By Chong Zhang
Editor’s Note: The SCM thesis Predicting Semiconductor Component Lead Time for an Oil and Gas Company: A Dynamic Safety Stock Model with Machine Learning was authored by Chong Zhang and supervised by Dr. Thomas Koch ([email protected]). For more information on the research, please contact the thesis supervisor.
The fluctuation of semiconductor delivery time presents a persistent challenge to different industries. Inaccurate forecasts of delivery lead time, often deviating significantly from an initial supplier’s promised delivery lead time, can severely disrupt production schedules, escalate manufacturing costs, and undermine carefully orchestrated customer delivery plans. Companies whose business is characterized by volatility and unpredictable lead times need rigorous supply chain management strategies to mitigate risk and ensure operational continuity.
For industries operating within demanding environments, such as oil and gas exploration and production, where high-reliability components are paramount, the consequences of semiconductor supply chain instability are particularly acute. Unexpected delays can have cascading effects throughout the value chain, impacting critical operations ranging from exploring to drilling and production. In this context, the imperative for accurate lead time forecasting and robust inventory management systems has never been greater.
One leading multinational oilfield services company recognized the need for a proactive solution to this pervasive issue. While they had implemented a centralized inventory management system for semiconductor components, two critical vulnerabilities remained unaddressed. First, their system lacked a dynamic safety stock mechanism to mitigate the impact of fluctuating lead times. Second, the supplier-quoted lead time, forming the foundation of their planning process, proved consistently unreliable. This combination presented a significant risk, as downtime in this industry can translate into millions of dollars in lost revenue.
Decoding the endogenous and exogenous data
Determined to unravel the enigma of fluctuations in semiconductor delivery lead times, the company embarked on an ambitious data-driven initiative. They delved into a decade’s worth of historical purchasing data, meticulously analyzing a vast array of factors potentially influencing lead times. This comprehensive approach extended beyond internal metrics, encompassing external variables such as global economic indicators, industry-specific indices, and even component-level specifications.
The objective was clear: to uncover hidden correlations and predictive patterns within the data that could anticipate the potential lead time extensions. However, the complexity of the data demanded a more sophisticated approach than traditional forecasting methods could provide.
The appropriate approach emerged from the realm of machine learning. After rigorous testing of various models, the XGBoost algorithm emerged as the clear frontrunner, demonstrating an exceptional ability to navigate complex datasets and extract subtle patterns. The insights gleaned from this analysis were revelatory. One was that factors like the S&P 500 Semiconductor and Semiconductor Equipment indices, despite being related to semiconductor companies, do not demonstrate a significant impact on lead-time prediction. In contrast, the S&P indices for technology, healthcare, aerospace, and communication, which include companies with substantial semiconductor consumption like Apple, GE Health, Boeing, and Cisco, included key features that influence delivery lead times.
This discovery illuminated the interconnectedness of the global semiconductor market. A surge in smartphone sales or increased demand for medical imaging equipment could reverberate through the supply chain, impacting lead times for components utilized for oil and gas equipment.
A dynamic solution against the disruption
Armed with its powerful predictive model, the company was not satisfied with simply forecasting lead times more accurately. It took it a step further, developing a dynamic safety stock model that adapts in real time to changing market environments.
This innovative approach considers both the predicted lead time and its potential variability. Instead of relying on static safety stock levels, the system continuously adjusts inventory targets. When the model predicts longer lead times or increased volatility, safety stock levels automatically increase. Conversely, during periods of stability, the system can optimize inventory levels to reduce carrying costs.
The impact was significant. Simulations showed a dramatic reduction in inventory holding cost caused by component shortages. The supply chain procurement team and production planners gained a newfound confidence in their ability to predict lead times, manage semiconductor supply volatility, and optimize inventory levels. The ripple effects extended throughout the supply chain, with improved on-time delivery rates and reduced component shortage costs.
By leveraging the data-driven approach and machine learning algorithms, the company transformed its semiconductor components inventory management from a reactive to a proactive position. The new capability ensures consistent production schedules and timely project deliveries. The success of this initiative has demonstrated that machine learning algorithms can be an effective solution for lead-time forecasting in the oil and gas industry even with limited data availability.
Every year, approximately 80 students in the MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics’s (MIT CTL) Master of Supply Chain Management (SCM) program complete approximately 45 one-year research projects.
These students are early-career business professionals from multiple countries, with two to 10 years of experience in the industry. Most of the research projects are chosen, sponsored by, and carried out in collaboration with multinational corporations. Joint teams that include MIT SCM students and MIT CTL faculty work on real-world problems. In this series, they summarize a selection of the latest SCM research.
SC
MR


More Inventory Planning
- From reactive to proactive: Mitigating semiconductor delivery in an oil & gas company
- Deliver fresher food: A pick-to-zero transformation for retailers
- Raw material shortages have abated, but some lingering issues remain
- Why we can’t ignore inventory rightsizing in industrial sectors
- Enhance Your 3PL Operations in 2024 with the Latest Technology Solutions
- More Inventory Planning
What's Related in Inventory Planning

Explore
Topics
Procurement & Sourcing News
- Hexnode CEO: The supply chain still doesn’t know how to protect itself
- The trade-off between affordability and availability
- S&P Global Market Intelligence reports January import growth, with February and March looking not as certain
- DHL Express survey finds shipping sustainability important, but few are investing
- AI is opening new opportunities to upskill procurement professionals
- Services sector output rises for seventh straight month in February, reports ISM
- More Procurement & Sourcing
Latest Procurement & Sourcing Resources

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.

Editors’ Picks



