•   Exclusive

Reimagine your reverse supply chain: Minimize new 3Rs for environmental sustainability

By holding both ends of the supply chain accountable, sustainability efforts are more likely to bear satisfactory results and significantly reduce the burden on Mother Nature.

Subscriber: Log Out

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

This is an excerpt of the original article. It was written for the May-June 2023 edition of Supply Chain Management Review. The full article is available to current subscribers.

May-June 2023

If you were dropped onto this planet and landed at McCormick Place in the heart of Chicago in the middle of March, you would probably conclude that planet Earth had been overrun by robots. Everywhere you turned on the ProMat conference floor, there was a robot lifting something, putting something away, or carrying something to another location. But, despite a conference hall overrun by technology, the on-the-ground reality is a bit different. Not so long ago, commercial real estate firm Prologis estimated the number of facilities with any type of automation at about 10%. But that is changing—quickly. A recent report from JLL found that one-in-two…
Browse this issue archive.
Already a subscriber? Access full edition now.

Need Help?
Contact customer service
847-559-7581   More options
Not a subscriber? Start your magazine subscription.

Reduce, reuse, recycle. These 3Rs are commonly known steps toward waste management and environmental sustainability. However, they are not adequate toward countering the increasing amounts of waste generated by complex global supply chains. These 3Rs are predominantly post-mortem efforts that force a great deal of responsibility on the consumers rather than on the producers themselves.

Reverse supply chains ought to be reimagined for sustainability. We propose a design framework that minimizes the new 3Rs—refuse, recall, and returns—which in turn complement the existing reduce, reuse, and recycle initiatives for effective environmental impact.

Is the status quo—maximize reduce, reuse and recycle initiatives—adequate?

Efforts to design sustainable supply chains are receiving traction globally. The status quo focuses on a post-mortem strategy built on the 3Rs—reduce, reuse, recycle.

While these are laudable sustainability efforts, they may not produce the desired results for the environment. A finding by Columbia Climate School indicated that of these 3Rs, most consumers focus on recycling initiatives. Unfortunately, many such recycled items ultimately end up in landfills and choke the environment due to contamination, unfit for further use. A similar study by the United Nations pointed out that recycling is not going to be adequate to contain the accelerating erosion of the environment. This prompts a need to transform the way we manage supply chains.

While forward supply chains are being smartly streamlined and are part of sustainability initiatives, refuse, recall, and returns are complex loops that have a very high environmental impact, but are difficult to address.

A new design approach is required.

Refuse that includes obsoletes, single-use packaging materials, plastic containers, information materials and even QR codes that get printed for tracking contribute to a significant amount of municipal waste. Per an EPA statistic, containers and packaging contribute to an astonishingly higher portion—more than a quarter—of the municipal solid waste.

This complete article is available to subscribers only. Log in now for full access or start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.

 

 

SC
MR

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

From the May-June 2023 edition of Supply Chain Management Review.

May-June 2023

If you were dropped onto this planet and landed at McCormick Place in the heart of Chicago in the middle of March, you would probably conclude that planet Earth had been overrun by robots. Everywhere you turned on the…
Browse this issue archive.
Access your online digital edition.
Download a PDF file of the May-June 2023 issue.

Reduce, reuse, recycle. These 3Rs are commonly known steps toward waste management and environmental sustainability. However, they are not adequate toward countering the increasing amounts of waste generated by complex global supply chains. These 3Rs are predominantly post-mortem efforts that force a great deal of responsibility on the consumers rather than on the producers themselves.

Reverse supply chains ought to be reimagined for sustainability. We propose a design framework that minimizes the new 3Rs—refuse, recall, and returns—which in turn complement the existing reduce, reuse, and recycle initiatives for effective environmental impact.

Is the status quo—maximize reduce, reuse and recycle initiatives—adequate?

Efforts to design sustainable supply chains are receiving traction globally. The status quo focuses on a post-mortem strategy built on the 3Rs—reduce, reuse, recycle.

While these are laudable sustainability efforts, they may not produce the desired results for the environment. A finding by Columbia Climate School indicated that of these 3Rs, most consumers focus on recycling initiatives. Unfortunately, many such recycled items ultimately end up in landfills and choke the environment due to contamination, unfit for further use. A similar study by the United Nations pointed out that recycling is not going to be adequate to contain the accelerating erosion of the environment. This prompts a need to transform the way we manage supply chains.

While forward supply chains are being smartly streamlined and are part of sustainability initiatives, refuse, recall, and returns are complex loops that have a very high environmental impact, but are difficult to address.

A new design approach is required.

Refuse that includes obsoletes, single-use packaging materials, plastic containers, information materials and even QR codes that get printed for tracking contribute to a significant amount of municipal waste. Per an EPA statistic, containers and packaging contribute to an astonishingly higher portion—more than a quarter—of the municipal solid waste.

SC
MR

Latest Resources
nGroup improves productivity by 130% with LocusBots & Optoro
nGroup enhanced its warehouse efficiency by integrating Locus Robotics and Optoro, achieving a 130% productivity boost, fewer errors, and safer…
Download

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service

Press Releases

Press Releases Submit Press Release