•   Exclusive

The Rise of the Supply Chain Advocate

In a complex supply chain, every player has its own agenda. It takes a Supply Chain Advocate with an independent, holistic view of the supply chain to find win-win solutions that reduce costs and improve efficiency.

Subscriber: Log Out

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

This is an excerpt of the original article. It was written for the September-October 2015 edition of Supply Chain Management Review. The full article is available to current subscribers.

September-October 2015

It’s September, which means the kids are going back to school, and soon, you’ll spend the evenings helping them with their lessons. September is also the month that we publish Gartner’s annual look at the Top 25 supply chains. While the Top 25 is a celebration of great supply chains, the leaders also offer lessons for the rest of us who aspire to the top. It’s news you can use right now in your planning. And, we’ll have you home for dinner on Tuesday. We hope you’ll join us for this inaugural event.
Browse this issue archive.
Already a subscriber? Access full edition now.

Need Help?
Contact customer service
847-559-7581   More options
Not a subscriber? Start your magazine subscription.

In an ideal world, every trading partner in a supply chain pulls together to achieve the best balance between cost and service. Supply chains synchronized in this way are efficient, agile, and able to respond quickly to shifts in the market.

In the real world, such a high level of collaboration is difficult to achieve. Rather than perform together like a well-tuned orchestra, multiple trading partners often play their own tunes. They are more likely to pull in different tactical and strategic directions, impairing end-to-end visibility and coordination. The resulting lack of alignment and supply chain visibility creates costly inefficiencies and slows responses to the market.

Bringing these entities into line requires changes in behavior that comply with the supply chain’s overarching performance objectives. To get buy in, these changes must be orchestrated in a way that benefits each party in the value chain—otherwise there is little incentive to participate in the change management exercise.

This complete article is available to subscribers only.
Click on Log In Now at the top of this article for full access.
Or, Start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.

SC
MR

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

From the September-October 2015 edition of Supply Chain Management Review.

September-October 2015

It’s September, which means the kids are going back to school, and soon, you’ll spend the evenings helping them with their lessons. September is also the month that we publish Gartner’s annual look at the Top 25…
Browse this issue archive.
Access your online digital edition.
Download a PDF file of the September-October 2015 issue.

Download Article PDF

In an ideal world, every trading partner in a supply chain pulls together to achieve the best balance between cost and service. Supply chains synchronized in this way are efficient, agile, and able to respond quickly to shifts in the market.

In the real world, such a high level of collaboration is difficult to achieve. Rather than perform together like a well-tuned orchestra, multiple trading partners often play their own tunes. They are more likely to pull in different tactical and strategic directions, impairing end-to-end visibility and coordination. The resulting lack of alignment and supply chain visibility creates costly inefficiencies and slows responses to the market.

Bringing these entities into line requires changes in behavior that comply with the supply chain's overarching performance objectives. To get buy in, these changes must be orchestrated in a way that benefits each party in the value chain—otherwise there is little incentive to participate in the change management exercise.

SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article.

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Talking Supply Chain: Doomsday never arrives for Baltimore bridge collapse impacts
The collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key bridge brought doomsday headlines for the supply chain. But the reality has been something less…
Listen in

About the Author

Sarah Petrie, Executive Managing Editor, Peerless Media
Sarah Petrie's Bio Photo

I am the executive managing editor of two business-to-business magazines. I run the day-to-day activities of the magazines and their Websites. I am responsible for schedules, editing, and production of those books. I also assist in the editing and copy editing responsibilities of a third magazine and handle the editing and production of custom publishing projects. Additionally, I have past experience in university-level teaching and marketing writing.

View Sarah's author profile.

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service