•   Exclusive

The Trade-offs of Outsourcing Procurement

Before you decide to outsource routine procurement activities, consider what your organization values most.

Subscriber: Log Out

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

This is an excerpt of the original article. It was written for the December 2015 edition of Supply Chain Management Review. The full article is available to current subscribers.

December 2015

It’s December, and time once again for our annual Executive Guide to Supply Chain Resources. This is a comprehensive guide to services, products, and educational opportunities targeted specifically to supply chain professionals. The editors at Supply Chain Management Review wish all of our readers a successful year to come.
Browse this issue archive.
Already a subscriber? Access full edition now.

Need Help?
Contact customer service
847-559-7581   More options
Not a subscriber? Start your magazine subscription.

To streamline their operations, many organizations are looking to outsource activities that do not need to be handled in-house. The procurement function can be a focus of outsourcing efforts if the organization determines that certain routine activities fall into this category. The types of activities can vary by organization, but in general they include tasks such as developing and executing simple contracts that involve little negotiation and are not integral to the organization’s overall business strategy. For many organizations, outsourcing presents a win-win—the organization frees up employees to focus on more strategic duties while maintaining some control over its procurement activities.

APQC’s Open Standards Benchmarking data in procurement indicates that just under 30 percent of responding organizations have initiated the outsourcing of non-strategic activities in their procurement functions (Exhibit 1). Twelve percent of responding organizations plan to invest in such programs within the next two years, meaning that 40 percent of organizations in APQC’s data find the idea of outsourcing more routine activities appealing for their procurement functions.

As part of its research, APQC compared the procurement performance of organizations that currently outsource non-strategic procurement activities against the performance of organizations that do not currently outsource. The results indicate that organizations outsourcing more routine procurement activities adopt more mature procurement practices than organizations that do not outsource. However, these organizations also have slightly higher costs associated with overall procurement processes, as well as with activities specifically related to ordering materials and services.

This complete article is available to subscribers only.
Click on Log In Now at the top of this article for full access.
Or, Start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.

SC
MR

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

From the December 2015 edition of Supply Chain Management Review.

December 2015

It’s December, and time once again for our annual Executive Guide to Supply Chain Resources. This is a comprehensive guide to services, products, and educational opportunities targeted specifically to supply chain…
Browse this issue archive.
Access your online digital edition.
Download a PDF file of the December 2015 issue.

Download Article PDF

To streamline their operations, many organizations are looking to outsource activities that do not need to be handled in-house. The procurement function can be a focus of outsourcing efforts if the organization determines that certain routine activities fall into this category. The types of activities can vary by organization, but in general they include tasks such as developing and executing simple contracts that involve little negotiation and are not integral to the organization's overall business strategy. For many organizations, outsourcing presents a win-win—the organization frees up employees to focus on more strategic duties while maintaining some control over its procurement activities.

APQC's Open Standards Benchmarking data in procurement indicates that just under 30 percent of responding organizations have initiated the outsourcing of non-strategic activities in their procurement functions (Exhibit 1). Twelve percent of responding organizations plan to invest in such programs within the next two years, meaning that 40 percent of organizations in APQC's data find the idea of outsourcing more routine activities appealing for their procurement functions.

As part of its research, APQC compared the procurement performance of organizations that currently outsource non-strategic procurement activities against the performance of organizations that do not currently outsource. The results indicate that organizations outsourcing more routine procurement activities adopt more mature procurement practices than organizations that do not outsource. However, these organizations also have slightly higher costs associated with overall procurement processes, as well as with activities specifically related to ordering materials and services.

SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article.

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Talking Supply Chain: Understanding the FTC’s ban on noncompetes
Crowell & Moring law partner Stefan Meisner joined the Talking Supply Chain podcast to discuss the recent decision by the Federal Trade…
Listen in

About the Author

Sarah Petrie, Executive Managing Editor, Peerless Media
Sarah Petrie's Bio Photo

I am the executive managing editor of two business-to-business magazines. I run the day-to-day activities of the magazines and their Websites. I am responsible for schedules, editing, and production of those books. I also assist in the editing and copy editing responsibilities of a third magazine and handle the editing and production of custom publishing projects. Additionally, I have past experience in university-level teaching and marketing writing.

View Sarah's author profile.

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service