The importance of relevance to the P and L Statement cannot be overstated. If you report procurement results that can’t be found on the Income Statement, your credibility will suffer greatly. In fact, as a CPO, I literally banned the word “savings” from our practice. Either a result was cost reduction, or it was cost avoidance. But never was it labeled by the vague term “savings.”
To have the best chance of credibility with your internal clients, you need to build a framework and tracking system that is P & L relevant – and that means tracking and reporting only cost reduction from operating costs.

This framework is one of the foundations for a credible approach to reporting the results from the efforts of your teams.
More in my next posting.
(Note: portions of this blog series are based on the author’s new book “Next Level Supply Management Excellence” – a sequel to the bestselling book “Straight to the Bottom Line® )
SC
MR

Latest Supply Chain News
- NextGen 2026 Keynotes announced
- How Do You Really Do It?: Get ROI from digital transformation
- How industrial real estate decisions are shaping supply chain performance
- Developing supply chain talent for new product development
- Finance as a transformation catalyst: A How-To guide for supply chain finance leaders
- More News
Latest Resources

Explore
Latest Supply Chain News
- Developing supply chain talent for new product development
- Finance as a transformation catalyst: A How-To guide for supply chain finance leaders
- Procurement’s Moneyball Moment: Connecting Strategy, Sourcing, and Supply Chain Reality
- AI won’t fix a broken supply chain foundation
- How I vibe-coded an S&OP app in 30 hours
- The AI regulation gap: Risk, cost, and competitive advantage
- More latest news
Latest Resources

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.

Editors’ Picks
