•   Exclusive

The Wisdom of Becoming a Preferred Customer

Research and experience tells us that satisfied suppliers are more willing to provide preferential treatment to customers—treatment that can lead directly to market advantage. But what does it take to become a “preferred customer” and capture that edge?

Subscriber: Log Out

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

This is an excerpt of the original article. It was written for the November 2012 edition of Supply Chain Management Review. The full article is available to current subscribers.

November 2012

We’ve all heard about the advantage of being a preferred customer to your buyers. Now we learn that it’s just as important to become a good customer to your key suppliers. This article explains the benefits of becoming a preferred customer and lays out the actions needed to become one.
Browse this issue archive.
Already a subscriber? Access full edition now.

Need Help?
Contact customer service
847-559-7581   More options
Not a subscriber? Start your magazine subscription.

The one constant that executive leaders will always face is a relentless pressure to improve corporate performance. Enlightened leaders understand that the link between positive relationships with suppliers and improved corporate performance is a strengthening rather than weakening one. And, these leaders understand that by satisfying the diverse needs of their suppliers, their firm stands a better chance of receiving preferential treatment from suppliers compared with firms with less satisfied suppliers. Consider the following high-profile examples.

Ford and Toyota are competing to become market leaders in the production of hybrid vehicles. As part of their development efforts both companies outsourced the production of a complex hybrid transmission system to the same supplier. As market demand for hybrid vehicles increased, Ford executives complained publicly that the transmission supplier favored Toyota when supplying transmission systems.1 Unfortunately, a demand for transmissions that exceeds the supply of transmissions prohibits the supplier from supporting the demands of both companies. What should be obvious here is that one company became the preferred customer while the other did not.

In another example that gained widespread attention, Airbus publicly accused General Electric of favoring Boeing during the development of engine technology for the next generation of commercial airplanes, a market estimated to be worth several hundred billion dollars.2 As an Airbus executive complained: “The problem we have with GE is they go to Boeing and say ‘what kind of engine should we design for your airframe?’ Then they come to Airbus and say ‘here is the kind of airframe you need to build to fit our engine.’” Complicating matters is the fact that the largest version of Airbus’ next generation of planes will compete with the largest version of a Boeing model (the 777) where GE is the exclusive engine supplier. GE officials say they will not build a new engine for an Airbus plane that will compete against a Boeing plane where GE is the sole supplier.

These two examples highlight the high-stakes competition that is taking place over who will reap the benefits of preferential treatment from suppliers—a competition that can affect success or failure at the business level. Although the examples just presented involve large, wellknown companies, the need to understand what it takes to become a preferred customer is just as critical for smaller and less well-known companies. Smaller companies must not be caught off-guard regarding what they must do to receive preferential treatment from suppliers. Failure to understand this can lead to some serious negative consequences as suppliers explicitly and tacitly decide who their preferred customers are. Because supplier satisfaction with a buying customer is primarily a function of a customer’s behavior and not size (something that will be explained shortly), smaller companies do not have to be at a disadvantage here.

This complete article is available to subscribers only.
Click on Log In Now at the top of this article for full access.
Or, Start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.

Not ready to subscribe, but need this article?
Buy the complete article now. Only $20.00. Instant PDF Download
.
Access the complete issue of Supply Chain Management Review magazine featuring
this article including every word, chart and table exactly as it appeared in the magazine.

SC
MR

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

From the November 2012 edition of Supply Chain Management Review.

November 2012

We’ve all heard about the advantage of being a preferred customer to your buyers. Now we learn that it’s just as important to become a good customer to your key suppliers. This article explains the benefits of…
Browse this issue archive.
Access your online digital edition.
Download a PDF file of the November 2012 issue.

Download Article PDF

The one constant that executive leaders will always face is a relentless pressure to improve corporate performance. Enlightened leaders understand that the link between positive relationships with suppliers and improved corporate performance is a strengthening rather than weakening one. And, these leaders understand that by satisfying the diverse needs of their suppliers, their firm stands a better chance of receiving preferential treatment from suppliers compared with firms with less satisfied suppliers. Consider the following high-profile examples.

Ford and Toyota are competing to become market leaders in the production of hybrid vehicles. As part of their development efforts both companies outsourced the production of a complex hybrid transmission system to the same supplier. As market demand for hybrid vehicles increased, Ford executives complained publicly that the transmission supplier favored Toyota when supplying transmission systems.1 Unfortunately, a demand for transmissions that exceeds the supply of transmissions prohibits the supplier from supporting the demands of both companies. What should be obvious here is that one company became the preferred customer while the other did not.

In another example that gained widespread attention, Airbus publicly accused General Electric of favoring Boeing during the development of engine technology for the next generation of commercial airplanes, a market estimated to be worth several hundred billion dollars.2 As an Airbus executive complained: “The problem we have with GE is they go to Boeing and say ‘what kind of engine should we design for your airframe?’ Then they come to Airbus and say ‘here is the kind of airframe you need to build to fit our engine.’” Complicating matters is the fact that the largest version of Airbus’ next generation of planes will compete with the largest version of a Boeing model (the 777) where GE is the exclusive engine supplier. GE officials say they will not build a new engine for an Airbus plane that will compete against a Boeing plane where GE is the sole supplier.

These two examples highlight the high-stakes competition that is taking place over who will reap the benefits of preferential treatment from suppliers—a competition that can affect success or failure at the business level. Although the examples just presented involve large, wellknown companies, the need to understand what it takes to become a preferred customer is just as critical for smaller and less well-known companies. Smaller companies must not be caught off-guard regarding what they must do to receive preferential treatment from suppliers. Failure to understand this can lead to some serious negative consequences as suppliers explicitly and tacitly decide who their preferred customers are. Because supplier satisfaction with a buying customer is primarily a function of a customer’s behavior and not size (something that will be explained shortly), smaller companies do not have to be at a disadvantage here.

SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article.

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Talking Supply Chain: Doomsday never arrives for Baltimore bridge collapse impacts
The collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key bridge brought doomsday headlines for the supply chain. But the reality has been something less…
Listen in

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service