Recent Posts
- Strategic Sourcing Lessons
- GraphJam.com Hits the Charts
- Avoid These Classic Mistakes—IV
- Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—II
- Procurement Training—Who is Responsible?—I
- Cost Reduction or Avoidance: The Health Care Dilemma
- Officials at GM Sell Their Shares
- Strategic Sourcing Success Factors: Speaking with One Voice—II
- Strategic Sourcing Success Factors: Speaking with One Voice - I
- Procurement and Strategic Sourcing Training – Part 2
Recent Comments
- MaryMonro on The Year in Review: Blog Topics
- AlexAxe on Procurement and Strategic Sourcing Training – Reinvigorate, Don’t Curtail!
- CocoChanels on The Year in Review: Blog Topics
- ordiseeme on Is Sears going to make it?
- onellChommora on The Year in Review: Blog Topics
Most Commented On
- The Year in Review: Blog Topics (20)
- Is Sears going to make it? (9)
- Payment Terms – IV (7)
- Procurement and Strategic Sourcing Training – Reinvigorate, Don’t Curtail! (7)
- Is Cerberus Going to Make It? (6)
Archives
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
Blog
How Do You Show Value? VII
October 9, 2008
You can use your tracking system to create interest and build momentum for your results. Following is just one method to do that.
In Part IV of this series, I described the concepts of “Identified,” “On the Table,” “Negotiated,” and “Realized” results. You can think of these milestones are directly related to different phases of true strategic sourcing. “Identified” results are the outcome of doing the homework on a sourcing category – they represent the potential cost reductions possible for all efforts currently underway.
“On the Table” results reflect the current status of RFP efforts that are unfinished. You can think of this as work-in-progress.
“Negotiated” results are the annualized results from completed negotiations.
“Realized” results reflect the implemented results flowing to the bottom line.
The FIGURE shows one approach to displaying that information in a format suitable for senior management.
Posted by Robert A. Rudzki on October 9, 2008 | Comments (4)
Reader Comments
at 4/14/2009 6:17:10 AM, Ijjyewcm commented:
Best Site good looking
at 6/9/2009 4:22:29 PM, nogood87 commented:
It's serious
at 6/14/2009 4:00:24 AM, Mxaxkwow commented:
Hello good day
at 6/15/2009 5:37:28 PM, Qugzqgco commented:
This site is crazy :)





















