Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.
March-April 2023
In June 2013, Frank Quinn stepped down as the only editorial director Supply Chain Management Review had ever known. “In thinking about those whom I’m indebted to for the success of SCMR over 16 years, there is one constituency that must rank first on the list—you, the reader,” Frank wrote, as he handed over the reins to Bob Trebilcock. Now, Bob has done the same, handing over the reins to the next generation. I am very proud to be that next generation. In a farewell letter of sorts, Bob wrote that he was the “old” and I as the “new.” Nothing could be further from the truth. There is no old or new, only continuity. That continuity is… Browse this issue archive.Need Help? Contact customer service 847-559-7581 More options
This is my annual update on oil that began with my first Insights column: “Is your supply chain addicted to oil?” (Jan./Feb. 2007). Since, I’ve focused on the price of oil because freight costs are a sizable (and controllable) portion of supply chain costs. Also, because it appeared that oil prices would rise over time, it was obvious that supply chains would have to be more energy-efficient and much less dependent on oil. Initially the tagline was “supply chains needed to slow down” because highly responsive chains were energy inefficient. Furthermore, once there were climate concerns, oil got a “dirty name”—as a polluting CO2 fuel—that became another important reason to squeeze oil out of supply chains.
My last update asked: Where’s the plan?
The last oil update was titled: “Oil update: Where’s the global energy plan?” (Jan./Feb. 2022). In it, I was concerned that there appeared to be a lack of a coordinated global energy strategy to wean economies off their addiction to fossil fuels. I came to this realization after watching an interchange between host Fareed Zakaria and Tom Friedman, a New York Times columnist, on CNN’s GPS show (Oct. 10, 2021). They discussed Mr. Friedman’s column, “A Scary Energy Winter is Coming. Don’t Blame the Greens” (New York Times, Oct. 5, 2021). It included a discussion about the fact that natural gas prices were up 500% in Europe, and up worldwide as well.
My understanding (up to that time) was that there was a tacit agreement that there was a global strategy to move away from fossil fuels, by first using natural gas as a bridge fuel to replace almost all coal, and then oil use. Eventually replacing natural gas with renewables and other non-polluting energy sources.
This complete article is available to subscribers only.
Log in now for full access or start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.
SC
MR
Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.
March-April 2023
In June 2013, Frank Quinn stepped down as the only editorial director Supply Chain Management Review had ever known. “In thinking about those whom I’m indebted to for the success of SCMR over 16 years, there is… Browse this issue archive. Access your online digital edition. Download a PDF file of the March-April 2023 issue.This is my annual update on oil that began with my first Insights column: “Is your supply chain addicted to oil?” (Jan./Feb. 2007). Since, I’ve focused on the price of oil because freight costs are a sizable (and controllable) portion of supply chain costs. Also, because it appeared that oil prices would rise over time, it was obvious that supply chains would have to be more energy-efficient and much less dependent on oil. Initially the tagline was “supply chains needed to slow down” because highly responsive chains were energy inefficient. Furthermore, once there were climate concerns, oil got a “dirty name”—as a polluting CO2 fuel—that became another important reason to squeeze oil out of supply chains.
My last update asked: Where’s the plan?
The last oil update was titled: “Oil update: Where’s the global energy plan?” (Jan./Feb. 2022). In it, I was concerned that there appeared to be a lack of a coordinated global energy strategy to wean economies off their addiction to fossil fuels. I came to this realization after watching an interchange between host Fareed Zakaria and Tom Friedman, a New York Times columnist, on CNN’s GPS show (Oct. 10, 2021). They discussed Mr. Friedman’s column, “A Scary Energy Winter is Coming. Don’t Blame the Greens” (New York Times, Oct. 5, 2021). It included a discussion about the fact that natural gas prices were up 500% in Europe, and up worldwide as well.
My understanding (up to that time) was that there was a tacit agreement that there was a global strategy to move away from fossil fuels, by first using natural gas as a bridge fuel to replace almost all coal, and then oil use. Eventually replacing natural gas with renewables and other non-polluting energy sources.
SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article.
SC
MR
Latest Supply Chain News
- Joseph Esteves named CEO of SGS Maine Pointe
- Employees, employers hold divergent views on upskilling the workforce
- April manufacturing output slides after growing in March
- Q1 sees a solid finish with positive U.S.-bound import growth, notes S&P Global Market Intelligence
- World Trade Centers offers a helping hand to create resilient, interconnected supply chains
- More News
Latest Podcast
Explore
Procurement & Sourcing News
- April manufacturing output slides after growing in March
- World Trade Centers offers a helping hand to create resilient, interconnected supply chains
- Bridging the ESG gap in supply chain management: From ambition to action
- Israel, Ukraine aid package to increase pressure on aerospace and defense supply chains
- How CPG brands can deliver on supplier diversity promises
- How S&OP provides the answer to in-demand products
- More Procurement & Sourcing