Leadership Sometimes Means Saying No to a Good Thing
The problem of avoiding rather than overcoming challenges is not new, and not limited to compliance.
Latest News
Are Your Data Visualizations Readable by Everyone? Supply Chains Facing New Pressures as Companies Seek Cost Savings February retail sales see annual and sequential gains, reports Commerce and NRF A Hoarding Explanation for the Post-COVID Inflation for Goods Digital Approaches, End-to-End Thinking Help Supply Chains Evolve More NewsLatest Resource
Vendor Evaluation Questionnaire for RFPs Don't miss out on the perfect Yard and Dock management software for your warehouse operations. Save time and stress with this handy Toolkit.All Resources
Supply chains are showing an increasingly worrying trend – companies opt to take short cuts rather than make themselves better, sometimes in spectacular fashion.
Last month BMW, Daimler and Volkswagen were raided by German authorities for colluding to buy steel – and this while the “German Big Three” are still negotiating with authorities for cheating on emissions tests. Other automotive manufacturers have had issues with their fuel efficiency numbers: Hyundai/Kia, Ford, Mitsubishi, General Motors, and more – while European manufacturers of diesel engines have requested a 70% greater allowance for emissions.
The problem of avoiding rather than overcoming challenges is not new, and not limited to compliance. Looking again at the automotive supply chain, the Takata airbag scandal shows how desperate car companies were to accept a few dollars of savings—most didn’t question Takata’s use of ammonium nitrate, an airbag propellant that was known to be inherently unstable, despite the company’s inability to produce convincing test data.
Supply chain managers must play the role of linchpin to prevent these scandals. These events not only invite more (costly) scrutiny from government, they also destroy customer confidence, frequently leading to the creation of more compliance requirements. A “vicious circle” results because requirements testing and quality assurance reflect an “after-the-fact” approach that bakes-in the cost-benefit comparison of complying vs. getting caught. Supply chain managers sit in the ideal position to identify opportunities to create synergies between companies—and to preempt disincentives to good outcomes. Being a leader means sometimes saying no to something “too good to be true.”
About the Author
Michael Gravier Michael Gravier is a Professor of Marketing and Supply Chain Management at Bryant University with a focus on logistics, supply chain management and strategy and international trade. Follow Bryant University on Facebook and Twitter.Subscribe to Supply Chain Management Review Magazine!
Subscribe today. Don't Miss Out!Get in-depth coverage from industry experts with proven techniques for cutting supply chain costs and case studies in supply chain best practices.
Start Your Subscription Today!
It’s high time to go beyond visibility Driving supply chain flexibility in an uncertain and volatile world View More From this Issue