•   Exclusive

The Benefits of Early Involvement in Capital Expenditures

Procurement and supply management personnel are becoming involved in more and more areas of company spend. But one category that to date has largely eluded them is capital expenditure projects. That’s unfortunate because when procurement gets involved early in these capital projects, the advantages—operational, technical, financial, and more—can be profound.

Subscriber: Log Out

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

This is an excerpt of the original article. It was written for the May-June 2011 edition of Supply Chain Management Review. The full article is available to current subscribers.

May-June 2011

People, process, technology. These are the three core elements that determine the relative success (or failure) of any organization. We’ve heard this in countless management books and keynotes speeches. And it’s hammered home in business school curricula across the country. Now it’s our turn. This issue of Supply Chain Management Review is devoted in roughly equal measures to the three core elements. Our rational: Their importance can never be stated enough.
Browse this issue archive.
Already a subscriber? Access full edition now.

Need Help?
Contact customer service
847-559-7581   More options
Not a subscriber? Start your magazine subscription.

A look toward the future suggests that supply personnel will be involved with just about every category of purchase expenditure. While managing direct materials has been the historic responsibility of procurement, why not also manage those troublesome indirect items? And, while we are at it, let’s have procurement personnel apply their commercial expertise to the many services required to operate a business. But why stop there? Why not apply that procurement magic to capital expenditures? After all, capital projects require suppliers and financial resources. They practically beg for procurement involvement.

This article explores procurement involvement within capital expenditure projects. As the term is used throughout this article, involvement refers to an earlier rather than later point in the capital expenditure process. Research shows that on average the benefits of involvement are greatest when that involvement comes earlier in a project, such as during the concept or feasibility planning stages, rather than later.

Let’s step back and talk about the concept of early procurement involvement. Early involvement is the process of relying on procurement personnel and resources, either physically or virtually, to provide support during functional and strategic planning, demand and supply planning, continuous improvement projects, capital project planning, and when developing new products and technologies. Involvement can take place formally, such as by membership on a project team, or informally through a consultative role, or even virtually.

The scope of procurement’s early involvement must expand once supply groups evolve from a transactional-based purchasing model to a strategic supply model. While a seat at every table sounds good on paper, turning this into a reality is a bit more challenging. It requires human resources that are available to support other groups as well as personnel who have a solid knowledge of the needs of various functional groups.

This complete article is available to subscribers only.
Click on Log In Now at the top of this article for full access.
Or, Start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.

Not ready to subscribe, but need this article?
Buy the complete article now. Only $20.00. Instant PDF Download
.
Access the complete issue of Supply Chain Management Review magazine featuring
this article including every word, chart and table exactly as it appeared in the magazine.

SC
MR

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

From the May-June 2011 edition of Supply Chain Management Review.

May-June 2011

People, process, technology. These are the three core elements that determine the relative success (or failure) of any organization. We’ve heard this in countless management books and keynotes speeches. And it’s…
Browse this issue archive.
Download a PDF file of the May-June 2011 issue.

Download Article PDF

A look toward the future suggests that supply personnel will be involved with just about every category of purchase expenditure. While managing direct materials has been the historic responsibility of procurement, why not also manage those troublesome indirect items? And, while we are at it, let’s have procurement personnel apply their commercial expertise to the many services required to operate a business. But why stop there? Why not apply that procurement magic to capital expenditures? After all, capital projects require suppliers and financial resources. They practically beg for procurement involvement.

This article explores procurement involvement within capital expenditure projects. As the term is used throughout this article, involvement refers to an earlier rather than later point in the capital expenditure process. Research shows that on average the benefits of involvement are greatest when that involvement comes earlier in a project, such as during the concept or feasibility planning stages, rather than later.

Let’s step back and talk about the concept of early procurement involvement. Early involvement is the process of relying on procurement personnel and resources, either physically or virtually, to provide support during functional and strategic planning, demand and supply planning, continuous improvement projects, capital project planning, and when developing new products and technologies. Involvement can take place formally, such as by membership on a project team, or informally through a consultative role, or even virtually.

The scope of procurement’s early involvement must expand once supply groups evolve from a transactional-based purchasing model to a strategic supply model. While a seat at every table sounds good on paper, turning this into a reality is a bit more challenging. It requires human resources that are available to support other groups as well as personnel who have a solid knowledge of the needs of various functional groups.

SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article.

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Talking Supply Chain: Doomsday never arrives for Baltimore bridge collapse impacts
The collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key bridge brought doomsday headlines for the supply chain. But the reality has been something less…
Listen in

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service