Perhaps the single most important distinction you need to make is to separate cost reduction from cost avoidance. Why do I say that? It’s simple.
Cost reduction in operating expenses can, generally, be tracked to changes in operating costs on the income statement. Cost avoidance doesn’t have the same ability. So, if you try to add cost avoidance to cost reduction, and then report your total “savings,” you’ve just created an apples & oranges amount that has absolutely no relevance to the P & L statement that your internal clients look at on a monthly basis.
That’s not to say that you should not track cost avoidance. I encourage clients to have a robust tracking system that tracks operating cost reductions, capital cost reductions, and cost avoidance. Just never add them together, or you will lose P & L relevance.
More in the next posting.

SC
MR

Latest Supply Chain News
- Procurement’s Moneyball Moment: Connecting Strategy, Sourcing, and Supply Chain Reality
- AI won’t fix a broken supply chain foundation
- How I vibe-coded an S&OP app in 30 hours
- The AI regulation gap: Risk, cost, and competitive advantage
- PepsiCo moves its startup sustainability program from pilots to operational scale across Asia Pacific
- More News
Latest Resources

Explore
Topics
Latest Supply Chain News
- PepsiCo moves its startup sustainability program from pilots to operational scale across Asia Pacific
- Eli Lilly’s Mar Gimeno to keynote at NextGen Supply Chain Conference 2026
- Agentic coding and the future of supply chain leadership
- From orbit to operations: Winning the race for the earliest disruption signal
- Stop moving boxes, start moving dollars: The new math of global supply chain velocity
- Finding your rhythm: SME supply chain footwork when the rules keep changing
- More latest news
Latest Resources

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.

Editors’ Picks
