The importance of relevance to the P and L Statement cannot be overstated. If you report procurement results that can’t be found on the Income Statement, your credibility will suffer greatly. In fact, as a CPO, I literally banned the word “savings” from our practice. Either a result was cost reduction, or it was cost avoidance. But never was it labeled by the vague term “savings.”
To have the best chance of credibility with your internal clients, you need to build a framework and tracking system that is P & L relevant – and that means tracking and reporting only cost reduction from operating costs.

This framework is one of the foundations for a credible approach to reporting the results from the efforts of your teams.
More in my next posting.
(Note: portions of this blog series are based on the author’s new book “Next Level Supply Management Excellence” – a sequel to the bestselling book “Straight to the Bottom Line® )
SC
MR

Latest Supply Chain News
- Supply chain resilience isn’t a data problem; it’s a judgment problem
- Beyond the hype: Building flexible and scalable supply chains in a VUCA world
- Why your supply chain risk management plan will fail
- When component verification becomes operational
- Caught between a rock and a hard place: Mapping your supply chain
- More News
Latest Resources

Explore
Latest Supply Chain News
- Why companies blame the wrong supplier … and miss the real failure
- NextGen Supply Chain Conference unveils agenda focused on AI, execution and the future of leadership
- From fragmented negotiations to coordinated negotiation performance: an AI-enabled approach
- Supply chain resilience isn’t a data problem; it’s a judgment problem
- Beyond the hype: Building flexible and scalable supply chains in a VUCA world
- Why your supply chain risk management plan will fail
- More latest news
Latest Resources

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.

Editors’ Picks
