•   Exclusive

Open Innovation: Putting External Knowledge to Work

Innovation is no longer the sole preserve of the R&D department. These days, companies draw practical inspiration and profitable ideas from far and wide— from suppliers, academia, competitors, customers, and through crowdsourcing.

Subscriber: Log Out

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

This is an excerpt of the original article. It was written for the November 2012 edition of Supply Chain Management Review. The full article is available to current subscribers.

November 2012

We’ve all heard about the advantage of being a preferred customer to your buyers. Now we learn that it’s just as important to become a good customer to your key suppliers. This article explains the benefits of becoming a preferred customer and lays out the actions needed to become one.
Browse this issue archive.
Already a subscriber? Access full edition now.

Need Help?
Contact customer service
847-559-7581   More options
Not a subscriber? Start your magazine subscription.

Gone are the days when the research and development department was considered the font of all innovation in the company. These days, businesses draw practical inspiration and profitable ideas from far and wide. More and more, corporate leaders recognize that their organizations can no longer innovate by themselves because competition is more intense and faster-paced and because globalization presents many more innovation opportunities — and threats.

Today, new product ideas can and regularly do come from suppliers. Others may come from relationships between the marketing departments of companies in different industries, or from formal and informal links with academia and independent research centers. And increasingly, companies are turning to Web-based crowdsourcing, reaching out to strangers to propose solutions that their own scientists and engineers may never think of.

But the trend toward so-called “open innovation” raises a host of new questions. Is this practice—sometimes also called collaborative innovation, or shared or distributed innovation—really more effective than centralized R&D activities? If so, how do we know? What kinds of open innovation work best? Assuming that it is beneficial, whose job is it to lead such “outside in” innovation, and how should open innovation activities be organized within the company? How can businesses ensure that the necessary external relationships are effective? And is open innovation necessarily ad hoc, or can it be systemized?

Recent research sheds some light on those questions. Together, i7, the Institute for Innovation and Competitiveness (a European academic think tank created by ESCP Europe Business School) and Accenture’s management consulting unit conducted a joint study to analyze innovation practices and processes, supply management, and cross-company collaborations. We explored how open innovation changes the way companies build and handle external partnerships, organize and stimulate innovation internally, and what impact it has on innovation performance.

 

This complete article is available to subscribers only.
Click on Log In Now at the top of this article for full access.
Or, Start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.

Not ready to subscribe, but need this article?
Buy the complete article now. Only $20.00. Instant PDF Download
.
Access the complete issue of Supply Chain Management Review magazine featuring
this article including every word, chart and table exactly as it appeared in the magazine.

SC
MR

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

From the November 2012 edition of Supply Chain Management Review.

November 2012

We’ve all heard about the advantage of being a preferred customer to your buyers. Now we learn that it’s just as important to become a good customer to your key suppliers. This article explains the benefits of…
Browse this issue archive.
Access your online digital edition.
Download a PDF file of the November 2012 issue.

Download Article PDF

Gone are the days when the research and development department was considered the font of all innovation in the company. These days, businesses draw practical inspiration and profitable ideas from far and wide. More and more, corporate leaders recognize that their organizations can no longer innovate by themselves because competition is more intense and faster-paced and because globalization presents many more innovation opportunities — and threats.

Today, new product ideas can and regularly do come from suppliers. Others may come from relationships between the marketing departments of companies in different industries, or from formal and informal links with academia and independent research centers. And increasingly, companies are turning to Web-based crowdsourcing, reaching out to strangers to propose solutions that their own scientists and engineers may never think of.

But the trend toward so-called “open innovation” raises a host of new questions. Is this practice—sometimes also called collaborative innovation, or shared or distributed innovation—really more effective than centralized R&D activities? If so, how do we know? What kinds of open innovation work best? Assuming that it is beneficial, whose job is it to lead such “outside in” innovation, and how should open innovation activities be organized within the company? How can businesses ensure that the necessary external relationships are effective? And is open innovation necessarily ad hoc, or can it be systemized?

Recent research sheds some light on those questions. Together, i7, the Institute for Innovation and Competitiveness (a European academic think tank created by ESCP Europe Business School) and Accenture’s management consulting unit conducted a joint study to analyze innovation practices and processes, supply management, and cross-company collaborations. We explored how open innovation changes the way companies build and handle external partnerships, organize and stimulate innovation internally, and what impact it has on innovation performance.

SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article.

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Talking Supply Chain: Doomsday never arrives for Baltimore bridge collapse impacts
The collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key bridge brought doomsday headlines for the supply chain. But the reality has been something less…
Listen in

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service