Recent Posts
- ISM Conference in St. Louis - II
- ISM Conference in St. Louis - I
- The ROI of Supplier Recognition
- ISM Conference in St. Louis
- SRM and Supplier Recognition - V
- SRM and Supplier Recognition - IV
- Strategic Sourcing of Information Technology: Part 2 – What Can Be
- Strategic Sourcing of Information Technology: Part 1 – What Sometimes Is
- SRM and Supplier Recognition - III
- SRM and Supplier Recognition - II
Recent Comments
- wow gold on Welcome to Transformation Leadership - Part 1
- Anthony on SRM and Supplier Recognition - III
- Dave Snyder, Federal Rack on Supplier Chain Disintermediation
- Paul Gooch, The Logical Group on Supplier Chain Disintermediation
- Robert Rudzki on Supplier Risk Management - IV
Most Commented On
- The Organization Chart Diversion – Part 4 (3)
- Supplier Chain Disintermediation (2)
- Supplier Risk Management - IV (2)
- The Organization Chart Diversion – Part 3 (2)
- Welcome to Transformation Leadership - Part 1 (2)
Archives
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
Blog
Negotiations Management – I
March 28, 2008
Last year, I had the opportunity to speak at the ISM annual conference in Las Vegas. The topic was World-Class Negotiations Management: Best Practices, Tools and Future Directions.
Those of you who speak publicly know the drill. You try to arrive at the assigned presentation room well in advance, to check the layout, and make sure all equipment is in place and functioning. The first thing I noticed about my assigned location was the room size: it was a large room and had seating for approximately 500 persons. That was of immediate concern. Presenters tend to prefer a small, filled-up room rather than a large, half-empty room. I was concerned that someone at ISM had goofed, and mistakenly assumed this topic would be a big draw.
As it turned out, my concern was premature. Just prior to the official start time, the room was full, indicating the interest that this topic generates among supply management professionals.
One of the reasons that I offered to speak on this topic was my perception that too many companies still practice “conventional” or “tactical” negotiations. We could spend a lot of space describing the distinction, but I find that one chart (see Figure below), can nicely summarize some of the key differences between “old school” and “new paradigm” negotiations.

Is your current practice best described by the left column, or the right column? If the former, then you are leaving a lot of value behind.
More on this topic in my next posting.
Note: the Figure is © Copyright Greybeard Advisors LLC All Rights Reserved
Posted by Robert A. Rudzki on March 28, 2008 | Comments (0)






