Innovation is a team activity
Successful innovation projects include team members who can collaborate across multiple functional areas. How is your supply chain team performing?
Supply chain management is a team endeavor, and developing an effective operational team is a challenge for any organization. But including innovation in the mix compounds that challenge. A study conducted last January by the MIT Supply Chain Strategy Lab sheds light on the dynamics of supply chain teams, and the factors that impact their performance. The study indicates that to successfully tackle innovation projects, a supply chain team should be composed of members with the knowledge, visibility, commitment and competence necessary to collaborate across multiple functional areas in the pursuit of shared objectives.
Simulation exercise
The sample for the study was a group of 112 master’s students from the MIT Global SCALE Network, an international alliance of supply chain education and research centers, which at the time had four centers in the United States, Europe, Asia and Latin America (the Network has since added two centers in China and Luxembourg). Over a period of three weeks that these students spent at MIT’s campus in Cambridge, Mass., they took part in a supply chain simulation known as The Fresh Connection. Students were grouped in teams of four members, chosen by a third party to maximize the diversity of centers represented in each team. The typical team was composed of students from four different centers who had never met each other.
The Fresh Connection simulation revolves around a fictitious company based in the Netherlands that manufactures and sells orange juice. At the beginning of the game the company is operating at a loss, and the mission of the team is to rescue it by making it profitable again. In the simulation, there are four functional positions in the company, focusing respectively on purchasing, operations, logistics and sales. Each function is helmed by a different student. Although they do have visibility into each other’s decisions, each one of these four positions controls only the decisions that correspond to their respective functions. Because there is no fifth position overseeing and coordinating the efforts of the previous four, the members have to find a way to work as a team—as opposed to operating as independent functions—in order to achieve the common goal of maximizing the company’s return on investment (ROI).
This complete article is available to subscribers
only. Click on Log In Now at the top of this article for full access. Or, Start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access. |
Latest News
Are Your Data Visualizations Readable by Everyone? Supply Chains Facing New Pressures as Companies Seek Cost Savings February retail sales see annual and sequential gains, reports Commerce and NRF A Hoarding Explanation for the Post-COVID Inflation for Goods Digital Approaches, End-to-End Thinking Help Supply Chains Evolve More NewsLatest Resource
Vendor Evaluation Questionnaire for RFPs Don't miss out on the perfect Yard and Dock management software for your warehouse operations. Save time and stress with this handy Toolkit.All Resources
Download Article PDF |
Supply chain management is a team endeavor, and developing an effective operational team is a challenge for any organization. But including innovation in the mix compounds that challenge.
A study conducted last January by the MIT Supply Chain Strategy Lab sheds light on the dynamics of supply chain teams, and the factors that impact their performance. The study indicates that to successfully tackle innovation projects, a supply chain team should be composed of members with the knowledge, visibility, commitment and competence necessary to collaborate across multiple functional areas in the pursuit of shared objectives.
Simulation exercise
The sample for the study was a group of 112 master’s students from the MIT Global SCALE Network, an international alliance of supply chain education and research centers, which at the time had four centers in the United States, Europe, Asia and Latin America (the Network has since added two centers in China and Luxembourg). Over a period of three weeks that these students spent at MIT’s campus in Cambridge, Mass., they took part in a supply chain simulation known as The Fresh Connection. Students were grouped in teams of four members, chosen by a third party to maximize the diversity of centers represented in each team. The typical team was composed of students from four different centers who had never met each other.
The Fresh Connection simulation revolves around a fictitious company based in the Netherlands that manufactures and sells orange juice. At the beginning of the game the company is operating at a loss, and the mission of the team is to rescue it by making it profitable again. In the simulation, there are four functional positions in the company, focusing respectively on purchasing, operations, logistics and sales. Each function is helmed by a different student. Although they do have visibility into each other’s decisions, each one of these four positions controls only the decisions that correspond to their respective functions. Because there is no fifth position overseeing and coordinating the efforts of the previous four, the members have to find a way to work as a team—as opposed to operating as independent functions—in order to achieve the common goal of maximizing the company’s return on investment (ROI).
SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article. |
Subscribe to Supply Chain Management Review Magazine!
Subscribe today. Don't Miss Out!Get in-depth coverage from industry experts with proven techniques for cutting supply chain costs and case studies in supply chain best practices.
Start Your Subscription Today!
It’s high time to go beyond visibility Driving supply chain flexibility in an uncertain and volatile world View More From this Issue