•   Exclusive

Oil update: The same, for now

It will always be prudent to reduce the use of carbon-based energy sources by making your supply chains as energy-efficient as possible.

Subscriber: Log Out

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

This is an excerpt of the original article. It was written for the January-February 2024 edition of Supply Chain Management Review. The full article is available to current subscribers.

January-February 2024

Back in 2019, we seemed on a consistent path to the future. Then COVID-19 arrived on the global scene, and all predictions went out the window. As 2024 begins, everyone wants to know what the year will look like. I predict continued interest in circular supply chains, cybersecurity, visibility, and digital supply chains, to name a few. But I am not alone. So, I’d like to share five things that I am particularly interested in this year.
Browse this issue archive.
Already a subscriber? Access full edition now.

Need Help?
Contact customer service
847-559-7581   More options
Not a subscriber? Start your magazine subscription.

This is my annual update on oil that began with my first Insights column: “Is your supply chain addicted to oil?” (Jan./Feb. 2007). Since, I’ve focused on the price of oil because freight costs are a sizable (and controllable) portion of supply chain costs. Also, because it appeared that oil prices would rise over time, it was obvious that supply chains would have to be more energy-efficient and much less dependent on oil. Initially, the tagline was “supply chains needed to slow down” because highly responsive chains were energy inefficient. Furthermore, once there were climate concerns, oil got a “dirty name”—as a polluting CO2 fuel—that became another important reason to squeeze oil out of supply chains.

As the title of this column suggests, things appear to be the same for a while in the turbulent oil/energy markets. The titles of my last four updates that follow tell most of the story of the recent past.

  • “Oil Update: Fracking challenged with cheaper oil” (2020).
  • “Oil Update: Still need fracking?” (2021).
  • “Oil update: Where’s the global energy plan?” (2022).
  • “Oil update: We need security plans from policymakers” (2023).

Over the past several decades, shale fracking in the United States played a major role in moving the oil markets away from the too-often political whims of OPEC and other major oil-exporting countries. Fracking, for a while, became a stabilizing factor in moving the market closer to a free market based largely on supply versus demand principles. While pricing did not grow as fast as expected, it was more volatile and reactionary to major economic crashes, wars, and the COVID-19 pandemic. These events caused either demand or supply to significantly change, and with that, oil pricing as well.

Relative to climate change initiatives, my understanding, until recently, was there was a tacit agreement that there was a global strategy to move away from fossil fuels, by first using natural gas as a bridge fuel to replace almost all coal, and then oil use. Eventually replacing natural gas with renewables and other non-polluting energy sources.

This complete article is available to subscribers only. Log in now for full access or start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.

SC
MR

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

From the January-February 2024 edition of Supply Chain Management Review.

January-February 2024

Back in 2019, we seemed on a consistent path to the future. Then COVID-19 arrived on the global scene, and all predictions went out the window. As 2024 begins, everyone wants to know what the year will look like. I…
Browse this issue archive.
Access your online digital edition.
Download a PDF file of the January-February 2024 issue.

Download Article PDF

This is my annual update on oil that began with my first Insights column: “Is your supply chain addicted to oil?” (Jan./Feb. 2007). Since, I’ve focused on the price of oil because freight costs are a sizable (and controllable) portion of supply chain costs. Also, because it appeared that oil prices would rise over time, it was obvious that supply chains would have to be more energy-efficient and much less dependent on oil. Initially, the tagline was “supply chains needed to slow down” because highly responsive chains were energy inefficient. Furthermore, once there were climate concerns, oil got a “dirty name”—as a polluting CO2 fuel—that became another important reason to squeeze oil out of supply chains.

As the title of this column suggests, things appear to be the same for a while in the turbulent oil/energy markets. The titles of my last four updates that follow tell most of the story of the recent past.

  • “Oil Update: Fracking challenged with cheaper oil” (2020).
  • “Oil Update: Still need fracking?” (2021).
  • “Oil update: Where’s the global energy plan?” (2022).
  • “Oil update: We need security plans from policymakers” (2023).

Over the past several decades, shale fracking in the United States played a major role in moving the oil markets away from the too-often political whims of OPEC and other major oil-exporting countries. Fracking, for a while, became a stabilizing factor in moving the market closer to a free market based largely on supply versus demand principles. While pricing did not grow as fast as expected, it was more volatile and reactionary to major economic crashes, wars, and the COVID-19 pandemic. These events caused either demand or supply to significantly change, and with that, oil pricing as well.

Relative to climate change initiatives, my understanding, until recently, was there was a tacit agreement that there was a global strategy to move away from fossil fuels, by first using natural gas as a bridge fuel to replace almost all coal, and then oil use. Eventually replacing natural gas with renewables and other non-polluting energy sources.

SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article.

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Frictionless Videocast: AI and Digital Supply Chains with SAP’s Darcy MacClaren
Listen as Darcy MacClaren, Chief Revenue Officer, SAP Digital Supply Chain, and Rosemary Coates, Executive Director of the Reshoring Institute,…
Listen in

About the Author

Larry Lapide, Research Affiliate
Larry Lapide's Bio Photo

Dr. Lapide is a lecturer at the University of Massachusetts’ Boston Campus and is an MIT Research Affiliate. He received the inaugural Lifetime Achievement in Business Forecasting & Planning Award from the Institute of Business Forecasting & Planning. Dr. Lapide can be reached at: [email protected].

View Lawrence's author profile.

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service