Login



For PLUS+ subscription assistance, contact customer service.

Not a PLUS+ Subscriber?

Become a PLUS+ Subscriber today and you'll get access to all Supply Chain Management Review premium content including:

  • Full Web Access
  • 7 Magazine Issues per Year
  • Companion Digital Editions
  • Digital Edition Archives
  • Bonus Email Newsletters

Subscribe Today!

Premium access to exclusive online content, companion digital editions, magazine issues and email newsletters.

Subscribe Now.


Become a PLUS+ subscriber and you'll get access to all Supply Chain Management Review premium content including:

  • Full Web Access. All feature articles, bonus reports and industry research through scmr.com.

  • 7 Magazine Issues per year of Supply Chain Management Review magazine.

  • Companion Digital Editions. Searchable replicas of each magazine issue. Read them in any web browser. Delivered by email faster than printed issues.

  • Digital Editions Archives. Every article, every chart and every table as it appeared in the magazine for all archive issues back to 2009.

  • Bonus email newsletters. Add convenient weekly and monthly email newsletters to your subscription to keep your finger on the pulse of the industry.

PLUS+ subscriptions start as low as $109/year*. Begin yours now.
That's less than $0.36 per day for access to information that you can use year-round to better manage your entire global supply chain.

For assistance with your PLUS+ subscription, contact customer service.

* Prices higher for subscriptions outside the USA.

PLUS+ Customer Service Support


Customer service for all PLUS+ subscribers is available Mon-Fri, 9am-5pm Eastern time.

Email: scmrsubs@ehpub.com
Phone: 1-800-598-6067 (1-508-663-1500 x294 outside USA)
Mail: PO Box 1496, Framingham MA 01701-1496, USA



You have been logged out of PLUS+


For PLUS+ subscription assistance, contact customer service.

Need to access our premium PLUS+ Content?
Upgrade your subscription now.


Our records show that you are currently receiving a free subscription to Supply Chain Management Review magazine, or your subscription has expired. To access our premium content, you need to upgrade your subscription to our PLUS+ status.

To upgrade your subscription account, please contact customer service at:

Email: scmrsubs@ehpub.com Phone: 1-800-598-6067 (1-508-663-1500 x294 outside USA)

Become a PLUS+ subscriber and you'll get access to all Supply Chain Management Review premium content including:

  • Full Web Access. All feature articles, bonus reports and industry research through scmr.com.

  • 7 Magazine Issues per year of Supply Chain Management Review magazine.

  • Companion Digital Editions. Searchable replicas of each magazine issue. Read them in any web browser. Delivered by email faster than printed issues.

  • Digital Editions Archives. Every article, every chart and every table as it appeared in the magazine for all archive issues back to 2010.

  • Bonus email newsletters. Add convenient weekly and monthly email newsletters to your subscription to keep your finger on the pulse of the industry.

PLUS+ subscriptions start as low as $129/year*. Start yours now.
That's less than $0.36 per day for access to information that you can use year-round to better manage your entire global supply chain.

This content is available for PLUS+ subscribers.


Already a PLUS+ subscriber?


To begin or upgrade your subscription, Become a PLUS+ subscriber now.

For assistance with your PLUS+ subscription, contact customer service.

Sorry, but your login to PLUS+ has failed.


Please recheck your login information and resubmit below.



For PLUS+ subscription assistance, contact customer service.

3 Loads but only 2 Trucks: Which Load is Left Behind?

A common strategy to combat demand uncertainty is the use of safety stock, but this also increases the risk of excess stock, increased obsolescence, and higher carrying costs.

By ·
By ·

Editor’s Note: Every year, 40 or so students in the MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics’ (MIT CTL) Master of Supply Chain Management (SCM) program complete one-year thesis research projects.  The students are early-career business professionals from multiple countries with 2 to 10 years of experience in the industry.  The research projects are sponsored by and carried out in collaboration with multinational corporations.  Joint teams of company people, MIT SCM students, and MIT CTL faculty work on real-world problems chosen by sponsor companies.  In this series, we summarize a selection of the latest SCM research.  The researchers for the project described below, Richard Koury Rassey and Yong Zheng, defined a method for prioritizing inbound loads when carriers are capacitated for their MIT Supply Chain Management Program master’s thesis.  The sponsor was a major retailer, and the project was supervised by Dr. Chris Caplice, Executive Director, MIT CTL and Dr. Francisco Jauffred, Research Affiliate, MIT CTL.

Retailers often face demand uncertainty due to seasonality and variable consumer shopping behavior, so supply chain robustness is critical to ensure sufficient product availability. 

A common strategy to combat demand uncertainty is the use of safety stock, but this also increases the risk of excess stock, increased obsolescence, and higher carrying costs. 

The thesis research sponsor company, ShopCo (a pseudonym), is a major retailer that wanted to define prioritization logic for inbound loads to determine which loads received priority, and when inventory would exceed carrier capacity.  Each load can comprise one or more purchase orders (POs).

To address these issues, we developed a method based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to assign priority scores to each load.

Lack of Control Created Opportunity

ShopCo places weekly orders for various types of merchandise throughout the United States.  Historically, ShopCo relied on its suppliers and carriers to determine the order of loads that were picked up. Unfortunately, these trading partners used logic that may not meet ShopCo’s needs.

The retailer is striving to improve product availability at the store level, and wants to ensure its supply chain is prioritized around this goal.  Currently, it uses an internally developed load allocation tool to assign PO’s to loads. However, the tool’s objective function is based largely on reducing costs rather than improving product availability.

The lack of control over which loads were shipped created an opportunity to improve the inbound transportation process. We developed prioritization logic based on ShopCo’s objectives to determine the order that loads were picked up. 

The challenge was overcoming the difficulty in comparing loads with different characteristics and aligning stakeholders with conflicting perspectives on priority.  The AHP provided a framework to prioritize loads with multiple criteria. In addition, a consensus was reached among the stakeholders on which priority values should be assigned to specific characteristics of each load. 

Application and Next Steps

After applying the AHP priority values to a sample of ShopCo’s load dataset, we segmented the priority scores to define thresholds to facilitate decision-making.  For example, the priority scores in the top 20 percent defined the thresholds for the “critical” segment.  This segment is required to ship that day, so if there were a capacity constraint, more carrying capacity was needed.  This segmentation equips ShopCo with thresholds to more efficiently manage the loads and make quicker decisions.

Since ShopCo uses a load allocation tool to assign PO’s to loads, we hypothesized that it is possible to increase the total priority scores shipped by reshuffling the PO’s using a Knapsack optimization model.  We took a sample of the loads and found that we could improve the total load priority score shipped by up to 8.3 percent as compared to the performance of the allocation method.  Although the existing tool appears to adequately optimize loads, there is an opportunity for improvement.

We believe this research benefits not only ShopCo, but also other companies and industries that manage their inbound transportation with carrier capacity constraints.  Although the factors used may differ, this underlying framework would align load priorities with company objectives. 

For further information on the SCM thesis authored by Rassey and Zheng titled Prioritizing Inbound Transportation contact Dr. Bruce Arntzen, Executive Director, MIT Supply Chain Management Program at: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).  For more information on the SCM program visit http://scm.mit.edu/program.


About the Author

Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at pburnson@peerlessmedia.com.

Subscribe to Supply Chain Management Review Magazine!

Subscribe today. Don't Miss Out!
Get in-depth coverage from industry experts with proven techniques for cutting supply chain costs and case studies in supply chain best practices.
Start Your Subscription Today!

Latest Whitepaper
Plan. Manage. Recover. The power of risk management and resilience.
Savvy supply chain managers are putting risk management at the top of their to-do lists, planning for the recovery following inevitable disruptions.
Download Today!
From the September-October 2017
Additive manufacturing and 3D printing promise to simplify manufacturing, reduce inventories, and streamline operations. But, to determine when and how to apply additive manufacturing, organizations need a decision model that assesses it’s market strategy, supply chain performance, and complexity.
View More From this Issue
Subscribe to Our Email Newsletter
Sign up today to receive our FREE, weekly email newsletter!


Latest Webcast
Risk and Resiliency 2.0:  Three New Keys to Managing Supply Chain Risk
It’s no longer enough to simply identify risk. In Risk Management 2.0, resiliency is the name of the game. This webinar explains how leading firms are broadening their view of risk; expanding it to include the impact on reputation and social responsibility; and elevating the corporate and strategic importance of risk management.
Register Today!
EDITORS' PICKS
Leveraging SCM Digitization to Attack New Markets
Finding the proper mix of services while mitigating risk has never been more complicated for freight...
Clean Cargo Working Group Launches Annual Emissions Factors
The Clean Cargo Working Group reached a major milestone of 50 corporate members

Data Management “Hype Cycle” Revealed in Gartner 2017 Report
The “Hype Cycle for Data Management,” developed by Gartner, Inc. is designed to assist CIOs,...
Tech Innovation Creates Some Jobs But Puts Others at Risk
The dramatic opening of the global economy, combined with the rapid pace of technological change,...