•   Exclusive

Bringin’ it all back home

As conditions change in some emerging markets, companies that once outsourced some of their manufacturing and distribution processes are thinking about bringing them back in-house. We look at the five key considerations a company should explore before pulling the trigger on insourcing their outsourced processes.

Subscriber: Log Out

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

This is an excerpt of the original article. It was written for the July-August 2016 edition of Supply Chain Management Review. The full article is available to current subscribers.

July-August 2016

What’s the difference between us and our competitors? Our people!” I can’t think of an organization that doesn’t publicly state that its people are its most important asset. Yet, anyone who has been in the workforce for any length of time knows that when the rubber hits the road—or something else hits the fan—people are usually the first casualty of cost cutting. It’s far easier to free up your talent for “other opportunities” than it is to close a plant or sell a fleet of trucks.
Browse this issue archive.
Already a subscriber? Access full edition now.

Need Help?
Contact customer service
847-559-7581   More options
Not a subscriber? Start your magazine subscription.

Outsourcing and globalization: For the better part of this century, these strategic initiatives have gone hand-in-glove at many organizations. Whether in pursuit of lower costs, simplifying operations or just trying to keep pace with the global expansion of their customers, companies have sought to outsource nonessential operations with an emphasis on more global supply chains. Many of these supply chains were established at a feverish pace as the global outsourcing trend was met with the open arms of developing countries eager to participate. Today, however, some of these supply chains have been operational for years. The low-hanging fruit has been picked and the dust has long settled from the intrepid efforts of the global outsourcing “gold rush.” Additionally the pace of economic growth of emerging economies has slowed, which may present new risks and financial considerations.

All of that is leading some companies to reassess their operations and supply chains with more global experience and a greater sense of scrutiny. While many of the supply chains established during the globalization gold rush still provide a sustainable strategic advantage, several other outsourcing decisions may no longer represent the best value option. Accordingly, organizations need to constantly reassess their strategic options and ask where it makes sense to bring some activities back in-house. This does not necessarily mean re-shoring: While some activities may be brought back to a company’s home turf, insourcing may also involve using in-house personnel to execute tasks in an existing foreign market that are currently outsourced. In this regard, insourcing is the new challenge in today’s supply chains.

Insourcing efforts are often justified on several grounds; these include reducing costs, improving the value delivered to customers and building organizational capabilities. However, insourcing activities are not risk free. Quite to the contrary, they involve critical challenges in transitioning work and carry a considerable risk of failure.

This complete article is available to subscribers only.
Click on Log In Now at the top of this article for full access.
Or, Start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.

 

SC
MR

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

From the July-August 2016 edition of Supply Chain Management Review.

July-August 2016

What’s the difference between us and our competitors? Our people!” I can’t think of an organization that doesn’t publicly state that its people are its most important asset. Yet, anyone who has been in the…
Browse this issue archive.
Access your online digital edition.
Download a PDF file of the July-August 2016 issue.

Download Article PDF

Outsourcing and globalization: For the better part of this century, these strategic initiatives have gone hand-in-glove at many organizations. Whether in pursuit of lower costs, simplifying operations or just trying to keep pace with the global expansion of their customers, companies have sought to outsource nonessential operations with an emphasis on more global supply chains. Many of these supply chains were established at a feverish pace as the global outsourcing trend was met with the open arms of developing countries eager to participate. Today, however, some of these supply chains have been operational for years. The low-hanging fruit has been picked and the dust has long settled from the intrepid efforts of the global outsourcing “gold rush.” Additionally the pace of economic growth of emerging economies has slowed, which may present new risks and financial considerations.

All of that is leading some companies to reassess their operations and supply chains with more global experience and a greater sense of scrutiny. While many of the supply chains established during the globalization gold rush still provide a sustainable strategic advantage, several other outsourcing decisions may no longer represent the best value option. Accordingly, organizations need to constantly reassess their strategic options and ask where it makes sense to bring some activities back in-house. This does not necessarily mean re-shoring: While some activities may be brought back to a company's home turf, insourcing may also involve using in-house personnel to execute tasks in an existing foreign market that are currently outsourced. In this regard, insourcing is the new challenge in today's supply chains.

Insourcing efforts are often justified on several grounds; these include reducing costs, improving the value delivered to customers and building organizational capabilities. However, insourcing activities are not risk free. Quite to the contrary, they involve critical challenges in transitioning work and carry a considerable risk of failure.

SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article.

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Talking Supply Chain: Doomsday never arrives for Baltimore bridge collapse impacts
The collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key bridge brought doomsday headlines for the supply chain. But the reality has been something less…
Listen in

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service