China has the “Made in China 2025” industrial policy aimed at supporting the development of advanced manufacturing technologies. Germany’s industrial policy aims for comparative advantage in the production of high-quality, internationally competitive manufactured goods. Japan’s industrial policy was devised after WWII to promote industrial development by cooperating closely with private firms. Mexico’s industrial policy objective is to liberalize the industrial sector to increase industrial productivity and competitiveness.
American Industrial Policy? Nothing, Nada, Nichts, Rien
America doesn’t have an industrial policy nor any national industrial goals. We’ve been operating under the belief that the free marketplace would drive the need and approach for what to produce in America.
It’s been all about supply and demand and free enterprise. But the global pandemic has been a wake-up call and once again raised the discussion about national industrial policy. Shouldn’t the U.S. government choose particular industries for targeted support? Isn’t it in the national interest to support critical industries such as medical supplies and devices, telecom, rare earth elements, semiconductors, and steel?
There is strong criticism, particularly from conservatives, that an American industrial policy is an attempt to move toward socialism – that the U.S. government picking winners and losers disrupts the free market.
But based on what we have learned from the Coronavirus response, doesn’t it make sense for the U.S. government to take action to protect our vulnerabilities just as we do with farm subsidies?
The opinions on American industrial policy are changing. The pandemic has uncovered our vulnerabilities to produce essential goods such as PPE and pharmaceuticals. But the pandemic plus the on-going Trade War with China has also exposed our vulnerabilities in defense equipment, telecom equipment, rare earth elements, and other industrial products. We are exposed. We need U.S. government support to drive the development and production of these products in America.
What should be included in a national industrial policy?
A national industrial policy should include:
• A well-defined and justified list of products to be supported – a “preferred list” of products. The criteria for being included on this list would have to be related to American essential, critical, and strategic products. An objective review and qualification process (non-political) would have to be established to make the selection fair and appropriate.
• Price controls. Companies benefitting from a national industrial policy should sell their products at a cost-plus specific, regulated margin to protect against profiteering. An objective audit and oversight function must be put in place.
• Tax breaks. The U.S. government should provide tax incentives for companies producing products on the qualified list.
• Low-cost loans. The U.S. government should provide low-interest or no-interest loans and grants to develop new technologies and products on the qualified list.
• Land grants. The U.S. government should provide temporary land grants and property grants to companies producing essential goods, with an ultimate payback period in the future.
• Subsidies. The U.S. government should provide subsidies for the development and production of essential goods for key future technologies.
• Training Credits. Companies should receive training tax credits for training or retraining employees for new required skills and new technologies.
• Buy American. Current “Buy American” regulations should be enhanced and enforced so that local, state, and federal governments are required to always make a good-faith attempt to buy goods made in the U.S. before buying foreign goods.
These kinds of policies will ring the alarm bells for some who believe in a completely free-market economy for America, with no interference from the government. But aren’t we already subsidizing farmers in this way? Americans’ health and safety are at stake and now is the time to consider a national industrial policy to support the needs of our citizens.
SC
MR
Latest Supply Chain News
- Trade in transition: What companies should know
- Procurement’s role to drive innovation, resilience and sustainability continues to evolve
- Six best practices for supply chain organizations to get the most out of younger employees
- Everstream Analytics names 5 supply chain risks for 2025
- Labor shortages remain an ongoing concern in many parts of U.S. manufacturing
- More News
Latest Resources
Explore
Business Management News
- Trade in transition: What companies should know
- Six best practices for supply chain organizations to get the most out of younger employees
- Everstream Analytics names 5 supply chain risks for 2025
- Labor shortages remain an ongoing concern in many parts of U.S. manufacturing
- Refocusing on talent as North American labor faces generational transition
- People first strategies: Key to supply chain transformation in 2025
- More Business Management