Recent Posts
- Strategic Sourcing Lessons
- GraphJam.com Hits the Charts
- Avoid These Classic Mistakes—IV
- Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—II
- Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—I
- Cost Reduction or Avoidance: The Health Care Dilemma
- Officials at GM Sell Their Shares
- Strategic Sourcing Success Factors: Speaking with One Voice—II
- Strategic Sourcing Success Factors: Speaking with One Voice - I
- Procurement and Strategic Sourcing Training – Part 2
Recent Comments
- MaryMonro on The Year in Review: Blog Topics
- AlexAxe on Procurement and Strategic Sourcing Training – Reinvigorate, Don’t Curtail!
- CocoChanels on The Year in Review: Blog Topics
- ordiseeme on Is Sears going to make it?
- onellChommora on The Year in Review: Blog Topics
Most Commented On
- The Year in Review: Blog Topics (20)
- Is Sears going to make it? (9)
- Payment Terms – IV (7)
- Procurement and Strategic Sourcing Training – Reinvigorate, Don’t Curtail! (7)
- Is Cerberus Going to Make It? (6)
Archives
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
Blog
Strategic Sourcing of Information Technology: Part 1 – What Sometimes Is
April 18, 2008
On occasion, I’ll be inviting knowledgeable experts to cover various topics relating to their subject matter expertise. Today’s guest blogger is James Baehr, who heads up the IT Strategic Sourcing practice at Greybeard Advisors LLC. Jim has had management roles in IT sales, IT operations, and IT procurement at major firms, before joining Greybeard. Jim can be reached at: Baehr@GreybeardAdvisors.com
Consider the possibilities – cost containment, standardization, supplier rationalization, risk management, and relationship management. These are just a few of the benefits realized by using genuine strategic sourcing to acquire Information Technology (IT) goods and services. With the commoditization of many technology products and services, it’s realistic to expect synergies between the IT and procurement disciplines. However, in many companies there is still no direct connection between the two, even in some big companies.
Understanding how Information Technology has evolved gives insight as to why many in IT management still want to control these usually significant purchases. As recently as a decade ago, when the value of strategic sourcing was becoming increasing evident, it was all about span of control. This old school attitude looked on strategic procurement as:
- Slowing down the process
- Too bureaucratic
- An unnecessary change – “We’ve done it this way for years”
- Ineffective – “We can get a better deal”
Many IT purchases tend to be reactionary. A need is identified. A product or service is selected. A deal is negotiated. Sometimes a letter of intent or an agreement is signed. After all this is done, a call is made to Purchasing to prepare a purchase order. Too often Finance and Legal are also not engaged, leaving all three groups to either play catch up, or worse, to have no say in the acquisition.
There is no good reason why any major purchase of IT goods or services should be a spot buy. When this happens, it’s curious how a critical business unit can forsake some of its core disciplines like project management, change management and risk management. At its essence, true strategic sourcing incorporates all of these disciplines.
This Part 1 has pointed out some of the downsides of bad practices which unfortunately still exist. The next installment will describe just how effective a strategic sourcing partnership between IT and procurement can be.
Posted by Robert A. Rudzki on April 18, 2008 | Comments (0)





















