Recent Posts
- The Mark of a Leader – Part II
- The Mark of a Leader – Part I
- Business Success = A Team plus B Team
- Another Casualty – Part II
- Another Casualty – Part I
- To Act, or Not to Act
- Corporate eHarmony
- Transformation Insights - II
- Suppliers Pay for Access to Executives
- Killer CEOs
Recent Comments
- Robert Rudzki on Payment Terms – IV
- Andy on Payment Terms – IV
- G-Man on Empirical Evidence
- RK on ChangeThis Manifesto
- Robert Rudzki on Payment Terms – IV
Most Commented On
- Is Sears going to make it? (6)
- Payment Terms – IV (4)
- Leadership versus Management - II (3)
- Quotable Quotes – I (3)
- Supply Chain Components of Natural Gas Cost – II (2)
Archives
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
Blog
Payment Terms – IV
August 11, 2008
Do you have an easy reference document for comparing payment terms options? If not, here is a sample that you can build from.
|
Payment Terms |
|
Disc % |
# Days Due |
Interest Rate |
|
Benefit per $100 of Invoice (See Note *) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net 10 days |
|
0.0% |
10 |
7.0% |
|
$ 0.194 |
|
Net 15 days |
|
0.0% |
15 |
7.0% |
|
0.292 |
|
Net 20 days |
|
0.0% |
20 |
7.0% |
|
0.389 |
|
Net 30 days |
|
0.0% |
30 |
7.0% |
|
0.583 |
|
Net 45 days |
|
0.0% |
45 |
7.0% |
|
0.875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.75% 10 Days |
|
0.75% |
10 |
7.0% |
|
0.944 |
|
0.75% 15 Days |
|
0.75% |
15 |
7.0% |
|
1.042 |
|
0.75% 30 Days |
|
0.75% |
30 |
7.0% |
|
1.333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0% 10 Days |
|
1.0% |
10 |
7.0% |
|
1.194 |
|
1.0% 15 Days |
|
1.0% |
15 |
7.0% |
|
1.292 |
|
1.0% 20 Days |
|
1.0% |
20 |
7.0% |
|
1.389 |
|
1.0% 30 Days |
|
1.0% |
30 |
7.0% |
|
1.583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.25% 10 Days |
|
1.25% |
10 |
7.0% |
|
1.444 |
|
1.25% 15 Days |
|
1.25% |
15 |
7.0% |
|
1.542 |
|
1.25% 20 Days |
|
1.25% |
20 |
7.0% |
|
1.639 |
|
1.25% 30 Days |
|
1.25% |
30 |
7.0% |
|
1.833 |
|
Etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE:
* Calculations reflect the value per $100 of invoice, compared to paying immediately (on the invoice date). Calculations are based on the following formula:
Value of Net Days = [ (no. of days)/365 ] x $100 x interest rate
Example: Net 30 days value = [ (30/365)] x $100 x .07= $ .583
Value of Discount Terms = Value of Days + Value of Discount
Example: 1% Net 15 Value = $ .292 + $ 1.00 = $ 1.292
Here is an EXAMPLE in use:
Supplier currently offers Net 30 day terms (worth $0.583 per $ 100 of invoices).
Supplier proposes Net 45, 1% 15 terms:
Net 45 is worth $0.875 per $ 100 of invoices
1% 15 is worth $1.292 per $ 100 of invoices
Assessment: Both elements of the new terms (net, discount) are more attractive than the old terms. The discount option would be the preferred option in this situation.
More on the subject of payment terms in my next posting.
Posted by Robert A. Rudzki on August 11, 2008 | Comments (4)
In response to: Payment Terms – IV
Charles Dominick, SPSM commented:
Nice post, Robert. One thing that I think would be helpful to your readers is to indicate how you've determined the interest rate to use. Also, when your procurement teams have reported savings from payment terms, what type of education did you have to provide to senior management on this matter and did you ever have challenges getting management to buy in to the legitimacy of those savings?
In response to: Payment Terms – IV
Robert Rudzki commented:
Good question about the interest rate. In general, you should check with your company's Finance department and get their advice. They'll often have a clear view on the appropriate rate to use for this purpose. Getting senior management's buy-in to the idea that improving payment terms offers value is usually not a big challenge. If needed, you can walk them through an example, or show them the chart from the Payment Terms - III posting, to get the point across. Partnering with the Finance dept on payment terms is also a good idea - they are natural partners on this topic, and can help verify the procurement department's "value" calculations.
In response to: Payment Terms – IV
Andy commented:
I am struggling with this being a one-time benefit or an ongoing benefit. For example, If the invoice date is Jan 1, Feb 1, Mar 1, etc, then your payment with Net 10 would be Jan 10, Feb 10, Mar 10, etc. and with net 30 it would be Jan 30, Feb 30 (for example), Mar 30, etc. In either case you are paying every 30 days so wouldn't the benefit of net 30 only be a one-time benefit in month 1? Thanks.
In response to: Payment Terms – IV
Robert Rudzki commented:
Good question. In short, it depends on which benefit calculation you are focused on, and the baseline for comparison. If you are focused on the improvement in cash balances (from paying later), that is a one-time benefit. Some companies prefer to look at the "interest earnings" value of the one-time cash improvement. By its very nature, that is a recurring benefit, as long as you continue doing business with that supplier, and as long as there are in fact interest earnings on the "extra" cash you have on hand (as we have seen recently, short term interest rates can change dramatically on short notice). That's one reason why the table in the post is based on each $100 of invoices. The baseline is important as well. After a payment terms program matures, there may be little "year-over-year" change. And, most internal reporting tends to focus on the change compared to prior periods. Hope this helps.






