•   Exclusive

Leveraging Supply Chain Finance

The evolving supply chain finance sector is making it easier for suppliers and buyers to work out their own win-win financial arrangements.

Subscriber: Log Out

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

This is an excerpt of the original article. It was written for the March-April 2018 edition of Supply Chain Management Review. The full article is available to current subscribers.

March-April 2018

"Inflation creeps into U.S. Supply Chain.” So said the headline on a Wall Street Journal article I read this morning before writing this column. The Journal went on to write that U.S. companies are grappling with rising material and ingredient costs on top of pressure from higher wages—a potential double whammy— and noted that companies like Whirlpool and Ford have already issued warnings to the market.
Browse this issue archive.
Already a subscriber? Access full edition now.

Need Help?
Contact customer service
847-559-7581   More options
Not a subscriber? Start your magazine subscription.

In a business climate where optimizing cash flow, lengthening payment terms and preserving financial assets have become strategic imperatives for most companies, supply chain, or supplier, finance is gaining in popularity across the global supply chain. Through a “reverse factoring” process, this financing option finds suppliers “selling” their invoices to a bank or other entity at a discount, and then paying those invoices later while suppliers get paid earlier.

Rather than relying on the individual supplier’s credit, the middleman (usually a bank) deals directly with the buyer. A large, global manufacturer, for example, can use supply chain finance to pay its suppliers later, thus boosting its own working capital while holding onto its cash for a longer period of time.

In a best-case scenario, both supplier and buyer improve their own working capital while the middleman receives a fee for its services. And because the risk is transferred to one buyer (versus a group of buyers, as in the case of factoring), it tends to be a less expensive and less risky proposition. Through it all, the end game is to give suppliers access to beneficial financing options as a result of the buyer’s good credit rating.

This complete article is available to subscribers only. Log in now for full access or start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.

SC
MR

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

From the March-April 2018 edition of Supply Chain Management Review.

March-April 2018

"Inflation creeps into U.S. Supply Chain.” So said the headline on a Wall Street Journal article I read this morning before writing this column. The Journal went on to write that U.S. companies are grappling…
Browse this issue archive.
Access your online digital edition.
Download a PDF file of the March-April 2018 issue.

In a business climate where optimizing cash flow, lengthening payment terms and preserving financial assets have become strategic imperatives for most companies, supply chain, or supplier, finance is gaining in popularity across the global supply chain. Through a “reverse factoring” process, this financing option finds suppliers “selling” their invoices to a bank or other entity at a discount, and then paying those invoices later while suppliers get paid earlier.

Rather than relying on the individual supplier's credit, the middleman (usually a bank) deals directly with the buyer. A large, global manufacturer, for example, can use supply chain finance to pay its suppliers later, thus boosting its own working capital while holding onto its cash for a longer period of time.

In a best-case scenario, both supplier and buyer improve their own working capital while the middleman receives a fee for its services. And because the risk is transferred to one buyer (versus a group of buyers, as in the case of factoring), it tends to be a less expensive and less risky proposition. Through it all, the end game is to give suppliers access to beneficial financing options as a result of the buyer's good credit rating.

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Talking Supply Chain: Understanding the FTC’s ban on noncompetes
Crowell & Moring law partner Stefan Meisner joined the Talking Supply Chain podcast to discuss the recent decision by the Federal Trade…
Listen in

About the Author

Bridget McCrea, Contributing Editor
Bridget McCrea's Bio Photo

Bridget McCrea is a Contributing Editor for Logistics Management based in Clearwater, Fla. She has covered the transportation and supply chain space since 1996 and has covered all aspects of the industry for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review. She can be reached at [email protected], or on Twitter @BridgetMcCrea

View Bridget's author profile.

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service