Lean Forward: Closing the Loop Between Planning and Execution
What operations executives really think, but don’t say aloud.
Lean practitioners are often skeptical of the ability of demand and supply chain planning to drive improved performance across the supply chain, preferring execution and lean levers. The reality is that planning is mathematical and abstract, and too often the results do not reflect reality. Lean execution, on the other hand, is experiential and the results are often directly visible.
Yet the real truth is more nuanced and the case for planning more compelling than most practitioners and executives are able to make a case for. It calls for real investments in process capability development, tools, and technology, and requires an organization to engage cross-functionally to tackle tradeoffs across the supply chain.
Even more fundamental is that many lean operational techniques depend on robust forward demand and supply chain plans to deliver results. Too frequently we see our clients drive the supply chain and inventory positioning based on run rate or backward-looking data. Without a robust plan, lean execution quickly falls prey to parts chasing, production and sequencing bottlenecks, and loss of efficiency. Lean execution does what it’s designed to do—react. However, lean execution needs additional help in environments characterized by higher mix, seasonality, or life cycle ramps, where the ability to execute must be correctly sized based on anticipated market level demand.
This complete article is available to subscribers
only. Click on Log In Now at the top of this article for full access. Or, Start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access. |
Latest News
Cargo Shipping Remains on Hold in Baltimore Following Bridge Collapse Maximizing the Bottom Line: The Power of Procurement Baltimore Bridge Collapse Latest Supply Chain Disruption 6 Questions With … Tom Plotkin February and year-to-date U.S. import volume is solid, reports S&P Global Market Intelligence More NewsLatest Resource
2024 Supply Chain Management Readiness Index Lack of predictive view leaving organizations vulnerable to disruptionAll Resources
Download Article PDF |
Lean practitioners are often skeptical of the ability of demand and supply chain planning to drive improved performance across the supply chain, preferring execution and lean levers. The reality is that planning is mathematical and abstract, and too often the results do not reflect reality. Lean execution, on the other hand, is experiential and the results are often directly visible.
Yet the real truth is more nuanced and the case for planning more compelling than most practitioners and executives are able to make a case for. It calls for real investments in process capability development, tools, and technology, and requires an organization to engage cross-functionally to tackle tradeoffs across the supply chain.
Even more fundamental is that many lean operational techniques depend on robust forward demand and supply chain plans to deliver results. Too frequently we see our clients drive the supply chain and inventory positioning based on run rate or backward-looking data. Without a robust plan, lean execution quickly falls prey to parts chasing, production and sequencing bottlenecks, and loss of efficiency. Lean execution does what it’s designed to do—react. However, lean execution needs additional help in environments characterized by higher mix, seasonality, or life cycle ramps, where the ability to execute must be correctly sized based on anticipated market level demand.
SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article. |
Subscribe to Supply Chain Management Review Magazine!
Subscribe today. Don't Miss Out!Get in-depth coverage from industry experts with proven techniques for cutting supply chain costs and case studies in supply chain best practices.
Start Your Subscription Today!
Article Topics
It’s high time to go beyond visibility Driving supply chain flexibility in an uncertain and volatile world View More From this Issue