Global Ports Remain Vulnerable to Virus-Related Disruption, Say Fitch Ratings
Most European and Middle Eastern ports have significant exposure to China through the global supply chain and port revenues will be stressed if volumes remain depressed through March or beyond.
Latest News
Port of Baltimore May Not Reopen Until Summer Sales & Operations Planning (S&OP) Mastery A New Priority Greets Procurement Professionals in 2024 Cargo Shipping Remains on Hold in Baltimore Following Bridge Collapse Maximizing the Bottom Line: The Power of Procurement More NewsLatest Resource
Sales & Operations Planning (S&OP) Mastery In this Special Digital Edition of Supply Chain Management Review, you will find insights on the importance of sales and operations planning (S&OP) to an organization’s bottom line.All Resources
Global ports will see reduced trade volumes as a result of the coronavirus, COVID-19, which would become more severe should Chinese production take time to recover to pre-epidemic levels, says Fitch Ratings.
Decreased production in China because of the extended work holiday and factory closures will affect import and export volumes in first-quarter 2020 but diversified revenue streams and long-term contracts help shield most U.S., EMEA and LATAM port revenues from significant trade volatility. However, some rated APAC ports will be affected if the slowdown in trade is prolonged.
China’s trade volumes have grown significantly since 2000 in tandem with China’s expanding role in the world economy. If more companies suspend Chinese operations or withdraw from production in China, shipping volume may take longer to recover. A sustained dip in volumes could pressure ports with a large exposure to China cargo and would constrain throughput growth compared with expectations prior to the outbreak.
“Reduced trade due to the virus exacerbates the effects of the 2018-2019 trade barriers on U.S. West Coast port volumes in particular,” says Emma Griffith, Senior Director, Infrastructure and Project Finance, Americas, “U.S.-China trade levels were expected to pick up somewhat with Phase One of the U.S.-China trade deal set to go into effect on Feb. 15 but this rebound may take longer to take hold because of the virus-related production slowdown.”
Port of Oakland Maritime Director John Driscoll also recently expressed concern over the fast-spreading coronavirus dampening trade growth.
“It’s possible,” he says. “Although import volume at our port has been on an uptick so far.”
Most European and Middle Eastern ports have significant exposure to China through the global supply chain and port revenues will be stressed if volumes remain depressed through March or beyond. Some EU manufacturing sectors are dependent upon the Chinese market. Middle East export volumes will be hurt by significant declines in Chinese demand for oil. Balance sheet flexibility and the ability to defer capex should help ports manage through short-term volume declines. Ports with additional congestion such as shipping boxes piling up could potentially charge more for storage and handling, which could be a partial offsetting factor for lost revenue.
In some cases, ports’ long-term guaranteed contracts or lease agreements with most tenants provide a revenue floor, which helps to insulate port revenue from trade-related volume volatility. This is the case for the more exposed U.S. West Coast ports, where minimum annual guarantees cover 70% plus of operating revenue, and the Port of Melbourne in Australia, where one-third of revenue is independent of shipping volumes.
Fitch-rated Australian coal export terminals will see a volume impact from prolonged slowdown in industrial activity in China. However, the revenues of these export terminals are largely independent of throughput due to the use-or-pay nature of their contracts with the coal mines. Indonesian coal terminals, however, will be hit as Indonesia exports about one-quarter of its coal to China. Throughput at other Indonesian ports will also be affected as China is the country’s top trading partner. India, on the other hand, has less trade exposure to China than Indonesia, and Indian port operators are better placed to absorb a reduction in trade.
About the Author
Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor Mr. Burnson is a widely-published writer and editor specializing in international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He is based in San Francisco, where he provides a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. He may be reached at his downtown office: [email protected].Subscribe to Supply Chain Management Review Magazine!
Subscribe today. Don't Miss Out!Get in-depth coverage from industry experts with proven techniques for cutting supply chain costs and case studies in supply chain best practices.
Start Your Subscription Today!
It’s high time to go beyond visibility Driving supply chain flexibility in an uncertain and volatile world View More From this Issue