Defend the company brand, too
Looking back at 10 years’ worth of columns, I see two related supply chain trends that need to evolve more quickly.
I am completing my 10th year as the “Insights” columnist. Those of you who have fgloollowed the column during my tenure, or have possibly attended one of my numerous presentations, already know that I am passionate about supply chain management (SCM). I began my career in marketing management where I stayed until I joined Accenture’s logistics and supply chain consulting practice in 1990. Since then, I’ve been lucky to be involved in SCM’s phenomenal evolution—fostered by the growth in global trade and consumerism. SCM is a profession with noble goals, benefiting the world by fulfilling the needs of global citizens, while efficiently using Earth’s precious resources.
When I look back over 10 year’s worth of columns, I see two important trends that need to evolve more quickly. One is the transition from integrated to integrative supply chain management, while the other is supply chains’ emerging role as a defender of the company brand. I believe the two are related to each other. When I look forward, my expectation for the profession is a tall order for managers to fulfill—but it is one that is shared by most of my colleagues.
Integrated versus integrative SCM
Let’s start by looking at integrated versus integrative SCM. Historically, SCM’s major goal has been to ensure that a company balances its supply-side activities to most effectively and efficiently create supply to match customer demand, while meeting corporate objectives such as financial performance targets. Companies have traditionally organized SCM groups around this goal. However, our “noble goals” are broader and more important than just that one. Ultimately, our goals ought to include such things as creating the most competitive supply chain in our vertical—something I have writ¬ten about extensively—and producing the high¬est quality for all products and services sold by our companies. The latter does not just include a physical product’s quality, as purchasing and manufacturing organizations are responsible for that. SCM groups need to organize around fulfilling these additional goals as well.
This complete article is available to subscribers
only. Click on Log In Now at the top of this article for full access. Or, Start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access. |
Latest News
Are Your Data Visualizations Readable by Everyone? Supply Chains Facing New Pressures as Companies Seek Cost Savings February retail sales see annual and sequential gains, reports Commerce and NRF A Hoarding Explanation for the Post-COVID Inflation for Goods Digital Approaches, End-to-End Thinking Help Supply Chains Evolve More NewsLatest Resource
Vendor Evaluation Questionnaire for RFPs Don't miss out on the perfect Yard and Dock management software for your warehouse operations. Save time and stress with this handy Toolkit.All Resources
Download Article PDF |
I am completing my 10th year as the “Insights” columnist. Those of you who have followed the column during my tenure, or have possibly attended one of my numerous presentations, already know that I am passionate about supply chain management (SCM). I began my career in marketing management where I stayed until I joined Accenture’s logistics and supply chain consulting practice in 1990. Since then, I’ve been lucky to be involved in SCM’s phenomenal evolution—fostered by the growth in global trade and consumerism. SCM is a profession with noble goals, benefiting the world by fulfilling the needs of global citizens, while efficiently using Earth’s precious resources.
When I look back over 10 year’s worth of columns, I see two important trends that need to evolve more quickly. One is the transition from integrated to integrative supply chain management, while the other is supply chains’ emerging role as a defender of the company brand. I believe the two are related to each other. When I look forward, my expectation for the profession is a tall order for managers to fulfill—but it is one that is shared by most of my colleagues.
Integrated versus integrative SCM
Let’s start by looking at integrated versus integrative SCM. Historically, SCM’s major goal has been to ensure that a company balances its supply-side activities to most effectively and efficiently create supply to match customer demand, while meeting corporate objectives such as financial performance targets. Companies have traditionally organized SCM groups around this goal. However, our “noble goals” are broader and more important than just that one. Ultimately, our goals ought to include such things as creating the most competitive supply chain in our vertical—something I have written about extensively—and producing the highest quality for all products and services sold by our companies. The latter does not just include a physical product’s quality, as purchasing and manufacturing organizations are responsible for that. SCM groups need to organize around fulfilling these additional goals as well.
SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article. |
About the Author
Larry Lapide Dr. Lapide is a lecturer at the University of Massachusetts’ Boston Campus and is an MIT Research Affiliate. He received the inaugural Lifetime Achievement in Business Forecasting & Planning Award from the Institute of Business Forecasting & Planning. Dr. Lapide can be reached at: [email protected].Subscribe to Supply Chain Management Review Magazine!
Subscribe today. Don't Miss Out!Get in-depth coverage from industry experts with proven techniques for cutting supply chain costs and case studies in supply chain best practices.
Start Your Subscription Today!
It’s high time to go beyond visibility Driving supply chain flexibility in an uncertain and volatile world View More From this Issue