Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.
May-June 2021
Indulge me for a minute, while I lead a cheer for our profession. I wrote my column for the January 2021 issue of SCMR one Sunday morning after watching the first trucks full of vaccine roll out of a Pfizer plant in Michigan, headed for a UPS sortation depot. I felt an incredible sense of optimism for the country, and pride in the role that we, as supply chain managers, were going to play to combat a pandemic. Supply chain as in the spotlight, and on that morning, it was for all the right reasons. Fast forward to late April 2021. Browse this issue archive.Need Help? Contact customer service 847-559-7581 More options
A fundamental theory underlying the concept of supply chain resilience is that the most efficient supply chains are also the most fragile. Of course, when the global economy is humming, as it was for the past 10 years, and supply chain disruptions are region-specific and isolated, as was also the case for the past 10 years, that theory seems, well, theoretical. It was something for academics to discuss while supply chain managers designed supply chains that took advantage of the labor arbitrage, minimized the amount of inventory on hand, operated near capacity and relied on logistics networks for just-in-time delivery over long distances.
Then along came COVID-19. Suddenly, theory became practice and global supply chains came to a screeching halt. Companies operating just-in-time networks with minimal on-hand inventory proved to be the most fragile—shutting down first. Others that were already operating at near full capacity, such as the toilet paper industry, could not increase production to meet demand. Efficiency became a vulnerability rather than an asset.
In addition to supply problems, many of these companies grappled with rigidly worded contracts, with limited options. They were either required to take delivery of supply they didn’t want or couldn’t get supply they desperately needed. The contracts were incomplete. In this paper, we’ll demonstrate that when used in the right context, the adoption of incomplete contracts can actually help companies gain more flexibility and resilience.
This complete article is available to subscribers only.
Log in now for full access or start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.
SC
MR
Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.
May-June 2021
Indulge me for a minute, while I lead a cheer for our profession. I wrote my column for the January 2021 issue of SCMR one Sunday morning after watching the first trucks full of vaccine roll out of a Pfizer plant in… Browse this issue archive. Access your online digital edition. Download a PDF file of the May-June 2021 issue.A fundamental theory underlying the concept of supply chain resilience is that the most efficient supply chains are also the most fragile. Of course, when the global economy is humming, as it was for the past 10 years, and supply chain disruptions are region-specific and isolated, as was also the case for the past 10 years, that theory seems, well, theoretical. It was something for academics to discuss while supply chain managers designed supply chains that took advantage of the labor arbitrage, minimized the amount of inventory on hand, operated near capacity and relied on logistics networks for just-in-time delivery over long distances.
Then along came COVID-19. Suddenly, theory became practice and global supply chains came to a screeching halt. Companies operating just-in-time networks with minimal on-hand inventory proved to be the most fragile—shutting down first. Others that were already operating at near full capacity, such as the toilet paper industry, could not increase production to meet demand. Efficiency became a vulnerability rather than an asset.
In addition to supply problems, many of these companies grappled with rigidly worded contracts, with limited options. They were either required to take delivery of supply they didn’t want or couldn’t get supply they desperately needed. The contracts were incomplete. In this paper, we’ll demonstrate that when used in the right context, the adoption of incomplete contracts can actually help companies gain more flexibility and resilience.
SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article.
SC
MR
More Risk Management
- Supply chain’s rise in prominence brings regulatory compliance into focus
- Inflation continues to have a wide-ranging impact on supply chains
- A reshoring history lesson
- Planning fatigue may be settling in
- Inflation, economic worries among top supply chain concerns for SMBs
- Despite American political environment, global geopolitical risks may be easing
- More Risk Management
Latest Podcast
Explore
Topics
Procurement & Sourcing News
- ISM May Semiannual Report calls for growth in 2024, at a reduced rate
- Supply chain’s rise in prominence brings regulatory compliance into focus
- Inflation continues to have a wide-ranging impact on supply chains
- A reshoring history lesson
- Strategic cost savings differ from cutting costs
- Planning fatigue may be settling in
- More Procurement & Sourcing