•   Exclusive

Close Relationships Lead to Superior Planning

Partner involvement in supply chain planning is beneficial, but now may be the time to take it to the next level.

Subscriber: Log Out

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

This is an excerpt of the original article. It was written for the May-June 2015 edition of Supply Chain Management Review. The full article is available to current subscribers.

May-June 2015

As supply chain managers we are challenged year in and year out to figure out new, innovative ways to improve our operations. We have to translate educated guesses about what’s next into new investments in our processes. Such may be the case with robotics, 3D printing and additive manufacturing, and investments in new mobile technologies. However, successful planning, including planning for risk, resiliency, and flexibility, can help prepare you for whatever is next.
Browse this issue archive.
Already a subscriber? Access full edition now.

Need Help?
Contact customer service
847-559-7581   More options
Not a subscriber? Start your magazine subscription.

Superior supply chain planning requires excellent insight into customer demand for products and the availability of materials from suppliers. Many organizations look to data collected internally to better understand these factors, but others collaborate with external supply chain partners as well. Collaboration with customers and suppliers can provide organizations with valuable perspectives on the supply chain that can result in benefits for all involved.

To determine the extent to which external collaboration can benefit supply chain planning efforts, APQC looked at data from its Open Standards Benchmarking in supply chain planning.* Participating organizations provided the extent to which their sales and operations planning processes involve external demand collaboration with customers, and the extent to which these processes involve external supply planning collaboration with suppliers. APQC grouped organizations based on the degree to which they engage in each type of external collaboration. The data indicates that organizations with more collaboration with either of these external groups have more accurate forecasts and more efficient planning operations.

Working with Customers Means Getting More
The data indicates that organizations collaborating more with their customers to determine demand more accurately predict the needs of their businesses with fewer staff and for a similar cost as organizations that conduct less collaboration with their customers. Those organizations collaborating more with their customers from some to a very great extent have a lower average monthly national forecast error than organizations that only collaborate with their customers to little or no extent. Those with more collaboration have a median error of 5.2 percent, whereas organizations with less collaboration have a median error of 13 percent. Organizations are clearly seeing benefits from greater collaboration with their customers to better determine demand for products. By getting the customer perspective on the market, organizations are able to more accurately determine how much product they should produce and keep on hand.

 

This complete article is available to subscribers only.
Click on Log In Now at the top of this article for full access.
Or, Start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.

SC
MR

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

From the May-June 2015 edition of Supply Chain Management Review.

May-June 2015

As supply chain managers we are challenged year in and year out to figure out new, innovative ways to improve our operations. We have to translate educated guesses about what’s next into new investments in our…
Browse this issue archive.
Access your online digital edition.
Download a PDF file of the May-June 2015 issue.

Download Article PDF

Superior supply chain planning requires excellent insight into customer demand for products and the availability of materials from suppliers. Many organizations look to data collected internally to better understand these factors, but others collaborate with external supply chain partners as well. Collaboration with customers and suppliers can provide organizations with valuable perspectives on the supply chain that can result in benefits for all involved.

To determine the extent to which external collaboration can benefit supply chain planning efforts, APQC looked at data from its Open Standards Benchmarking in supply chain planning.* Participating organizations provided the extent to which their sales and operations planning processes involve external demand collaboration with customers, and the extent to which these processes involve external supply planning collaboration with suppliers. APQC grouped organizations based on the degree to which they engage in each type of external collaboration. The data indicates that organizations with more collaboration with either of these external groups have more accurate forecasts and more efficient planning operations.

Working with Customers Means Getting More
The data indicates that organizations collaborating more with their customers to determine demand more accurately predict the needs of their businesses with fewer staff and for a similar cost as organizations that conduct less collaboration with their customers. Those organizations collaborating more with their customers from some to a very great extent have a lower average monthly national forecast error than organizations that only collaborate with their customers to little or no extent. Those with more collaboration have a median error of 5.2 percent, whereas organizations with less collaboration have a median error of 13 percent. Organizations are clearly seeing benefits from greater collaboration with their customers to better determine demand for products. By getting the customer perspective on the market, organizations are able to more accurately determine how much product they should produce and keep on hand.

SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article.

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Talking Supply Chain: Doomsday never arrives for Baltimore bridge collapse impacts
The collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key bridge brought doomsday headlines for the supply chain. But the reality has been something less…
Listen in

About the Author

Sarah Petrie, Executive Managing Editor, Peerless Media
Sarah Petrie's Bio Photo

I am the executive managing editor of two business-to-business magazines. I run the day-to-day activities of the magazines and their Websites. I am responsible for schedules, editing, and production of those books. I also assist in the editing and copy editing responsibilities of a third magazine and handle the editing and production of custom publishing projects. Additionally, I have past experience in university-level teaching and marketing writing.

View Sarah's author profile.

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service