•   Exclusive

Collaboration leads to clear benefits for procurement and product development

Suppliers can inform product development and the R&D group can help select the best suppliers.

Subscriber: Log Out

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

This is an excerpt of the original article. It was written for the May-June 2016 edition of Supply Chain Management Review. The full article is available to current subscribers.

May-June 2016

The procurement function is at an inflection point.” So begins “The reinvention of procurement," an article by Jonathan Hughes and Danny Ertel, partners at the Boston-based consulting firm Vantage Partners. The authors argue that while many leading companies have transformed their procurement organizations into a linchpin of their enterprise strategy, far too many others remain trapped by procurement models that are out of date in today’s fastpaced economy, where the acquisition of innovation, collaboration, services and solutions is more important than transactions based on the lowest cost per unit. Reinvention is a fitting theme for…
Browse this issue archive.
Already a subscriber? Access full edition now.

Need Help?
Contact customer service
847-559-7581   More options
Not a subscriber? Start your magazine subscription.

To promote efficiency and effectiveness, organizations are encouraging collaboration among related functions within the enterprise. Two areas for which this makes sense is the research and development (R&D) or product engineering group and the procurement group. In product development, members of the procurement group can provide insight regarding the purchasing of product components. Some organizations are going a step further to involve select external partners as well. In fact, APQC’s Open Standards Benchmarking data in product development indicates that 66% of organizations involve their suppliers in new product or service development, including product improvements and extensions. In turn, members of the R&D function can be involved in the selection of suppliers to ensure the best supply of components and materials.

APQC’s research indicates that organizations encouraging collaboration between the R&D function and suppliers can take advantage of benefits such as a reduction in the total cost to manufacture a product or easier sourcing of components. Involvement of the R&D function in supplier selection and appraisal can lead to lower procurement costs. However, these benefits may come at the expense of some aspects of procurement efficiency.

Supplier involvement in product development
The amount that organizations involve their suppliers in the product development process varies, with only about 31% of organizations having extensive participation of suppliers in these efforts. Those that do have extensive participation can create opportunities that are mutually beneficial. APQC has found that one way organizations accomplish this is by involving suppliers in the management of cost targets for new products and their components. Organizations communicate cost targets for products or components to their suppliers at varying stages of the development process. As shown in Figure 1, a similar number of organizations communicate cost targets to suppliers during the design stage of product development as during the sourcing stage. Only about 19% of organizations communicate targets to suppliers during the earlier stages when product specifications and concept designs are developed, and about one-third of organizations do not communicate cost targets to their suppliers at all.

This complete article is available to subscribers only.
Click on Log In Now at the top of this article for full access.
Or, Start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.

SC
MR

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

From the May-June 2016 edition of Supply Chain Management Review.

May-June 2016

The procurement function is at an inflection point.” So begins “The reinvention of procurement," an article by Jonathan Hughes and Danny Ertel, partners at the Boston-based consulting firm Vantage Partners.…
Browse this issue archive.
Access your online digital edition.
Download a PDF file of the May-June 2016 issue.

Download Article PDF

To promote efficiency and effectiveness, organizations are encouraging collaboration among related functions within the enterprise. Two areas for which this makes sense is the research and development (R&D) or product engineering group and the procurement group. In product development, members of the procurement group can provide insight regarding the purchasing of product components. Some organizations are going a step further to involve select external partners as well. In fact, APQC's Open Standards Benchmarking data in product development indicates that 66% of organizations involve their suppliers in new product or service development, including product improvements and extensions. In turn, members of the R&D function can be involved in the selection of suppliers to ensure the best supply of components and materials.

APQC's research indicates that organizations encouraging collaboration between the R&D function and suppliers can take advantage of benefits such as a reduction in the total cost to manufacture a product or easier sourcing of components. Involvement of the R&D function in supplier selection and appraisal can lead to lower procurement costs. However, these benefits may come at the expense of some aspects of procurement efficiency.

Supplier involvement in product development
The amount that organizations involve their suppliers in the product development process varies, with only about 31% of organizations having extensive participation of suppliers in these efforts. Those that do have extensive participation can create opportunities that are mutually beneficial. APQC has found that one way organizations accomplish this is by involving suppliers in the management of cost targets for new products and their components. Organizations communicate cost targets for products or components to their suppliers at varying stages of the development process. As shown in Figure 1, a similar number of organizations communicate cost targets to suppliers during the design stage of product development as during the sourcing stage. Only about 19% of organizations communicate targets to suppliers during the earlier stages when product specifications and concept designs are developed, and about one-third of organizations do not communicate cost targets to their suppliers at all.

SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article.

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Talking Supply Chain: Doomsday never arrives for Baltimore bridge collapse impacts
The collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key bridge brought doomsday headlines for the supply chain. But the reality has been something less…
Listen in

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service