Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.
September-October 2023
Best of the best. Best in class. The elite. Whatever terminology you use to describe the top performers in industry, they all have one thing in common: Companies try to emulate them. That is not easy, of course, but honors such as the annual Gartner Supply Chain Top 25 provide a roadmap for firms hoping to reach the upper echelon. As we do each year here at Supply Chain Management Review, our September/October issue dedicates significant real estate to the Gartner Supply Chain Top 25. Why do we do this? Because our mission is to help inform you, the supply chain practitioner, in all the best ways to make your own supply chains more efficient and… Browse this issue archive.Need Help? Contact customer service 847-559-7581 More options
About a year back, the news of artworks created by artificial intelligence (AI) engines became a topic of prolonged debates across the creative communities. In February 2023, Reuters reported that OpenAI’s ChatGPT had become the fastest growing consumer application within just two months of its launch. In the subsequent months, generative AI (Gen AI) swept through the technology industry like a tsunami, disrupted the product roadmap of the major tech brands, and created a phenomenon termed as the “AI gold rush.” Understandably, this technological disruption created a raging interest among supply chain communities.
How can generative AI play a role in supply chain transformation from “chain” to “network?” What are the key differences between traditional AI and generative AI? What are key use cases, risks and limitations, and opportunities to leverage this emerging technology to accelerate supply network performance and competitive advantage?
Leveraging the differences between traditional AI and generative AI
AI and machine learning (ML) have received wide acceptance in several supply chain functions, such as demand predictions, supplier risk assessment, anomaly detections, route optimization, etc.
With the “big bang” arrival of generative AI, the quick reaction from many business and technology leaders was to assess and adopt it to improve supply chain operations. However, in doing so, one of the key differences between traditional AI and generative AI is often overlooked.
Traditional AI models have focused primarily on detecting patterns to predict a future outcome based on past events and real-time signals received from upstream or downstream supply network operations. As an example, traditional AI models can be utilized to predict demand patterns based on weather forecasts. They can predict downstream customer order impacts by sensing upstream supply delay signals and suggest alternatives to minimize impacts.
Alternatively, generative AI focuses on generating digital content that did not exist before. For example, it can be utilized to create a contract document with jurisdiction restrictions for sourcing materials from global suppliers. It can improvise existing content with additional inputs or create an entirely new document considering the reference of existing content.
Traditional AI, in short, focuses on predicting the outcome to a problem based on historical or real-time signals and prescribing alternatives in certain cases. Conversely, generative AI can generate novel content based on the instructions provided by human operators/associates. This primary difference helps leaders to decide on investing in solutions based on traditional AI, generative AI, or combinations of both.
This complete article is available to subscribers only.
Log in now for full access or start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.
SC
MR
Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.
September-October 2023
Best of the best. Best in class. The elite. Whatever terminology you use to describe the top performers in industry, they all have one thing in common: Companies try to emulate them. That is not easy, of course, but… Browse this issue archive. Access your online digital edition. Download a PDF file of the September-October 2023 issue.About a year back, the news of artworks created by artificial intelligence (AI) engines became a topic of prolonged debates across the creative communities. In February 2023, Reuters reported that OpenAI’s ChatGPT had become the fastest growing consumer application within just two months of its launch. In the subsequent months, generative AI (Gen AI) swept through the technology industry like a tsunami, disrupted the product roadmap of the major tech brands, and created a phenomenon termed as the “AI gold rush.” Understandably, this technological disruption created a raging interest among supply chain communities.
How can generative AI play a role in supply chain transformation from “chain” to “network?” What are the key differences between traditional AI and generative AI? What are key use cases, risks and limitations, and opportunities to leverage this emerging technology to accelerate supply network performance and competitive advantage?
Leveraging the differences between traditional AI and generative AI
AI and machine learning (ML) have received wide acceptance in several supply chain functions, such as demand predictions, supplier risk assessment, anomaly detections, route optimization, etc.
With the “big bang” arrival of generative AI, the quick reaction from many business and technology leaders was to assess and adopt it to improve supply chain operations. However, in doing so, one of the key differences between traditional AI and generative AI is often overlooked.
Traditional AI models have focused primarily on detecting patterns to predict a future outcome based on past events and real-time signals received from upstream or downstream supply network operations. As an example, traditional AI models can be utilized to predict demand patterns based on weather forecasts. They can predict downstream customer order impacts by sensing upstream supply delay signals and suggest alternatives to minimize impacts.
Alternatively, generative AI focuses on generating digital content that did not exist before. For example, it can be utilized to create a contract document with jurisdiction restrictions for sourcing materials from global suppliers. It can improvise existing content with additional inputs or create an entirely new document considering the reference of existing content.
Traditional AI, in short, focuses on predicting the outcome to a problem based on historical or real-time signals and prescribing alternatives in certain cases. Conversely, generative AI can generate novel content based on the instructions provided by human operators/associates. This primary difference helps leaders to decide on investing in solutions based on traditional AI, generative AI, or combinations of both.
SC
MR
More Artificial Intelligence
- The year of GenAI
- Nine questions are the key to AI success in building resilient supply chains
- Looking back at NextGen 2024
- AI is moving omnichannel closer to the customer
- The art of winning at supply chain technology: Lessons from managing tech for the largest private trucking fleet in the U.S.
- NextGen Supply Chain Conference set for October 21-23
- More Artificial Intelligence
Latest Podcast
Explore
Topics
Software & Technology News
- 6 Questions With … Joe McManus
- The year of GenAI
- Nine questions are the key to AI success in building resilient supply chains
- Looking back at NextGen 2024
- AI is moving omnichannel closer to the customer
- How technological innovation is paving the way for a carbon-free future in logistics and supply chains
- More Software & Technology