•   Exclusive

New studies measure the benefits of the circular economy

The concept is conceived as a continuous positive development cycle that preserves and enhances natural capital, optimizes resource yields and minimizes system risks by managing finite stocks and renewable flows.

Subscriber: Log Out

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

This is an excerpt of the original article. It was written for the May-June 2018 edition of Supply Chain Management Review. The full article is available to current subscribers.

May-June 2018

Last month, I was in Atlanta at the Modex trade show. In one sense, it is a tribute to the automation technologies managing today’s distribution networks. And, I’m not only talking about automated materials handling systems, but also the software and NextGen technologies such as robotics, wearable technologies, including smart glasses and augmented reality solutions and sensors enabling the Internet of Things. In another sense, all of these solutions are coming together to drive fulfillment. With the increase in e-commerce, getting the right product to the right customer at the right time has never been more important.
Browse this issue archive.
Already a subscriber? Access full edition now.

Need Help?
Contact customer service
847-559-7581   More options
Not a subscriber? Start your magazine subscription.

Two reports from prominent global think tanks bring into question some past “best practices” of supply chain management, which may soon be regarded as not only antiquated, but wasteful as well.

Researchers from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation maintain that the linear “take, make, dispose” model—the dominant economic template of our time—relies on large quantities of easily accessible resources and energy, and therefore is increasingly unfit for today’s complex global trade networks.

Unfortunately, researchers add, working toward efficiency by reducing the resources and fossil energy consumed per unit of economic output will not alter the finite nature of their stocks—but can only “delay the inevitable.”

They conclude that a more fundamental change of the operating system is necessary because the concept of the circular economy has been gaining traction for a variety of obvious reasons. According to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, the circular economy is characterized (more than defined) as “an economy that is restorative and regenerative by design and which aims to keep products, components and materials at their highest utility and value at all times.”

This complete article is available to subscribers only. Log in now for full access or start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.

SC
MR

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

From the May-June 2018 edition of Supply Chain Management Review.

May-June 2018

Last month, I was in Atlanta at the Modex trade show. In one sense, it is a tribute to the automation technologies managing today’s distribution networks. And, I’m not only talking about automated materials…
Browse this issue archive.
Access your online digital edition.
Download a PDF file of the May-June 2018 issue.

Two reports from prominent global think tanks bring into question some past “best practices” of supply chain management, which may soon be regarded as not only antiquated, but wasteful as well.

Researchers from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation maintain that the linear “take, make, dispose” model—the dominant economic template of our time—relies on large quantities of easily accessible resources and energy, and therefore is increasingly unfit for today's complex global trade networks.

Unfortunately, researchers add, working toward efficiency by reducing the resources and fossil energy consumed per unit of economic output will not alter the finite nature of their stocks—but can only “delay the inevitable.”

They conclude that a more fundamental change of the operating system is necessary because the concept of the circular economy has been gaining traction for a variety of obvious reasons. According to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, the circular economy is characterized (more than defined) as “an economy that is restorative and regenerative by design and which aims to keep products, components and materials at their highest utility and value at all times.”

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Talking Supply Chain: Doomsday never arrives for Baltimore bridge collapse impacts
The collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key bridge brought doomsday headlines for the supply chain. But the reality has been something less…
Listen in

About the Author

Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson

Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor specializing in international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He is based in San Francisco, where he provides a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. He may be reached at his downtown office: [email protected].

View Patrick 's author profile.

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service