•   Exclusive

The Collaboration Journey: Are we there yet?

After 20 plus years of talking about collaboration, there is still a long way to go.

Subscriber: Log Out

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

This is an excerpt of the original article. It was written for the November 2016 edition of Supply Chain Management Review. The full article is available to current subscribers.

November 2016

Is supply chain management strategic or tactical? Are the best supply chains collaborative? Should the goal be an integrated supply chain or an integrative supply chain? The answers are a mixed bag, according to this month’s contributors.
Browse this issue archive.
Already a subscriber? Access full edition now.

Need Help?
Contact customer service
847-559-7581   More options
Not a subscriber? Start your magazine subscription.

Twenty years ago, Boston Consulting Group’s Harold Sirkin warned that competition is no longer “company vs. company but supply chain vs. supply chain,” inviting a new era of supply chain collaboration. Pundits soon referred to collaborative supply chain design as the “ultimate core capability” and the “enabler of winning business models.” Based on your own experience with the day-to-day tussles that occur in the typical supply chain, you may wonder: “What on earth were they thinking?” The answer: Industry watchers had witnessed the stunning success of Honda and Toyota and viewed collaboration as inevitable.

For instance, as Honda prepared to bring the 1998 Accord to market, Honda’s internal analysis revealed two key points:

THE GOOD NEWS. Honda designers had developed an outstanding, customer-pleasing car.

THE BAD NEWS. As designed, the Accord would be too pricey. Honda needed to cut costs by 25%.

Because 80% to 85% of the typical Honda is sourced from suppliers, Honda had only one option: Ask suppliers for help. And that’s exactly what Honda did. Working with suppliers, the automaker lowered the cost of the ‘98 Accord by almost 30%. The launch was a success. Many of the technological advances developed for the 1998 Accord appeared in the next iteration of the Civic, a model that became a huge cash cow for Honda. The bottom line: Honda and its suppliers had shown that supply chains that work together win together.

This complete article is available to subscribers only.
Click on Log In Now at the top of this article for full access.
Or, Start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.

SC
MR

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

From the November 2016 edition of Supply Chain Management Review.

November 2016

Is supply chain management strategic or tactical? Are the best supply chains collaborative? Should the goal be an integrated supply chain or an integrative supply chain? The answers are a mixed bag, according to this…
Browse this issue archive.
Access your online digital edition.
Download a PDF file of the November 2016 issue.

Download Article PDF

Twenty years ago, Boston Consulting Group's Harold Sirkin warned that competition is no longer “company vs. company but supply chain vs. supply chain,” inviting a new era of supply chain collaboration. Pundits soon referred to collaborative supply chain design as the “ultimate core capability” and the “enabler of winning business models.” Based on your own experience with the day-to-day tussles that occur in the typical supply chain, you may wonder: “What on earth were they thinking?” The answer: Industry watchers had witnessed the stunning success of Honda and Toyota and viewed collaboration as inevitable.

For instance, as Honda prepared to bring the 1998 Accord to market, Honda's internal analysis revealed two key points:

THE GOOD NEWS. Honda designers had developed an outstanding, customer-pleasing car.

THE BAD NEWS. As designed, the Accord would be too pricey. Honda needed to cut costs by 25%.

Because 80% to 85% of the typical Honda is sourced from suppliers, Honda had only one option: Ask suppliers for help. And that's exactly what Honda did. Working with suppliers, the automaker lowered the cost of the ‘98 Accord by almost 30%. The launch was a success. Many of the technological advances developed for the 1998 Accord appeared in the next iteration of the Civic, a model that became a huge cash cow for Honda. The bottom line: Honda and its suppliers had shown that supply chains that work together win together.

SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article.

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Talking Supply Chain: Doomsday never arrives for Baltimore bridge collapse impacts
The collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key bridge brought doomsday headlines for the supply chain. But the reality has been something less…
Listen in

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service