Login



For PLUS+ subscription assistance, contact customer service.

Not a PLUS+ Subscriber?

Become a PLUS+ Subscriber today and you'll get access to all Supply Chain Management Review premium content including:

  • Full Web Access
  • 7 Magazine Issues per Year
  • Companion Digital Editions
  • Digital Edition Archives
  • Bonus Email Newsletters

Subscribe Today!

Premium access to exclusive online content, companion digital editions, magazine issues and email newsletters.

Subscribe Now.


Become a PLUS+ subscriber and you'll get access to all Supply Chain Management Review premium content including:

  • Full Web Access. All feature articles, bonus reports and industry research through scmr.com.

  • 7 Magazine Issues per year of Supply Chain Management Review magazine.

  • Companion Digital Editions. Searchable replicas of each magazine issue. Read them in any web browser. Delivered by email faster than printed issues.

  • Digital Editions Archives. Every article, every chart and every table as it appeared in the magazine for all archive issues back to 2009.

  • Bonus email newsletters. Add convenient weekly and monthly email newsletters to your subscription to keep your finger on the pulse of the industry.

PLUS+ subscriptions start as low as $109/year*. Begin yours now.
That's less than $0.36 per day for access to information that you can use year-round to better manage your entire global supply chain.

For assistance with your PLUS+ subscription, contact customer service.

* Prices higher for subscriptions outside the USA.

PLUS+ Customer Service Support


Customer service for all PLUS+ subscribers is available Mon-Fri, 9am-5pm Eastern time.

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 1-800-598-6067 (1-508-663-1500 x294 outside USA)
Mail: PO Box 1496, Framingham MA 01701-1496, USA



You have been logged out of PLUS+


For PLUS+ subscription assistance, contact customer service.

Need to access our premium PLUS+ Content?
Upgrade your subscription now.


Our records show that you are currently receiving a free subscription to Supply Chain Management Review magazine, or your subscription has expired. To access our premium content, you need to upgrade your subscription to our PLUS+ status.

To upgrade your subscription account, please contact customer service at:

Email: [email protected] Phone: 1-800-598-6067 (1-508-663-1500 x294 outside USA)

Become a PLUS+ subscriber and you'll get access to all Supply Chain Management Review premium content including:

  • Full Web Access. All feature articles, bonus reports and industry research through scmr.com.

  • 7 Magazine Issues per year of Supply Chain Management Review magazine.

  • Companion Digital Editions. Searchable replicas of each magazine issue. Read them in any web browser. Delivered by email faster than printed issues.

  • Digital Editions Archives. Every article, every chart and every table as it appeared in the magazine for all archive issues back to 2010.

  • Bonus email newsletters. Add convenient weekly and monthly email newsletters to your subscription to keep your finger on the pulse of the industry.

PLUS+ subscriptions start as low as $129/year*. Start yours now.
That's less than $0.36 per day for access to information that you can use year-round to better manage your entire global supply chain.

This content is available for PLUS+ subscribers.


Already a PLUS+ subscriber?


To begin or upgrade your subscription, Become a PLUS+ subscriber now.

For assistance with your PLUS+ subscription, contact customer service.

Sorry, but your login to PLUS+ has failed.


Please recheck your login information and resubmit below.



For PLUS+ subscription assistance, contact customer service.

Supply Chain Managers Hoping to See Rebound in Global Ocean Cargo Container Sector

The continued rise in fuel prices and chartering rates had a negative impact on the earnings of the top tier carriers for most of 2018. But as new alliances mature, industry experts are forecasting a modest improvement by next year.

By ·
By ·

Signs of a turnaround in the prospects of global container shipping companies began surfacing last July when rates began creeping up through the Peak Season. Overcapacity, however, continues to haunt the industry and may keep it from a sustainable recovery.

Maritime analysts at Xeneta, a global benchmarking and market intelligence platform based in Oslo, Norway, note that carriers operating in the trans-Pacific have been able to make their general rate increases (GRIs) stick through early autumn. However, this word of caution comes from Xeneta CEO Patrik Berglund: “Although carriers managed to increase rates by around 7.7% last August, the method remains mostly inefficient. If the full increase were applied, rates would have jumped by more than 20%.”

Shanghai Containerized Freight Index (SCFI),a weekly index based on estimated freight rates on 15 routes out of Shanghai to different parts of the world. SCFI analysts observe some carriers will manage to become profitable by keeping “spot freight rates” elevated by year’s end.

They also note some evidence that carriers may reduce supply after the peak season by withdrawing capacity. This particular kind of discipline was not enforced in 2017, however. As a consequence, shippers witnessed a collapse in rates and a weak platform for carriers for the renegotiation of annual contracts.

Lars Jensen, CEO and partner at SeaIntel Maritime Analysis in Copenhagen, says that changes in the liner shipping sector do not take place overnight, and hence “disruption” would be the wrong term to associate with the industry.

“But make no mistake, the industry is in the midst of a fundamental transformation that will make an impact on all stakeholders markedly in the coming years, and one that could remove quite a number of players from the battle field,” says Jensen. “This is why we are, right now, witnessing a reduction in weekly coverage on the main trades. And as we see scores of additional mega-vessels about to be delivered, we will continue to see a reduction in weekly service coverage.”

Zvi Schreiber, CEO of Freightos, an online freight marketplace founded in Tel Aviv, says carriers may be hurting themselves by employing this strategy, especially if carriers try to “signal” rate information to keep them artificially high. “Global freight pricing has been historically opaque, creating an inefficient market that hinders decision-making and wastes money,” he says.

While it appears that the market is supporting far more robust rates, Schreiber is circumspect when examining this trend. “Current rates reflect a combination of emergency bunker surcharges and shipment surges to beat new import regulations,” he says. “But given ongoing overcapacity, we may see peak season prices reach their apex by this fall, much like 2017.”

Datamyne Top 25 Carriers in Waterbourne Imports January - July 2018

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
RankCarriersTEUs% of totalTEUs July 2018% of totalTEUs July 2017% change
1MSC-MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY S A - MEDU (MSCU)1            259,896 12.31            237,684 12.0522,2129.35
2OCEAN NETWORK EXPRESS PTE LTD (ONEY) (MOLU) (NYKS) (KKLU)2            245,579 11.63            90,609 4.59154,970
3MAERSK LINE (MAEU) (SAFM)3            209,135 9.90            172,239 8.7336,89621.42
4EVERGREEN LINE (EGLV)            175,765 8.32            159,300 8.0716,46510.34
5HAPAG LLOYD A G (HLCU) (HLUS)4            174,956 8.29            135,231 6.8539,72529.38
6CMA-CGM (CMDU) (ANLC)5            157,809 7.47            142,451 7.2215,35810.78
7CHINA OCEAN SHIPPING COMPANY (COSU)            146,553 6.94            154,119 7.81-7,566-4.91
8ORIENT OVERSEAS CONTAINER LINE LTD (OOLU)            114,573 5.43            108,477 5.506,0965.62
9APL CO PTE LTD-NOL GROUP (APLU)            114,097 5.40            108,907 5.525,1904.77
10YANG MING MARINE TRANSPORT CORP (YMLU)            91,770 4.35            79,684 4.0412,08615.17
11HYUNDAI MERCHANT MARINE (HDMU)            83,062 3.93            80,433 4.082,6293.27
12ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERVICES LTD (ZIMU)            61,156 2.90            53,631 2.727,525
13HAMBURG SUED (SUDU) (ANRM)6            53,634 2.54            43,727 2.229,90722.66
14PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL LINES (PTE) LTD (PABV)            28,845 1.37            22,946 1.165,89925.71
15TRANSFRUT EXPRESS LIMITED (TFXL)            22,092 1.05            20,660 1.051,4326.93
16SM LINE CORPORATION (SMLM)            21,734 1.03            27,601 1.40-5,867-21.26
17SEABOARD MARINE LTD (SMLU)            21,287 1.01            19,060 0.972,22711.68
18WAN HAI LINES LTD (WHLC)            18,383 0.87            15,876 0.802,50715.79
19SEALAND (SEAU)            14,797 0.70            11,489 0.583,30828.79
20GREAT WHITE FLEET LTD (GWFL) (GWFT)7            13,720 0.65            13,350 0.683702.77
21CROWLEY LATIN AMERICA SERVICES LLC (CLAM) (CWLQ) (CAMN)8            12,477 0.59            12,237 0.622401.96
22MATSON NAVIGATION CO (MATS)</td>               11,103 0.53            11,429 0.58-326-2.85
23INDEPENDENT CONTAINER LINE LTD (IILU)              8,924 0.42              7,480 0.381,44419.30
24ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINE AB (ACLU)              8,741 0.41              8,496 0.432452.88
25NETWORK SHIPPING LTD (A LIBERIAN COMPANY) (NQSH)              8,398 0.40            10,516 0.53-2,118-20.14

Staying on top

Alphaliner’s Top 100 ocean carriers reflects the disruption caused by recent alliances, mergers and acquisitions over the past two years which has reduced the number of lines claiming global market share by half.

Analysts for the Paris-based consultancy have so far identified the top tier players as being fairly stable, but one need only consider the poor performance on 10th-ranked Zim this year to realize carriers continue to struggle.

“The second quarter of 2018 was characterized by the continued rise in fuel prices and chartering rates, as well as low freight rates, all with a negative impact on the results of carriers,” says Eli Glickman, president and CEO of ZIM. In a letter to shareholders, he says ZIM’s recent announcement of long-term strategic cooperation with the 2M Alliance in the Pacific-USEC trade is evidence of the company’s strength, however.

“This agreement is expected to bring considerable efficiencies and savings, along with a far improved service portfolio, supporting ZIM’s strategy going forward,” says Glickman, adding that the agreement is expected to yield better operating efficiencies, reinforce pricing discipline, and keep shippers and cargo owners from engaging in such price-destructive behavior as double-booking their cargo on different sailings without any financial consequences.

Meanwhile, Zim is struggling to keep company with the leaders of the Alphaliner pack comprising Maersk; MSC; COSCO Group; CMA CGM; Hapag-Lloyd; ONE (Ocean Network Express); Evergreen Line; Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp.; and perennial long shot, PIL (Pacific Int. Line).

Analysts for Descartes Datamyne may be well ahead of the curve when it comes to assessing the strengths of carriers in their Darwinian battle for market share. By recognizing that the pace of consolidation has already altered the way brands are perceived, and twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) are counted. [see chart].

The one outstanding example of this trend is the ranking of ONE as a single entity rather than breaking out the former Japanese partners as independent carriers.
“The amalgamation of K Line, MOL, and NYK container divisions, now operating under a single banner was a game changer,” says Brendan McCahill, senior vice president of Global Trade Data at Descartes Datamyne. “We also have to bear in mind that OOCL is now owned by COSCO, which also had an increase of ten percent in TEUs.”

What next?

Given the challenges that all but the top five players have from a cost competitiveness perspective, analysts feel that it’s reasonable to assume that there will be some further consolidation. This is in spite of how the sector has distilled into the relatively small number of significant independent carriers today.

“Certainly, it’s not out of the question that the make-up of some of the alliances could see some changes over time,” says Ron Widdows, the current chairman of the World Shipping Council. “But given what has taken place in the last couple years, perhaps things will settle a bit before any further changes take place.”

Meanwhile, a handful of carrier executives are now taking “differentiation” seriously and are undertaking changes in their products and services to target that segment of the market that will value significantly better service that’s reliably delivered.

The challenge here, says Widdows, is that Alliance structures make implementation more difficult, as they don’t control terminal operations. “In my engagement with shippers over the last few years, I get a sense of a growing desire to seek out partners who can positively impact service and its effect on their supply chains,” he says.

Widdows is also the executive chairman of American Intermodal Management, which provides shipping, logistics, terminals and intermodal transportation consultancy services globally. Something of a legend in the ocean carrier arena, he served as the CEO of Rickmers Holding, based in Hamburg, Germany from April 2012 to April 2014. Prior to joining Rickmers, Widdows was group president and CEO of Neptune Orient Lines, the parent company of APL. His career with NOL/APL spanned more than 30 years.

“So, over the years, I’ve been with companies that had built a ‘service excellent’ carrier model, and a shipper portfolio that was based on accessing a disproportionate participation with those who would pay more,” says Widdows. The key objective, he adds, is for carriers to identify shippers who are less reliant on seasonal consumer demands and more willing to strike a profitable balance.

“This is especially true for shippers who need support for inland intermodal networks and equipment,” adds Widdows. “That portfolio produces a better bottom line for the carriers while giving them wider access to shippers seeking more value.”
Shippers do indeed recognize carriers who are willing to go that extra mile, says Peter Friedmann, executive director of the The Agriculture Transportation Coalition (AgTC). “With fewer top container lines vying for our business, it’s especially critical for us to give credit to those that deliver on their promises,” he says.

Each year, ocean carriers await the result of the AgTC’s Annual Survey, which ranks the carriers from best to worst. It has served to motivate some carriers to work with agriculture shippers to improve documentation and booking service. Hamburg Süd, Hyundai Merchant Marine and OOCL were the three highest ranked carriers in 2018.

“The survey ranks the different ocean carriers on such criteria as availability of equipment, availability of space on vessels, document accuracy and efficiency,” says Friedmann. “As shippers of time-critical commodities, we’re especially sensitive to a carrier’s willingness to accept export documentation as late as possible and adhere to advertised verses actual vessel schedule and transit time.”

Furthermore, adds Friedmann, carriers who deliver on their promises will capture more volume from Ag shippers who are willing to pay a premium price. “It’s a good situation for everyone,” he concludes. “And it may be the only way to keep the top carriers in business.”

 


About the Author

Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at [email protected]

Subscribe to Supply Chain Management Review Magazine!

Subscribe today. Don't Miss Out!
Get in-depth coverage from industry experts with proven techniques for cutting supply chain costs and case studies in supply chain best practices.
Start Your Subscription Today!

Latest Whitepaper
Supply Chain Planning with Prescriptive Analytics
Technology Enables a More Effective Process
Download Today!
From the September-October 2018
This month’s issue will help you in your job of staying ahead of the pack, following the leaders and, with luck, blazing the next trail.
The 2018 Supply Chain Top 25: Follow the leaders
NextGen technologies: Building the supply chains of the future
View More From this Issue
Subscribe to Our Email Newsletter
Sign up today to receive our FREE, weekly email newsletter!


Latest Webcast
Risk Management:  Where we are, Where we are going
Where are we and where are we going when it comes to risk management? Join Robert J. Trent, author and Professor of Supply Chain Management at Lehigh University, as he answers these questions in this webinar.
Register Today!
EDITORS' PICKS
Supply Chain Managers Hoping to See Rebound in Global Ocean Cargo Container Sector
The continued rise in fuel prices and chartering rates had a negative impact on the earnings of the...
APICS Awards of Excellence Salutes Prominent Supply Chain Leaders
APICS CEO Abe Eshkenazi noted that there was a “record-breaking” number of nominations in four...

How Inbound Logistics Networks Can Be a New Source of Savings
A capstone research project sponsored by a major CPG company looks at how different supply network...
Damco’s Supply Chain Services Under Maersk Banner Will Be Tracked Closely by Managers
Industry analysts have greeted the news with mixed forecasts....