Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.
July-August, 2010
I’ve always liked that old saying that good fortune favors the prepared mind (though I’ve faltered in my adherence to the principle as often as not). Reading the feature articles in this July/August issue only affirms the validity of that wisdom, this time in a supply chain context. From several instructive perspectives we learn about the value of carefully thinking about what you want to accomplish, how you want to accomplish it, and why you need to be flexible enough to respond if things don’t go exactly to plan. As our cover illustration suggests, it’s really about executing a supply chain game plan. Browse this issue archive.Need Help? Contact customer service 847-559-7581 More options
It can be said that the 1980s and the early part of the 1990s were the period of quality. The late 1990s and the early part of the first decade of the 21st century may be considered the era of lean. Now, as we enter into the second decade of the 21st century, we may fully be in the age of the supply chain. Supply chain management expands the reach of the firm beyond its immediate grasp to those places where competitive advantage is derived—in particular, the supplier base. Essentially, it is no longer firm competing against firm—Boeing against Airbus, Target against Walmart; rather, it is supply chain vs. supply chain.
As we shift the competitive focus from the firm to the supply chain, we must recognize that, like physical chains, no supply chain is stronger than its weakest link. However, when the weakest link resides beyond the boundary of the supply chain organizer (firm), significant problems can and do occur. This is particularly true with regard to the supplier base. In fact, one recent study found that 28 percent of the firms surveyed identified supplier failure and continuity of supply as their primary supply chain risk factor.
This raises an interesting issue: How does a firm ensure that it has the “right” set of suppliers in its supply chain? Addressing this cannot be left to chance. It is far too important—as any company that has suffered a supplier-related disruption can attest. The supplier base must be carefully and continuously managed. The supplier base must be managed strategically, not tactically; it must be managed with the perspective that the supplier base, like the business environment in which it operates, is dynamic and ever changing. That is, existing suppliers often leave (as a result of bankruptcy, acquisition, or changes in the buying company’s strategic direction) and new, attractive suppliers enter. Finally, the firm should recognize that managing a supplier base does not always mean supplier reductions. There may be strategic reasons why the base may need to be larger, rather than smaller…
A new approach is emerging called supplier base management (SBM) that effectively deals with these challenges. Supplier base management is a systematic, holistic, strategic approach to planning, developing, and managing the supplier base. This article introduces this concept and explores its implications within a supply chain context. In doing so, we draw an interesting analogy between SBM and professional baseball.
This complete article is available to subscribers
only. Click on Log In Now at the top of this article for full access. Or, Start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access. |
Not ready to subscribe, but need this article?
Buy the complete article now. Only $20.00. Instant PDF Download.
Access the complete issue of Supply Chain Management Review magazine featuring
this article including every word, chart and table exactly as it appeared in the magazine.
SC
MR
Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.
July-August, 2010
I’ve always liked that old saying that good fortune favors the prepared mind (though I’ve faltered in my adherence to the principle as often as not). Reading the feature articles in this July/August issue only… Browse this issue archive. Download a PDF file of the July-August, 2010 issue.Download Article PDF |
It can be said that the 1980s and the early part of the 1990s were the period of quality. The late 1990s and the early part of the first decade of the 21st century may be considered the era of lean. Now, as we enter into the second decade of the 21st century, we may fully be in the age of the supply chain. Supply chain management expands the reach of the firm beyond its immediate grasp to those places where competitive advantage is derived—in particular, the supplier base. Essentially, it is no longer firm competing against firm—Boeing against Airbus, Target against Walmart; rather, it is supply chain vs. supply chain.
As we shift the competitive focus from the firm to the supply chain, we must recognize that, like physical chains, no supply chain is stronger than its weakest link. However, when the weakest link resides beyond the boundary of the supply chain organizer (firm), significant problems can and do occur. This is particularly true with regard to the supplier base. In fact, one recent study found that 28 percent of the firms surveyed identified supplier failure and continuity of supply as their primary supply chain risk factor.
This raises an interesting issue: How does a firm ensure that it has the “right” set of suppliers in its supply chain? Addressing this cannot be left to chance. It is far too important—as any company that has suffered a supplier-related disruption can attest. The supplier base must be carefully and continuously managed. The supplier base must be managed strategically, not tactically; it must be managed with the perspective that the supplier base, like the business environment in which it operates, is dynamic and ever changing. That is, existing suppliers often leave (as a result of bankruptcy, acquisition, or changes in the buying company’s strategic direction) and new, attractive suppliers enter. Finally, the firm should recognize that managing a supplier base does not always mean supplier reductions. There may be strategic reasons why the base may need to be larger, rather than smaller…
A new approach is emerging called supplier base management (SBM) that effectively deals with these challenges. Supplier base management is a systematic, holistic, strategic approach to planning, developing, and managing the supplier base. This article introduces this concept and explores its implications within a supply chain context. In doing so, we draw an interesting analogy between SBM and professional baseball.
SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article. |
SC
MR
Latest Supply Chain News
- How CPG brands can deliver on supplier diversity promises
- How S&OP provides the answer to in-demand products
- AI, virtual reality is bringing experiential learning into the modern age
- Humanoid robots’ place in an intralogistics smart robot strategy
- Tips for CIOs to overcome technology talent acquisition troubles
- More News
Latest Podcast
Explore
Latest Supply Chain News
- How CPG brands can deliver on supplier diversity promises
- How S&OP provides the answer to in-demand products
- AI, virtual reality is bringing experiential learning into the modern age
- Humanoid robots’ place in an intralogistics smart robot strategy
- Tips for CIOs to overcome technology talent acquisition troubles
- There is still work to do to achieve supply chain stability
- More latest news