•   Exclusive

S&OP Made Good: The Importance of Investing in People

Many companies still struggle to get value out of their sales and operations planning processes. They invest heavily in technology and processes to reach for S&OP's cross-functional potential, but end up with discouraging results. For companies that truly understand the role of people in an effective S&OP process, it's a different story. Here's what it takes to get the people dimension right.

Subscriber: Log Out

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

This is an excerpt of the original article. It was written for the January-February 2016 edition of Supply Chain Management Review. The full article is available to current subscribers.

January-February 2016

It’s a new year. Most of us will have new budgets to meet and new expectations for the performance of our supply chains. Many will look to best practices from industry leaders to improve our operations. But, are best practices really the “best” way to go? As you think about 2016, I hope you ask the question: What better practices can I adopt for my supply chain?
Browse this issue archive.
Already a subscriber? Access full edition now.

Need Help?
Contact customer service
847-559-7581   More options
Not a subscriber? Start your magazine subscription.

Here’s an uncomfortable question: After 30 years of talking about sales and operations planning (S&OP), can we truly say it’s working?

S&OP is a terrific idea in principle. When it’s done right, it’s great in practice too. But the trouble is, it’s not often done right. Here’s how I know that.

Recently, my company, together with the trade organization Eye for Transport (EFT), surveyed 131 supply chain executives, mostly from large manufacturers, to explore their S&OP experiences. At first, the evidence was reassuring: 85 percent of respondents claimed to be following S&OP with discipline “somewhat to completely.” But answers to the follow-on questions weren’t so encouraging: Almost 40 percent said that they thought a monthly meeting was enough to qualify as S&OP, and a staggering 94 percent were making crucial supply chain decisions outside the process. (See Exhibit 1.) Not good.

This complete article is available to subscribers only.
Click on Log In Now at the top of this article for full access.
Or, Start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.

SC
MR

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

From the January-February 2016 edition of Supply Chain Management Review.

January-February 2016

It’s a new year. Most of us will have new budgets to meet and new expectations for the performance of our supply chains. Many will look to best practices from industry leaders to improve our operations. But, are…
Browse this issue archive.
Access your online digital edition.

Download Article PDF

Here's an uncomfortable question: After 30 years of talking about sales and operations planning (S&OP), can we truly say it's working?

S&OP is a terrific idea in principle. When it's done right, it's great in practice too. But the trouble is, it's not often done right. Here's how I know that.

Recently, my company, together with the trade organization Eye for Transport (EFT), surveyed 131 supply chain executives, mostly from large manufacturers, to explore their S&OP experiences. At first, the evidence was reassuring: 85 percent of respondents claimed to be following S&OP with discipline “somewhat to completely.” But answers to the follow-on questions weren't so encouraging: Almost 40 percent said that they thought a monthly meeting was enough to qualify as S&OP, and a staggering 94 percent were making crucial supply chain decisions outside the process. (See Exhibit 1.) Not good.

SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article.

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Talking Supply Chain: Doomsday never arrives for Baltimore bridge collapse impacts
The collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key bridge brought doomsday headlines for the supply chain. But the reality has been something less…
Listen in

About the Author

Sarah Petrie, Executive Managing Editor, Peerless Media
Sarah Petrie's Bio Photo

I am the executive managing editor of two business-to-business magazines. I run the day-to-day activities of the magazines and their Websites. I am responsible for schedules, editing, and production of those books. I also assist in the editing and copy editing responsibilities of a third magazine and handle the editing and production of custom publishing projects. Additionally, I have past experience in university-level teaching and marketing writing.

View Sarah's author profile.

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service