Reward the Behavior—Not the Outcome

Even when opportunism doesn't occur or can't be proved, a trading partner who is bigger or creates a dependency situation can provoke action to redress the asymmetry.

Subscriber: Log Out

The tiff between Apple and Qualcomm demonstrates the typical and atypical realities of supply chain relationships. Qualcomm is a giant with a long-term strategy whose patents dominate the modem market, such as the chips that go into Apple's wireless devices.

The FTC and Apple allege that Qualcomm used its supplier power to coerce Apple into buying products that generated royalties for Qualcomm—an all-too-typical supply chain scenario of a large player throwing its weight.

Atypically, Apple has grown enough to potentially out-weigh the Qualcomm gorilla. Given Qualcomm's sheepish response—downplaying the dispute as a “pricing disagreement”—Apple seems likely to increase its share of the money harvested from the consumer end market.

Leveraging buying or selling power is the go-to strategy prescription, yet too seldom are its perverse long-term incentives recognized. The Kobe Steel scandal demonstrates that when the customers get the lion's share of the end-market profits, suppliers have little real reason to please highly demanding (and tight-fisted) customers and a lot of motive to cut costs, even if it means lying about product quality.

Even when opportunism doesn't occur or can't be proved, a trading partner who is bigger or creates a dependency situation can provoke action to redress the asymmetry.

For example, engine provider United Technologies acquired Rockwell Collins in order to gain more leverage over Boeing and Airbus – the world's two largest aircraft producers with almost a trillion dollars in orders between them – despite the fact that engines enjoy higher margins than aircraft.

Rewarding the right behavior rather than the right outcome is too seldom considered as a supply chain strategy. The former incorporates long-term thinking, while the latter focuses on the short-term.

Learning how to incentivize right behaviors will become more important as the digital economy progresses because all the steps of the contracting process can be digitized, and relationships will be changed more frequently, as many companies have already experienced.

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Talking Supply Chain: Doomsday never arrives for Baltimore bridge collapse impacts
The collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key bridge brought doomsday headlines for the supply chain. But the reality has been something less…
Listen in

About the Author

Michael Gravier, Associate Professor
Michael Gravier

Michael Gravier is a Professor of Marketing and Supply Chain Management at Bryant University with a focus on logistics, supply chain management and strategy and international trade. Follow Bryant University on Facebook and Twitter.

View Michael's author profile.

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service