The case for verified security

Transportation management systems are the central nervous system of their company’s operations. Across dispatch, planning, financial, and a range of processes, they interact with everyone from executives to drivers, as well as customers. They also hold the key to efficiency and productivity, with their adoption capable of becoming a competitive advantage.

For most IT professionals in trucking, keeping their current TMS operating is a 24/7 job. Today, unfortunately, what may be keeping tech experts awake at night is the ongoing and growing threat of a cyberattack. As Ted Schlein of venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins said, “There are only two types of companies: those that have been breached and know it, and those that have been breached and don’t know it yet.”

Often, the focus on meeting that challenge is on finding gaps in a TMS and erecting barriers to entry. Still, with the use of integrated solutions from third-party providers and an increasingly connected mobile workforce, there are many holes to fill. What may be overlooked, however, is the inherent vulnerability of legacy systems.

Outdated systems

Many fleets still rely on outdated transportation management systems built when cybersecurity meant keeping the server room door locked. These older TMS platforms were engineered for closed networks and minimal connectivity. Their weaknesses include:

• Custom code that standard security patches fail to protect
• No continuous monitoring so security incidents can go undetected for days.
• Manual patch cycles that require per-customer updates.
• Obsolete codebases that limit available expertise.
• Weak access controls and minimal audit logging that create internal exposure.

Today’s attackers exploit those structural gaps. One fuel hauler’s experience is a sobering reminder of the consequences—two separate cyberattacks, $6 million in ransom, and complete data loss.

With a legacy TMS architecture, whether on-premise or a hosted single-tenant system, every security responsibility from firewall management to incident response falls on the operator, not the software provider. Even private cloud hosting, which improved convenience, does not address the security architecture needed to repel cyberattacks because each customer’s application requires different firewalls, encryption standards, and log settings.

When a vulnerability emerges with these single-tenant systems, vendors must patch hundreds of separate environments, a process that often trails behind attacker timelines. Over time as well, customizations or inconsistent configurations create blind spots that even the most diligent IT teams struggle to monitor effectively.

Security by design

Built from the ground up to consolidate infrastructure and codebase while also isolating data, a multi-tenant cloud system allows uniform patching, centralized monitoring, and consistent enforcement of security controls. The core features of these solutions include:

• Enterprise-grade safety, security, and access control for cloud servers at an affordable cost
• Tenant data isolated by independent encryption keys.
• AES-grade data encryption at rest and in transit.
• Single sign-on and multi-factor authentication.
• Real-time visibility for faster incident response.
• One shared code-base without customizations so every security improvement is propagated immediately and without gaps.

A modern multi-tenant TMS can also invest in obtaining SOC 2 Type II certification, the gold standard for verifying security performance. Unlike Type I, which merely reviews design documentation, Type II requires independent auditors to verify operation of encryption, monitoring, and access, not just at a given point in time, but over an extended monitoring period of 6-12 months.

For fleets and IT teams, partnering with a SOC 2 Type II-certified TMS provider delivers a measurable, independently validated level of protection that individual operators could not replicate affordably on their own.

Debunking myths

Despite the evidence, misconceptions about multi-tenant systems persist. One of the most common, for example, is that a company’s data will be exposed to others, even competitors. In truth, the logical separation and unique encryption keys of these systems are designed to keep every tenant fully isolated.

Some companies also mistakenly believe that owning and operating servers internally mitigates risk, a misconception when you’re using a managed multi-tenant system backed by a continuous and highly qualified provider’s expertise who can provide access to the highest level of cyber security spreading its cost across many users.

There is also the unfounded belief that customization isn’t possible with multi-tenant systems. In reality, application-layer configuration and APIs allow extensive flexibility without compromising core security.

Industry-wide imperative

Former IBM CEO Ginni Rometty put it succinctly: “Cybercrime is the single biggest threat to every company on earth.” For the transportation industry, the threat of cyberattacks is real. But cybersecurity is not a static goal. It’s an ever-evolving discipline rooted in systems designed to address the threats of today and tomorrow.

For IT professionals managing transportation technology, the mandate is clear—replace your outdated architecture with the resilience of a multi-tenant cloud platform that no stand-alone system can replicate.

About the author

Hans Galland is the CEO of BeyondTrucks, the provider of a transportation management system (TMS) designed to replace current legacy software and manual processes by providing enterprise fleets with an AI-native multi-tenant platform. Passionate about innovation in the US transportation industry, he regularly contributes to leading trade publications and maintains a widely-read blog on the BeyondTrucks website that has become an essential resource for industry professionals.

SC
MR