fence, unlike the high walls of the Forbidden City and the Kremlin.
It serves us well to remember and respect these distinctions when we are dealing with global commerce. Most nations of the world maintain tight control over capitalist ventures and international commerce. We need to be aware and sensitive to cultural and governmental differences in our Supply Chain planning and execution.
SC
MR

Latest Supply Chain News
- Stop moving boxes, start moving dollars: The new math of global supply chain velocity
- Finding your rhythm: SME supply chain footwork when the rules keep changing
- Your supply chain automation should trade like a hedge fund
- Supply chain’s new normal isn’t stability, it’s change
- Why trust, flexibility, and execution now matter more than speed
- More News
Latest Podcast

Explore
Topics
Latest Supply Chain News
- PepsiCo moves its startup sustainability program from pilots to operational scale across Asia Pacific
- Eli Lilly’s Mar Gimeno to keynote at NextGen Supply Chain Conference 2026
- Agentic coding and the future of supply chain leadership
- From orbit to operations: Winning the race for the earliest disruption signal
- Stop moving boxes, start moving dollars: The new math of global supply chain velocity
- Finding your rhythm: SME supply chain footwork when the rules keep changing
- More latest news
Latest Resources

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.

Editors’ Picks
