The importance of relevance to the P and L Statement cannot be overstated. If you report procurement results that can’t be found on the Income Statement, your credibility will suffer greatly. In fact, as a CPO, I literally banned the word “savings” from our practice. Either a result was cost reduction, or it was cost avoidance. But never was it labeled by the vague term “savings.”
To have the best chance of credibility with your internal clients, you need to build a framework and tracking system that is P & L relevant – and that means tracking and reporting only cost reduction from operating costs.

This framework is one of the foundations for a credible approach to reporting the results from the efforts of your teams.
More in my next posting.
(Note: portions of this blog series are based on the author’s new book “Next Level Supply Management Excellence” – a sequel to the bestselling book “Straight to the Bottom Line® )
SC
MR

Latest Supply Chain News
- How I vibe-coded an S&OP app in 30 hours
- The AI regulation gap: Risk, cost, and competitive advantage
- PepsiCo moves its startup sustainability program from pilots to operational scale across Asia Pacific
- Eli Lilly’s Mar Gimeno to keynote at NextGen Supply Chain Conference 2026
- Agentic coding and the future of supply chain leadership
- More News
Latest Podcast

Explore
Latest Supply Chain News
- PepsiCo moves its startup sustainability program from pilots to operational scale across Asia Pacific
- Eli Lilly’s Mar Gimeno to keynote at NextGen Supply Chain Conference 2026
- Agentic coding and the future of supply chain leadership
- From orbit to operations: Winning the race for the earliest disruption signal
- Stop moving boxes, start moving dollars: The new math of global supply chain velocity
- Finding your rhythm: SME supply chain footwork when the rules keep changing
- More latest news
Latest Resources

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.

Editors’ Picks
