Competitive Supply Chains: Optimized Demand Management
Author’s note: This is the third in a series of columns on competitive supply chains.
Author’s note: This is the third in a series of columns on competitive supply chains. The first, “Supply Chains: Excellence,” appeared in the July/August 2015 issue. It defined an excellent supply chain as one that plays a major role in competing and identified the four salient requisite characteristics of excellent supply chains. The second, “Competitive Supply Chains: Strategic Alignment,” appeared in the September/October 2015 issue. It offered a planning process for aligning a supply chain to enable competitiveness. This third and final column in the series looks at the need to implement Demand Management (DM) processes that formally enable supply- and demand-side managers to collaborate over time. Without formal, routine joint decision-making processes, a supply chain organization is not really playing a major role in executing a corporate strategy, even if it is strategically aligned. - Larry Lapide
I have often researched, spoken, and written about the Sales and Operation Planning (S&OP) process, especially addressing supply chain manager issues. Speaking before supply chain audiences, I point out that this “matching of supply and demand” planning process has been a major focus of mine because, before joining the supply chain community, I started my career on the “dark side.” Many in the audience smile when I ask: What do I mean by that?
My Demand-Supply Perspective
Most assume that I came from sales. Actually, for the first 15 years of my career I was in marketing. I point out that too many in the audience don’t really know or care about the difference between the marketing and sales functions because “all those managers complicate things for supply chain folks, making our jobs harder!” However, there is a difference. A sales rep is responsible for selling the products a company has today, while a marketing manager focuses on promoting products and ensuring that a company has products to sell in the future. Thus, marketing is a strategic function. In the S&OP process, sales offers valuable input about short-term revenues, while marketing is more knowledgeable about the long-term.
This complete article is available to subscribers
only. Click on Log In Now at the top of this article for full access. Or, Start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access. |
Latest News
Are Your Data Visualizations Readable by Everyone? Supply Chains Facing New Pressures as Companies Seek Cost Savings February retail sales see annual and sequential gains, reports Commerce and NRF A Hoarding Explanation for the Post-COVID Inflation for Goods Digital Approaches, End-to-End Thinking Help Supply Chains Evolve More NewsLatest Resource
Vendor Evaluation Questionnaire for RFPs Don't miss out on the perfect Yard and Dock management software for your warehouse operations. Save time and stress with this handy Toolkit.All Resources
Download Article PDF |
Author’s note: This is the third in a series of columns on competitive supply chains. The first, “Supply Chains: Excellence,” appeared in the July/August 2015 issue. It defined an excellent supply chain as one that plays a major role in competing and identified the four salient requisite characteristics of excellent supply chains. The second, “Competitive Supply Chains: Strategic Alignment,” appeared in the September/October 2015 issue. It offered a planning process for aligning a supply chain to enable competitiveness. This third and final column in the series looks at the need to implement Demand Management (DM) processes that formally enable supply- and demand-side managers to collaborate over time. Without formal, routine joint decision-making processes, a supply chain organization is not really playing a major role in executing a corporate strategy, even if it is strategically aligned. - Larry Lapide
I have often researched, spoken, and written about the Sales and Operation Planning (S&OP) process, especially addressing supply chain manager issues. Speaking before supply chain audiences, I point out that this “matching of supply and demand” planning process has been a major focus of mine because, before joining the supply chain community, I started my career on the “dark side.” Many in the audience smile when I ask: What do I mean by that?
My Demand-Supply Perspective
Most assume that I came from sales. Actually, for the first 15 years of my career I was in marketing. I point out that too many in the audience don’t really know or care about the difference between the marketing and sales functions because “all those managers complicate things for supply chain folks, making our jobs harder!” However, there is a difference. A sales rep is responsible for selling the products a company has today, while a marketing manager focuses on promoting products and ensuring that a company has products to sell in the future. Thus, marketing is a strategic function. In the S&OP process, sales offers valuable input about short-term revenues, while marketing is more knowledgeable about the long-term.
SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article. |
About the Author
Larry Lapide Dr. Lapide is a lecturer at the University of Massachusetts’ Boston Campus and is an MIT Research Affiliate. He received the inaugural Lifetime Achievement in Business Forecasting & Planning Award from the Institute of Business Forecasting & Planning. Dr. Lapide can be reached at: [email protected].Subscribe to Supply Chain Management Review Magazine!
Subscribe today. Don't Miss Out!Get in-depth coverage from industry experts with proven techniques for cutting supply chain costs and case studies in supply chain best practices.
Start Your Subscription Today!
It’s high time to go beyond visibility Driving supply chain flexibility in an uncertain and volatile world View More From this Issue