Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.
May-June 2021
Indulge me for a minute, while I lead a cheer for our profession. I wrote my column for the January 2021 issue of SCMR one Sunday morning after watching the first trucks full of vaccine roll out of a Pfizer plant in Michigan, headed for a UPS sortation depot. I felt an incredible sense of optimism for the country, and pride in the role that we, as supply chain managers, were going to play to combat a pandemic. Supply chain as in the spotlight, and on that morning, it was for all the right reasons. Fast forward to late April 2021. Browse this issue archive.Need Help? Contact customer service 847-559-7581 More options
Existing academic and industry research, which is largely based on survey findings, suggests that a sizable group of consumers want to support social justice and environmental conservation through their shopping decisions. But to what extent does this support translate into sales of sustainable products? The MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics carried out research in one particular market—coffee—to find out.
According to our study of coffee purchases, it seems that consumers are not strongly committed to Fair Trade or organic labels given the current offerings at grocery stores. We found that the price premium—the typical reason that consumers don’t buy sustainable products—is not the sole reason consumers turn away from this type of purchase.
However, the news is not all bad for purveyors of sustainable coffee products. Our findings also suggest that certified sustainable coffee can be more competitive if consumers have a wider variety of certified coffees to choose from than what is currently available. In other words, companies need to be more innovative in the way they sell sustainable alternatives to traditional coffee varieties.
Reality gaps
In an effort to attract elusive socially- and environmentally-conscious buyers, some companies have invested in ways to improve and communicate their supply chain sustainability practices. A common approach is to use third-party certification labels to differentiate a company’s products.
This complete article is available to subscribers only.
Log in now for full access or start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.
SC
MR
Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.
May-June 2021
Indulge me for a minute, while I lead a cheer for our profession. I wrote my column for the January 2021 issue of SCMR one Sunday morning after watching the first trucks full of vaccine roll out of a Pfizer plant in… Browse this issue archive. Access your online digital edition. Download a PDF file of the May-June 2021 issue.Existing academic and industry research, which is largely based on survey findings, suggests that a sizable group of consumers want to support social justice and environmental conservation through their shopping decisions. But to what extent does this support translate into sales of sustainable products? The MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics carried out research in one particular market—coffee—to find out.
According to our study of coffee purchases, it seems that consumers are not strongly committed to Fair Trade or organic labels given the current offerings at grocery stores. We found that the price premium—the typical reason that consumers don’t buy sustainable products—is not the sole reason consumers turn away from this type of purchase.
However, the news is not all bad for purveyors of sustainable coffee products. Our findings also suggest that certified sustainable coffee can be more competitive if consumers have a wider variety of certified coffees to choose from than what is currently available. In other words, companies need to be more innovative in the way they sell sustainable alternatives to traditional coffee varieties.
Reality gaps
In an effort to attract elusive socially- and environmentally-conscious buyers, some companies have invested in ways to improve and communicate their supply chain sustainability practices. A common approach is to use third-party certification labels to differentiate a company’s products.
SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article.
SC
MR


Latest Supply Chain News
- FSMA Rule 204: Why digital traceability can’t wait
- Tariff tensions ease as U.S., China cut deal
- Supply chain disruptions can’t be divorced from the other risks facing us today
- Balancing risk and efficiency: Strategies for global supply chain realignment
- Agentic AI poised to take supply chain decision-making to the next level
- More News
Latest Resources

Explore
Topics
Procurement & Sourcing News
- FSMA Rule 204: Why digital traceability can’t wait
- Tariff tensions ease as U.S., China cut deal
- Supply chain disruptions can’t be divorced from the other risks facing us today
- Balancing risk and efficiency: Strategies for global supply chain realignment
- Maintaining accurate country-of-origin certifications under federal awards amidst increasing tariffs
- How supply chain leadership drives business growth, competitive advantage
- More Procurement & Sourcing
Latest Procurement & Sourcing Resources

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.

Editors’ Picks



