Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.
March-April 2019
A few days ago, a colleague sent me “The Death of Supply Chain Management,” an article in the Harvard Business Review. If the title wasn’t enough to grab my attention, the last sentence in the first paragraph had me checking out job openings on LinkedIn: “Within five years to 10 years, the supply chain function may be obsolete, replaced by a smoothly running, selfregulating utility that ….. requires very little human attention.” Read more carefully, what the authors are really arguing is that as NextGen technologies find their place in our organizations, the role of the supply chain manager, including procurement managers, is going to… Browse this issue archive.Need Help? Contact customer service 847-559-7581 More options
Machine Learning (ML) models power technologies that recommend movies we might like, assist in detecting health risks, suggest routes to dodge traffic and beat world-class chess players. Over the last decade, we have witnessed an explosion of emerging ML-enabled solutions across industries from health care to supply chains, enhanced by algorithms capable of making better predictions based on past data. Yet, as the range of industry problems in which ML systems can play a role continues to expand, it is essential to separate the hype from the reality, and understand misconceptions about ML as well as its limitations. Companies also need to be aware of the skills they require to harness the benefits of ML.
Common ML misconceptions
In his seminal paper “Computing Machinery and Intelligence” published in 1950, Alan Turing introduced a test to assess whether or not a machine is capable of learning, of representing knowledge and of performing other cognitive functions generally associated with the human mind. Building on philosophical and technical arguments, Turing’s paper laid the foundations of modern ML, and more generally, of Artificial Intelligence.
The ML boom in recent years may mislead us to believe that ML systems are new. As the Turing paper shows, the scientific community has been developing this field for more than 60 years.

This complete article is available to subscribers only.
Log in now for full access or start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.
SC
MR
Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.
March-April 2019
A few days ago, a colleague sent me “The Death of Supply Chain Management,” an article in the Harvard Business Review. If the title wasn’t enough to grab my attention, the last sentence in the first paragraph… Browse this issue archive. Access your online digital edition. Download a PDF file of the March-April 2019 issue.Machine Learning (ML) models power technologies that recommend movies we might like, assist in detecting health risks, suggest routes to dodge traffic and beat world-class chess players. Over the last decade, we have witnessed an explosion of emerging ML-enabled solutions across industries from health care to supply chains, enhanced by algorithms capable of making better predictions based on past data. Yet, as the range of industry problems in which ML systems can play a role continues to expand, it is essential to separate the hype from the reality, and understand misconceptions about ML as well as its limitations. Companies also need to be aware of the skills they require to harness the benefits of ML.
Common ML misconceptions
In his seminal paper “Computing Machinery and Intelligence” published in 1950, Alan Turing introduced a test to assess whether or not a machine is capable of learning, of representing knowledge and of performing other cognitive functions generally associated with the human mind. Building on philosophical and technical arguments, Turing's paper laid the foundations of modern ML, and more generally, of Artificial Intelligence.
The ML boom in recent years may mislead us to believe that ML systems are new. As the Turing paper shows, the scientific community has been developing this field for more than 60 years.
SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article.
SC
MR

More Events
- Eli Lilly’s Mar Gimeno to keynote at NextGen Supply Chain Conference 2026
- NextGen extends 2026 award, speaker submission deadlines amid strong industry interest
- Tractor Supply to receive NextGen Supply Chain Visionary Award
- NextGen revamps awards for 2026, opens submissions
- NextGen Supply Chain Conference 2026 opens speaker submission process
- NextGen Supply Chain Conference returns to Nashville in 2026 with focus on innovation, talent, and transformation
- More Events
Latest Podcast

Explore
Topics
Software & Technology News
- Eli Lilly’s Mar Gimeno to keynote at NextGen Supply Chain Conference 2026
- Agentic coding and the future of supply chain leadership
- Your supply chain automation should trade like a hedge fund
- Why trust, flexibility, and execution now matter more than speed
- Tech suppliers need more responsible leaders
- NextGen extends 2026 award, speaker submission deadlines amid strong industry interest
- More Software & Technology
Latest Software & Technology Resources

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.

Editors’ Picks

