“Embedding Risk Management”
For a Supply Chain Risk Management program to be effective it must be embedded within your sourcing process.
Latest News
Port of Baltimore May Not Reopen Until Summer Sales & Operations Planning (S&OP) Mastery A New Priority Greets Procurement Professionals in 2024 Cargo Shipping Remains on Hold in Baltimore Following Bridge Collapse Maximizing the Bottom Line: The Power of Procurement More NewsLatest Resource
Sales & Operations Planning (S&OP) Mastery In this Special Digital Edition of Supply Chain Management Review, you will find insights on the importance of sales and operations planning (S&OP) to an organization’s bottom line.All Resources
Today’s guest blogger is my colleague James Baehr, a Senior Advisor at Greybeard Advisors LLC, and a contributing author of the new book “Next Level Supply Management Excellence: Your Straight to the Bottom Line® Roadmap.” Jim can be reached at: [email protected]
For a Supply Chain Risk Management program to be effective it must be embedded within your sourcing process. Numerous reports show that supply risks have continued to grow over the past decade. This isn’t a surprise as supply chains have become more complex, covering a broader geography, and compounded by heightened internal and external expectations. Risk management approaches should be tailored to the acquisition process and take into account all phases of the life cycle of a product or service. Risk management is forward looking and anticipates causes and consequences; otherwise it becomes “issue management” where resources are applied to resolve a current problem or emergency.
A complete Risk Management Process is made up of risk analysis (identification and assessment), risk mitigation (what to do) and risk monitoring (watching) - all should be continuous. Too many supply chain risks are addressed by improvisation, which is a clear indicator that there is no management process. While it’s human nature to take satisfaction from solving a problem, it’s typically a very costly way of doing business. Think of the difference between installing a traffic light at a busy intersection – you can anticipate accidents and plan accordingly or you can wait until an accident, or several, occur and then install the traffic light – good old fashioned proactive versus reactive thinking.
If your company uses a strategic sourcing process, are you taking into consideration the risks that can be incurred if your sourcing strategy is implemented? Or, are you weighing price too heavily and relegating risks to being afterthoughts? The development of sourcing strategies is the best time to address supply risks. Cross-functional teams can help define and identify the risks. The risks can be built into the Request for “x” to assess what can be done to anticipate the risk and mitigation of the risks can be negotiated in the agreement with the provider. Keep in mind that Risk Management is an ongoing process and doesn’t end with the signing of a contract.
About the Author
Robert A Rudzki Robert A. Rudzki is a former Fortune 500 Senior Vice President & Chief Procurement Officer, who is now President of Greybeard Advisors LLC, a leading provider of advisory services for procurement transformation, strategic sourcing, and supply chain management. Bob is also the author of several leading business books including the supply management best-seller "Straight to the Bottom Line®", its highly-endorsed sequel "Next Level Supply Management Excellence," and the leadership book "Beat the Odds: Avoid Corporate Death & Build a Resilient Enterprise." You can reach him through his firm's website: www.GreybeardAdvisors.comSubscribe to Supply Chain Management Review Magazine!
Subscribe today. Don't Miss Out!Get in-depth coverage from industry experts with proven techniques for cutting supply chain costs and case studies in supply chain best practices.
Start Your Subscription Today!
It’s high time to go beyond visibility Driving supply chain flexibility in an uncertain and volatile world View More From this Issue