How do you put a value on avoiding a problem that seemingly no longer exists because you’ve already spent money on eliminating it?
This is the classic Catch-22 dilemma faced by many corporate security managers when trying to justify further investments in steeling the supply chain against disruptions.
It’s a vexing problem, but there are ways around it, says Yossi Sheffi, MIT Elisha Gray II Professor of Engineering Systems, Director MIT CTL.
Read more here
SC
MR
Latest Supply Chain News
- The biggest barrier to AI in supply chains isn’t technology
- Rebuilding a planning function around the physical world
- Why companies blame the wrong supplier … and miss the real failure
- NextGen Supply Chain Conference unveils agenda focused on AI, execution and the future of leadership
- From fragmented negotiations to coordinated negotiation performance: an AI-enabled approach
- More News
Latest Podcast
Explore
Latest Supply Chain News
- Why companies blame the wrong supplier … and miss the real failure
- NextGen Supply Chain Conference unveils agenda focused on AI, execution and the future of leadership
- From fragmented negotiations to coordinated negotiation performance: an AI-enabled approach
- Supply chain resilience isn’t a data problem; it’s a judgment problem
- Beyond the hype: Building flexible and scalable supply chains in a VUCA world
- Why your supply chain risk management plan will fail
- More latest news
Latest Resources
About the Author
Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor specializing in international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He is based in San Francisco, where he provides a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. He may be reached at his downtown office: [email protected].
Follow SCMR on social media.
@SupplyChainManagementReview on Facebook
@SCMR on Twitter
SCMR on Linkedin
Subscribe
Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Editors’ Picks
