ISM’s ‘special questions’ focus on strong dollar and low oil prices

Subscriber: Log Out

One of the many interesting facets of the Semiannual Economic Forecast issued by the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) is its “special questions” segment featured at the end of the report.

These questions, which were presented to the ISM's manufacturing and non-manufacturing member respondents, are always topical and relevant to things impacting the industry, and this year was no exception.

The questions for the most recent Semiannual Economic Forecast, which was released last week, included: 1-has the strength of the U.S. dollar had a negative, negligible or positive impact on their organization's profits?; 2-has the net impact of the depressed prices of oil and related commodities been negative, negligible, or positive for their organization's profits; and 3-how would they characterize the combined impact of their organization's profits on the strength of the U.S. dollar and the depressed prices of oil and related commodities.

The first question regarding the strength of the U.S. dollar was divided somewhat evenly among manufacturing respondents, with 32.3 percent saying it had a negative impact on profits, 35.9 percent citing a negligible impact on profits, and 15.7 indicating they were unsure.

The same question posed to non-manufacturing respondents was a bit more staggered, with 12.6 percent citing a negative impact on profits, 44.5 pointing to a negligible impact on profits, and 29.3 being unsure.

Brad Holcomb, chair of the ISM Manufacturing Survey Business Committee, said that many companies actively involved with exporting lament strong dollar, while others with more of an import focus are bullish about it.

“In terms of what this means for manufacturing what might be surprising to some is that less than one-third of our manufacturing respondents cited a negligible impact, with feedback not negative on a whole,” he said.

And Tony Nieves, chair of the ISM Non-Manufacturing Survey Business Committee, said that the impact of the strong U.S. dollar is not as prevalent on the non-manufacturing services side.

“There are not a lot of tangible goods and finished goods exported out of this services sector, as it is more information services, professional scientific and technical services and knowledge management,” he explained. There is more latitude when it comes to pricing that out, and it does not have to be as tied to the value of the dollar compared to overseas currencies making it less impactful there.”

For the second question related to the impact on profits due to the depressed prices of oil and related commodities, roughly one-fifth, or 21.4 percent of manufacturing respondents, said it was having a negative impact on profits, with another 20.5 percent saying it was having a negative impact, 46.4 percent citing positive impact on profits, and 11.6 percent being unsure.

ISM manufacturing chair Holcomb said that with the exception of oil and mining sector respondents, manufacturing is feeling the benefits of largely reduced raw materials prices, which helps to reduce the costs related to running factories.

On the non-manufacturing side, 13.1 percent said low oil and related commodities prices had a negative profit impact, with another 29.8 percent saying it had a negligible impact, 46.1 percent pointing to a positive impact on profits, and 29.3 percent being unsure.

Nieves said low oil prices were far more positive than negative and was transposed into more capital investments as well as over all costs savings, too.

The third and final question relating to the combined impact of a strong dollar and low oil and related commodities expenses were somewhat mixed by sector.

For manufacturing, 27.6 percent cited a negative impact, and 22.2 percent indicated it had a negligible impact, with 33.8 percent saying the combination was positive and 16.4 percent being unsure.

And for non-manufacturing, 13.7 percent pointed to a negative impact, 37.9 percent saying it had a negligible impact, 30 percent said it had a positive impact, with 18.4 percent unsure.

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Talking Supply Chain: Understanding the FTC’s ban on noncompetes
Crowell & Moring law partner Stefan Meisner joined the Talking Supply Chain podcast to discuss the recent decision by the Federal Trade…
Listen in

About the Author

Jeff Berman, Group News Editor
Jeff Berman's Bio Photo

Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis. Contact Jeff Berman

View Jeff's author profile.

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service