“Debt is King” For Many Top Players in Today’s Global Supply Chain

Top Performers Hold Half the Inventory, Collect from Customers Two Weeks Faster, and Pay Suppliers More Than Two Weeks Slower

Subscriber: Log Out

In today's business world, the old adage “Cash is King” is being replaced by “Debt is King,” according to the results of the 17th annual working capital survey from REL a division of The Hackett Group, Inc.

The study, which examines the working capital performance of nearly 1000 of the largest public companies in the U.S., found that companies continue to take on alarming amounts of debt. Debt rose by over 9 percent in 2014 to nearly $4.6 trillion, with companies leveraging low interest rates to fund increased investment activities. At the same time, companies once again made almost no improvement in working capital management, doing little to generate cash internally by optimizing how they collect from customers, pay suppliers, and manage inventory.

Companies that doubled their debt or more since 2007 saw their working capital performance worsen dramatically, REL's research found, while companies that decreased their debt over the same period saw a significant improvement.

Cash on hand decreased for the first time in a decade in 2014, largely due to expenditures on acquisitions, according to REL's research. But it has risen by 74 percent since 2007, and at $932 billion remains near its all-time high. Capex spending also continued its comeback, rising by 11 percent in one year.

For 2014, REL found that companies in the study could improve their cash flow by over $1 trillion, or 6 percent of the U.S. gross domestic product, by matching the performance of top companies in their industry. Inventory optimization represents the largest share of this opportunity. Top performers, who are seven times faster at converting cash into cash than typical companies, now hold less than half the inventory (22.2 days vs 50.7 days), while collecting from customers over two weeks faster (24.8 days vs 42.6 days) and paying suppliers 40 percent slower (55.4 days vs 39.5 days). CCC improved only marginally in 2014, shrinking by .7 days or 2 percent.

“U.S. companies are clearly enjoying all the benefits of the recent economic acceleration,” says REL Associate Principal Analisa DeHaro. “However, their addiction to debt, and their apathy toward true cash flow management, is very disconcerting.”

Today, adds DeHaro, money is cheap.

“But there's no question that interest rates will rise, possibly sooner rather than later. And when that happens, companies focused on optimizing their CCC will be best positioned to mitigate their risk, continue to fund investment, and outperform their peers,” she says.

For the first time this year, REL shifted from its historic calculation of Days Working Capital (DWC) to measure how effective companies are at receivables, payables, and inventory, to using Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) as its preferred metric. CCC more accurately quantifies the time each dollar is tied up in the buying, production, and sales process before it is converted to cash through collection from customers. CCC has improved by only 3.9 percent (1 day) since 2007.

While some companies are focused on improving working capital performance, even those find it challenging to sustain improvements. Only 10 percent of the companies in the REL survey improved working capital performance for three years running, and only 2 percent improved it for five years running. Five companies showed remarkable results, improving working capital for seven years in a row: AmerisourceBergen, Diebold, EQT, Goodyear, and Masco.

Several industries, including technology hardware and biotechnology, appeared to go against the trend, significantly improving working capital performance in 2014. Industries that showed the largest decline in working capital performance in 2014 included diversified consumer goods, automobiles, and construction and engineering.

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Talking Supply Chain: Understanding the FTC’s ban on noncompetes
Crowell & Moring law partner Stefan Meisner joined the Talking Supply Chain podcast to discuss the recent decision by the Federal Trade…
Listen in

About the Author

Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson

Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor specializing in international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He is based in San Francisco, where he provides a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. He may be reached at his downtown office: [email protected].

View Patrick 's author profile.

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service