Log In   |  Register Free Newsletter Subscription
Skip navigation
Zibb
Subscribe to Supply Chain Management Review

Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—I

June 16, 2009

A reputable source told me last week that a major U.S. corporation recently informed its procurement staff that the company will no longer pay for their professional membership in ISM. Is this another example of "penny wise and pound foolish" behavior? 

Let’s do the math on this decision. 

  • Annual dues for ISM vary by affiliate, but average about $200 per person per year
  • Assume the member attends 5 dinner meetings at $25 per event = $125 per person per year
  • Potential corporate cost savings per procurement employee per year = $325 

In terms of the total “investment” that a company makes in its human resources, $325 per person per year is a pittance. To put this in perspective: a new PC alone can run a few thousand dollars per employee every two to three years. 

What about the value of the ISM membership? Here is a partial list of benefits: information exchange, best practices sharing, dinner presentations by experts on key subjects (without having to fly to a conference), discounts on other services from ISM, etc. For a more complete listing of the benefits, see: 

 http://www.ism.ws/membership/content.cfm?ItemNumber=5605&navItemNumber=5466

Anybody who has been an active member of ISM can generally attest to the career- and skills-building value. 

Ok—so this particular St. Louis based corporation—if the report is correct—is actually demonstrating a view that their people are not really assets. On the contrary, they seem to view their employees more as costs. As a side note: this is a fairly common mistake among companies that ultimately develop serious health issues. See the book Beat the Odds: Avoid Corporate Death for an easy read on how companies kill themselves, and how your company can avoid that fate.

More on training accountability in my next post.

Posted by Robert A. Rudzki on June 16, 2009 | Comments (16)

October 10, 2009
In response to: Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—I
Edward Lane commented:

There's good info here. I did a search on the topic and found most people will agree with your blog. Keep up the good work mate!


October 8, 2009
In response to: Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—I
BloggerDude commented:

I don't know If I said it already but ...Hey good stuff...keep up the good work! :) I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say I'm glad I found your blog. Thanks,) A definite great read....


September 30, 2009
In response to: Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—I
Carl Vandors commented:

Hey very nice blog!!....I'm an instant fan, I have bookmarked you and I'll be checking back on a regular....See ya


September 30, 2009
In response to: Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—I
Online Stock Trading commented:

Hey very nice blog!!....I'm an instant fan, I have bookmarked you and I'll be checking back on a regular....See ya


September 30, 2009
In response to: Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—I
Online Stock Trading commented:

what a great site and informative posts, I will add a backlink and bookmark your site. Keep up the good work!


September 29, 2009
In response to: Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—I
Online Stock Trading commented:

There is obviously a lot to know about this. There are some good points here.


September 29, 2009
In response to: Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—I
Online Stock Trading commented:

Your site was extremely interesting, especially since I was searching for thoughts on this subject last Thursday.


October 22, 2009
In response to: Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—I
Online Stock Trading commented:

Super site….where’s the blog roll?


September 23, 2009
In response to: Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—I
Tony Brown commented:

I usually don’t post on Blogs but ya forced me to, great info.. excellent! … I'll add a backlink and bookmark your site.


September 10, 2009
In response to: Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—I
Bill Bartmann_ commented:

I'm so glad I found this site...Keep up the good work


September 9, 2009
In response to: Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—I
Bill Bartmann commented:

Excellent site, keep up the good work


September 6, 2009
In response to: Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—I
Work from home commented:

This site rocks!


September 6, 2009
In response to: Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—I
Work from home commented:

This site rocks!


September 5, 2009
In response to: Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—I
Bill Bartmann Scam commented:

Great site...keep up the good work.


June 18, 2009
In response to: Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—I
Ron Casbon commented:

Unfortunately, there are "active members of ISM" and there are those who are just members because their employer pays their membership dues. Those who are "active members" and participate in the wide variety of training opportunities available at little or no cost will confirm the value of ISM membership. Companies who support ISM membership and participation are usually on the upper end of the scale in terms of employee professional certification and the use of leading edge supply chain practices. Coincidence? I doubt it.


June 17, 2009
In response to: Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—I
There''s a Difference commented:

The thing to remember is that there is a difference between training and membership. Honestly, membership in ISM (and, yes, I've been a member and have had staff that were members) is not the best use of discretionary funds. You can get those same benefits (networking, magazine articles, etc.) for free in this day and age online. The quality is usually better, too. I agree that training is not a cost, but an investment. So I'd rather use my $200 per employee on training -- where I get value -- than a membership. If that St. Louis corporation cut training funds, shame on them. If they cut membership support, it's probably a good decision. Everyone has limited discretionary funds and many ways to spend them. You can't continue to spend money on something just because that's the way it's always been done.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Buyers Guide
Newsletters
This Week in Supply Chain
Supply Chain Executive Briefing
Logistics Preview
This Week in Logistics
Supply Chain & Logistics Tech Briefs



Please read our Privacy Policy

About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Author Guidelines   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscriptions   |   RSS
© 2010 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy